Literature DB >> 23860135

Early versus delayed operative intervention in displaced clavicle fractures.

Avishek Das1, Katie E Rollins, Kathleen Elliott, Philip Johnston, Lee van-Rensburg, Graham M Tytherleigh-Strong, Benjamin J Ollivere.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recent evidence to suggest that fixation of clavicle fractures yields better outcomes than conservative treatments has led to an increasing trend toward operative management. There is no evidence, however, to compare early fixation with delayed fixation for symptomatic patients before union.
DESIGN: Prospective comparative case series.
SETTING: Level 1 regional trauma center. PATIENTS: Displaced clavicle fractures treated operatively in our institution during a 4-year period. Ninety-seven patients were included: 68 with early fixation and 29 delayed. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were available for all patients and scores were available for 62. INTERVENTION: Early plate fixation (within 3 weeks) of displaced clavicle fractures compared with delayed (3-12 weeks) fixation of displaced clavicle fractures. OUTCOMES: Radiographic union, Oxford Shoulder Score, QuickDASH, EQ5D, and a patient interview. Mean follow-up was to 30 months.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age (P > 0.05), sex (P > 0.05), and energy of injury (P > 0.05) between the 2 groups. The mean QuickDASH was 8.9 early and 9.1 delayed (P < 0.05) and the Oxford Shoulder Score was 44.2 early and 43.9 delayed (P < 0.05). In the early fixation group, there were 5 wound healing complications, and 8 went on subsequently to have removal of prominent metalwork. In the delayed fixation group, 2 had wound healing complications and 4 required removal of prominent metalwork. There were no statistically significant differences in the EQ5D scores.
CONCLUSION: Our series supports delayed fixation of symptomatic clavicle fractures as results do not differ from early fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23860135     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182a2968e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts in the management of clavicle fractures.

Authors:  Robert Moverley; Nick Little; Abhinav Gulihar; Bijayendra Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-07-24

2.  Plate fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures for delayed union and non-union is a cost-effective intervention but functional deficits persist at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Ben Fox; Nicholas David Clement; Deborah J MacDonald; Michael Robinson; Jamie A Nicholson
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2021-02-17

3.  Morphological characteristics and management of greater tuberosity fractures associated with anterior glenohumeral joint dislocation: A single centre 10-year retrospective review.

Authors:  Khalis Boksh; Ananth Srinivasan; Ganapathy Perianayagam; Harvinder Singh; Amit Modi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-06

4.  Minimal Pain Decrease Between 2 and 4 Weeks After Nonoperative Management of a Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Is Associated with a High Risk of Symptomatic Nonunion.

Authors:  Andreas H Qvist; Michael T Væsel; Carsten M Jensen; Thomas Jakobsen; Steen L Jensen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Open reduction and internal fixation with plating is beneficial in the early recovery stage for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in patients aged 30-65 years old.

Authors:  Jian-Yuan Chu; Kuang-Ting Yeh; Ru-Ping Lee; Tzai-Chiu Yu; Ing-Ho Chen; Cheng-Huan Peng; Kuan-Lin Liu; Jen-Hung Wang; Wen-Tien Wu
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.