Literature DB >> 32675585

Minimal Pain Decrease Between 2 and 4 Weeks After Nonoperative Management of a Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Is Associated with a High Risk of Symptomatic Nonunion.

Andreas H Qvist1,2,3, Michael T Væsel4, Carsten M Jensen5, Thomas Jakobsen2,6, Steen L Jensen2,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The main long-term benefit of operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures is the reduction in nonunion risk, and as this risk is generally low, the ideal approach would be to operate only patients at high risk of nonunion. However, most current surgical decision models use baseline variables to estimate the nonunion risk, and the value of these models remains unclear. Pain in the early weeks after fracture could be potentially be an indirect measurement of fracture healing, and so it is a potential proxy variable that could lead to simpler prediction models. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is pain a possible proxy variable for the development of symptomatic nonunion after nonoperative treatment of midshaft clavicular fractures? (2) How reliable is the model we created that uses pain as a proxy variable for symptomatic nonunion of nonoperatively treated clavicle fractures?
METHODS: In this secondary retrospective analysis of an earlier randomized trial, we studied prospectively collected data from 64 nonoperatively treated patients aged 18 years to 60 years. In the original randomized trial, we compared operative and nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. In all, 150 patients were included in the study, of whom 71 received nonoperative treatment. Patients were predominantly males (75%, 48 of 64) with a mean age of 38 ± SD 12 years; most fractures were comminuted and shortened more than 1 cm. All 71 patients who were nonoperatively treated were potentially eligible for this secondary analysis; of those, 11% (8 of 71) were lost to follow-up, leaving 63 patients from the nonoperative treatment arm and one patient from the operative treatment arm (who declined surgical treatment after randomization but was followed in this group according to the intention-to-treat principle) for analysis here. Nonunion was defined as lack of callus formation, persistent fracture lines and/or sclerotic edges of the bones at the fracture site on plain radiographs at 6 months follow-up. Nonunions were regarded as symptomatic if pain, tenderness, and local crepitation were present at the fracture site. Seventeen percent (11 of 64) of patients had symptomatic nonunions. After investigating differences in early pain scores between the union and nonunion groups, we defined the VASratio as the VAS pain score at 4 weeks divided by the VAS pain score at 2 weeks. Week 2 VAS pain score was chosen as baseline after visual inspection of a linear mixed model that showed increased divergence in pain scores between union and nonunion group at 2 weeks after fracture. Week 4 was chosen as the cutoff because we wanted a reasonable time frame for the detection of pain reduction and did not want to delay surgical treatment more than necessary. Odds ratios for various risk factors were calculated using logistic regression analyses. We used a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to identify cutoff values for the VASratio.
RESULTS: An increase in absolute pain score at 4 weeks after fracture (odds ratio 1.8 per 1 point increase [95% confidence interval 1.1 to 3.4]) was associated with an increased risk of nonunion 6 months after fracture. Likewise, we found that an increasing VASratio (OR 1.02 per 0.01 point increase [95% CI 1.002 to 1.06]) was also associated with nonunion. Receiver operating curve analysis found that the best cutoff value of VASratio was about 0.6. Patients with a VASratio above 0.6 had a relative risk of developing nonunion of 18 (95% CI 2 to 130) compared with patients with a VASratio below 0.6. Sparse-data bias could be present, as is evident from this wide confidence interval, though even at the low end of the confidence interval, the relative risk was 2, which may still improve surgical decision-making.
CONCLUSION: A pain score that exhibits no or minimal change from 2 to 4 weeks after nonoperative treatment of a displaced midshaft fracture of the clavicle is associated with a high risk that symptomatic nonunion will develop. Patients with no or minimal change in pain in the early weeks may be candidates for surgery to reduce the risk of symptomatic nonunion. As this was a retrospective study, with a risk of sparse-data bias, the predictive value of the VASratio needs to be further investigated in large prospective studies before clinical use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.
Copyright © 2020 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32675585      PMCID: PMC7899429          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.755


  39 in total

1.  Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG)

Authors:  P L Hudak; P C Amadio; C Bombardier
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 2.  Predictors associated with nonunion and symptomatic malunion following non-operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures--a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Ann Jørgensen; Anders Troelsen; Ilija Ban
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales.

Authors:  D D Price; F M Bush; S Long; S W Harkins
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Sequelae from clavicular fractures are common: a prospective study of 222 patients.

Authors:  Jan Nowak; Margareta Holgersson; Sune Larsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Surgical treatment of displaced middle-third clavicular fractures: a prospective, randomized trial in a working compensation population.

Authors:  Patricio A Melean; Adrian Zuniga; Michael Marsalli; Nelson A Fritis; Erik R Cook; Matías Zilleruelo; Cristian Alvarez
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture.

Authors:  C Michael Robinson; Charles M Court-Brown; Margaret M McQueen; Alison E Wakefield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Does delay matter? The restoration of objectively measured shoulder strength and patient-oriented outcome after immediate fixation versus delayed reconstruction of displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Potter; Caroline Jones; Lisa M Wild; Emil H Schemitsch; Michael D McKee
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 8.  Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings.

Authors:  Roger B Fillingim; Christopher D King; Margarete C Ribeiro-Dasilva; Bridgett Rahim-Williams; Joseph L Riley
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  What Is the Best Evidence for Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of 22 Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Daniel E Axelrod; Seper Ekhtiari; Anthony Bozzo; Mohit Bhandari; Herman Johal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II - binary and time-to-event outcomes.

Authors:  Richard D Riley; Kym Ie Snell; Joie Ensor; Danielle L Burke; Frank E Harrell; Karel Gm Moons; Gary S Collins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  2 in total

1.  Not the Last Word: Masks and the Veil of Ignorance.

Authors:  Joseph Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  CORR Insights®: Minimal Pain Decrease Between 2 and 4 Weeks after Nonoperative Management of a Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Is Associated with a High Risk of Symptomatic Nonunion.

Authors:  Mitchell S Fourman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.