| Literature DB >> 31992912 |
Robert Moverley1, Nick Little2, Abhinav Gulihar3, Bijayendra Singh4.
Abstract
Clavicle fractures comprise approximately 3% of all adult fractures and there is evidence that the incidence is increasing. Fractures of the lateral and middle third of the clavicle present distinct challenges in both surgical fixation techniques and clinical outcome, as such they should be recognised as separate clinical entities. Despite conflicting evidence, most studies indicate that superior clinical results are found in patients with united clavicle fractures rather than those that go onto non-union. Furthermore there is level-1 evidence that operative treatment of clavicle fractures leads to significantly increased rates of union. Despite these findings, significant controversy still exists on which patients would benefit from primary fixation and those who could successfully be managed non-operatively. We present an evidence-based review of clavicle fracture management including surgical indications, techniques, and results.Entities:
Keywords: Clavicle fracture; Clavicle non-union; Lateral clavicle
Year: 2019 PMID: 31992912 PMCID: PMC6978197 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.07.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Orthop Trauma ISSN: 0976-5662