Literature DB >> 28281112

Performance of Kymerax© precision-drive articulating surgical system compared to conventional laparoscopic instruments in a pelvitrainer model.

Marco Alain Sieber1,2, Bernhard Fellmann-Fischer3, Michael Mueller3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Kymerax© Precision-Drive Articulating Surgical System by Terumo© is a handheld laparoscopic robot which permits motion in two additional degrees of freedom (deflection and rotation in the instrument tip). In a pelvitrainer model, we compared the performance of participants with different laparoscopic experiences and compared Kymerax© to conventional laparoscopic instruments.
METHODS: 20 expert surgeons, performing more than 50 laparoscopic procedures per year, and 25 medical students without any experience in surgery at all were selected. Each participant was randomized into two groups: Group TK performed the tasks using the traditional laparoscopic Instruments (TLI) first and Kymerax© thereafter, group KT vice versa. Six standardized tasks were used: Two instructional exercises and four tasks where time, number of mistakes, and overall precision were measured. Finally, a questionnaire had to be answered.
RESULTS: All four tasks were performed significantly more slowly with the Kymerax© device. Improved needle control in stitches towards the surgeon, significantly less deviation while cutting along different lines as well as a significantly reduced fraying of the cutting edge were found when participants were using Kymerax©. By questionnaire more than 90% of the participants indicated clear advantages using Kymerax©. However, participants needed more training time and had an earlier loss of concentration with Kymerax©. Further complaints about Kymerax© were its limitations in rotation and deflection, the impaired view as well as the non-ergonomic instrument handle. Rotation force, instrument weight, digital instrument-tip control, and needle fixation were rated as accurate.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that more time is needed to solve tasks with Kymerax© compared to conventional laparoscopic instruments. Kymerax© is superior to conventional laparoscopy for suturing at difficult angles and cutting along complex structures. Kymerax© can potentially bring benefits for certain laparoscopic tasks, but as seen in this study, further developments are necessary. Terumo© meanwhile closed down its Kymerax © business.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Degrees of freedom; Gynecology; Handheld robot; Kymerax; Laparoscopy; Pelvitrainer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28281112     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5438-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Experimental results of mesh fixation by a manual manipulator in a laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair model.

Authors:  N Inaki; M Waseda; M O Schurr; M Braun; G F Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The radius surgical system - a new device for complex minimally invasive procedures in urology?

Authors:  Thomas Frede; Ahmed Hammady; Jan Klein; Dogu Teber; Noriyuki Inaki; Masahiro Waseda; Gerhard Buess; Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Precision in stitches: Radius Surgical System.

Authors:  M Waseda; N Inaki; J R Torres Bermudez; G Manukyan; I A Gacek; M O Schurr; M Braun; G F Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Direct manipulation of tool-like masters for controlling a master-slave surgical robotic system.

Authors:  Linan Zhang; Ningxin Zhou; Shuxin Wang
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.547

5.  Laparoscopic intracorporal colorectal sutured anastomosis using the Radius Surgical System in a phantom model.

Authors:  J R Torres Bermudez; G Buess; M Waseda; I Gacek; F Becerra Garcia; G A Manukyan; N Inaki; N Inaky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  [Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery and its importance in surgical training].

Authors:  Francisco Julián Pérez-Duarte; Francisco Miguel Sánchez-Margallo; Idoia Díaz-Güemes Martín-Portugués; Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Hurtado; Marcos Lucas-Hernández; Jesús Usón Gargallo
Journal:  Cir Esp       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.653

7.  [Current status and future perspectives of robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer].

Authors:  Zhi-wei Jiang; Jie-shou Li
Journal:  Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2012-08

8.  Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Patrick P Yeung; Carlos R Bolden; Daniel Westreich; Craig Sobolewski
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.137

9.  Should surgical novices trade their retractors for joysticks? Videogame experience decreases the time needed to acquire surgical skills.

Authors:  Matthew D Shane; Barbara J Pettitt; Craig B Morgenthal; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  The role of the robotic technique in minimally invasive surgery in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Fabrizio Luca; Wanda Petz; Manuela Valvo; Sabine Cenciarelli; Massimiliano Zuccaro; Roberto Biffi
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2013-09-26
View more
  9 in total

1.  Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.

Authors:  Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Design, Analysis and Experimental Validation of a Novel 7-Degrees of Freedom Instrument for Laparoscopic Surgeries.

Authors:  Prabhat Kumar; Sagar Talele; Suresh Deshpande; Rupesh Ghyar; Sritam Rout; Bhallamudi Ravi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 3.  Review of the Standard and Advanced Screening, Staging Systems and Treatment Modalities for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Siaw Shi Boon; Ho Yin Luk; Chuanyun Xiao; Zigui Chen; Paul Kay Sheung Chan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Tibor A Zwimpfer; Claudine Wismer; Bernhard Fellmann-Fischer; James Geiger; Andreas Schötzau; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-26

5.  Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum.

Authors:  Daniel Uysal; Claudia Gasch; Rouven Behnisch; Felix Nickel; Beat Peter Müller-Stich; Markus Hohenfellner; Dogu Teber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Advances and Trends in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Andreas Meinzer; Ibrahim Alkatout; Thomas Franz Krebs; Jonas Baastrup; Katja Reischig; Roberts Meiksans; Robert Bergholz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Assessment of an Articulating Laparoscopic Needle Holder (FlexDex™) Compared to a Conventional Rigid Needle Holder in 2-Dimension Vision Amongst Novices: A Randomised Controlled Study.

Authors:  Nima Motahariasl; Sayed Borna Farzaneh; Sina Motahariasl; Ilya Kokotkin; Sara Sousi; Alexander Zargaran; David Zargaran; Bijendra Patel
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-02-04

8.  Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning.

Authors:  F J Voskens; E M van der Schans; J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Pneumatically driven surgical forceps displaying a magnified grasping torque.

Authors:  Takuya Iwai; Takahiro Kanno; Tetsuro Miyazaki; Daisuke Haraguchi; Kenji Kawashima
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2020-01-05       Impact factor: 2.547

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.