Literature DB >> 22925233

Impact of body mass index on perioperative morbidity, oncological, and functional outcomes after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Alexandre Campeggi1, Evanguelos Xylinas, Guillaume Ploussard, Idir Ouzaid, Alban Fabre, Yves Allory, Dimitri Vordos, Claude C Abbou, Laurent Salomon, Alexandre de la Taille.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of obesity on the outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a prospective urologic cancer database, 765 patients underwent extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. The patients were categorized into 3 groups of body mass index (kg/m(2)): <25.0 (n = 276, 30%, "normal weight"), 25.0 to 30.0 (n = 365, 48%, "overweight") and >30.0 (n = 124, 16%, "obese"). We assessed the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes in this cohort of patients. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation of continence and erectile function were performed using validated questionnaires.
RESULTS: Mean operative time was significantly longer in obese patients (P < .001) and blood loss was also more important (P < .01). The obese patients had the highest likelihood of having aggressive tumors: nonorgan confined prostate cancer (49%, P = .002) and Gleason score ≥ 7 (80%, P = .005). The obese group had the higher positive surgical margins rate (overall: 27%, P = .012; pT2: 20%, P = .02). With a mean follow-up of 38 months, obesity was not an independent predictive factor of biochemical recurrence. At the 12-month follow-up, 85%, 74%, and 72% of normal, overweight, and obese men, respectively, were continent (no pad) (P = .04). At the 12-month follow-up, 57%, 58%, and 40% of normal, overweight, and obese men, respectively, reported an erection sufficient for intercourse (P = .01).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a safe and effective procedure in obese men with midterm cancer control. However, obese patients are at higher risk of aggressive disease. Recovery of continence and potency in these patients are significantly lower compared to nonobese men.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22925233     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of Central Obesity on Storage Luts and Urinary Incontinence After Prostatic Surgery.

Authors:  Mauro Gacci; Arcangelo Sebastianelli; Matteo Salvi; Cosimo De Nunzio; Andrea Tubaro; Stavros Gravas; Ignacio Moncada; Sergio Serni; Mario Maggi; Linda Vignozzi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Obesity has multifaceted impact on biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of 36,927 patients.

Authors:  Meng-Bo Hu; Hua Xu; Pei-De Bai; Hao-Wen Jiang; Qiang Ding
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Matched comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy regarding pathologic and oncologic outcomes in obese patients.

Authors:  Jonas Busch; Mark L Gonzalgo; Natalia Leva; Michelle Ferrari; Hannes Cash; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Stefan Hinz; Kurt Miller; Ahmed Magheli
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy outcomes in obese and extremely obese men.

Authors:  Debasish Sundi; Adam C Reese; Lynda Z Mettee; Bruce J Trock; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  White adipose tissue-derived factors and prostate cancer progression: mechanisms and targets for interventions.

Authors:  Achinto Saha; Jill Hamilton-Reeves; John DiGiovanni
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 9.237

Review 6.  Obesity and biochemical recurrence in clinically localised prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 86,490 patients.

Authors:  Mario Rivera-Izquierdo; Javier Pérez de Rojas; Virginia Martínez-Ruiz; Miguel Ángel Arrabal-Polo; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; José Juan Jiménez-Moleón
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.455

7.  Impact of obesity on functional and oncological outcomes in radical perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  Bulent Altay; Bulent Erkurt; Vahit Guzelburc; Murat Can Kiremit; Mustafa Yucel Boz; Selami Albayrak
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Influence of obesity on localized prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Qu; Bo Dai; Yun-Yi Kong; Kun Chang; Ding-Wei Ye; Xu-Dong Yao; Shi-Lin Zhang; Hai-Liang Zhang; Wei-Yi Yang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and frozen-section analysis efficiently predict upgrading, upstaging, and extraprostatic extension in patients undergoing nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Roberto Bianchi; Gabriele Cozzi; Giuseppe Petralia; Sarah Alessi; Giuseppe Renne; Danilo Bottero; Antonio Brescia; Antonio Cioffi; Giovanni Cordima; Matteo Ferro; Deliu Victor Matei; Federica Mazzoleni; Gennaro Musi; Francesco Alessandro Mistretta; Alessandro Serino; Valeria Maria Lucia Tringali; Ioan Coman; Ottavio De Cobelli
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Obesity leads to a higher rate of positive surgical margins in the context of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Results of a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Christopher Goßler; Matthias May; Bernd Rosenhammer; Johannes Breyer; Gjoko Stojanoski; Steffen Weikert; Sebastian Lenart; Anton Ponholzer; Christina Dreissig; Maximilian Burger; Christian Gilfrich; Johannes Bründl
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.