OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of obesity on the outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a prospective urologic cancer database, 765 patients underwent extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. The patients were categorized into 3 groups of body mass index (kg/m(2)): <25.0 (n = 276, 30%, "normal weight"), 25.0 to 30.0 (n = 365, 48%, "overweight") and >30.0 (n = 124, 16%, "obese"). We assessed the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes in this cohort of patients. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation of continence and erectile function were performed using validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Mean operative time was significantly longer in obese patients (P < .001) and blood loss was also more important (P < .01). The obese patients had the highest likelihood of having aggressive tumors: nonorgan confined prostate cancer (49%, P = .002) and Gleason score ≥ 7 (80%, P = .005). The obese group had the higher positive surgical margins rate (overall: 27%, P = .012; pT2: 20%, P = .02). With a mean follow-up of 38 months, obesity was not an independent predictive factor of biochemical recurrence. At the 12-month follow-up, 85%, 74%, and 72% of normal, overweight, and obese men, respectively, were continent (no pad) (P = .04). At the 12-month follow-up, 57%, 58%, and 40% of normal, overweight, and obese men, respectively, reported an erection sufficient for intercourse (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a safe and effective procedure in obese men with midterm cancer control. However, obese patients are at higher risk of aggressive disease. Recovery of continence and potency in these patients are significantly lower compared to nonobese men.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of obesity on the outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a prospective urologic cancer database, 765 patients underwent extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. The patients were categorized into 3 groups of body mass index (kg/m(2)): <25.0 (n = 276, 30%, "normal weight"), 25.0 to 30.0 (n = 365, 48%, "overweight") and >30.0 (n = 124, 16%, "obese"). We assessed the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes in this cohort of patients. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation of continence and erectile function were performed using validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Mean operative time was significantly longer in obesepatients (P < .001) and blood loss was also more important (P < .01). The obesepatients had the highest likelihood of having aggressive tumors: nonorgan confined prostate cancer (49%, P = .002) and Gleason score ≥ 7 (80%, P = .005). The obese group had the higher positive surgical margins rate (overall: 27%, P = .012; pT2: 20%, P = .02). With a mean follow-up of 38 months, obesity was not an independent predictive factor of biochemical recurrence. At the 12-month follow-up, 85%, 74%, and 72% of normal, overweight, and obesemen, respectively, were continent (no pad) (P = .04). At the 12-month follow-up, 57%, 58%, and 40% of normal, overweight, and obesemen, respectively, reported an erection sufficient for intercourse (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a safe and effective procedure in obesemen with midterm cancer control. However, obesepatients are at higher risk of aggressive disease. Recovery of continence and potency in these patients are significantly lower compared to nonobese men.
Authors: Jonas Busch; Mark L Gonzalgo; Natalia Leva; Michelle Ferrari; Hannes Cash; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Stefan Hinz; Kurt Miller; Ahmed Magheli Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Mario Rivera-Izquierdo; Javier Pérez de Rojas; Virginia Martínez-Ruiz; Miguel Ángel Arrabal-Polo; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; José Juan Jiménez-Moleón Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 5.455
Authors: Roberto Bianchi; Gabriele Cozzi; Giuseppe Petralia; Sarah Alessi; Giuseppe Renne; Danilo Bottero; Antonio Brescia; Antonio Cioffi; Giovanni Cordima; Matteo Ferro; Deliu Victor Matei; Federica Mazzoleni; Gennaro Musi; Francesco Alessandro Mistretta; Alessandro Serino; Valeria Maria Lucia Tringali; Ioan Coman; Ottavio De Cobelli Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Christopher Goßler; Matthias May; Bernd Rosenhammer; Johannes Breyer; Gjoko Stojanoski; Steffen Weikert; Sebastian Lenart; Anton Ponholzer; Christina Dreissig; Maximilian Burger; Christian Gilfrich; Johannes Bründl Journal: Cent European J Urol Date: 2020-12-03