Literature DB >> 23857630

Methane emissions from river buffaloes fed on green fodders in relation to the nutrient [corrected] intake and digestibility.

Sonali Prusty1, Madhu Mohini, Shivlal Singh Kundu, Ajay Kumar, Chander Datt.   

Abstract

Fifteen male Murrah buffalo calves (15-18 months, 227.98 ± 4.44 kg body weight) were distributed randomly in to three equal groups and fed solely on either berseem (G1), oats (G2), or chicory fodder (G3). A digestibility trial followed by methane measurement using SF6 tracer technique was conducted. No significant difference was observed in nutrient intake; however, crude protein (CP) intake was lower in G2 (0.35 kg) than G1 (0.7) and in G3 (0.71) and non-fibrous carbohydrates (NFC), and neutral detergent insoluble CP (NDICP) intake was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in G3 (1.54 and 0.31 kg) followed by G2 (1.27 and 0.2 kg) and G1 (1.06 and 0.18 kg). The digestible dry matter, organic matter, neutral detergent fiber, and ether extract intake was similar in all the groups, whereas the digestible CP and NFC intake was lower in G2 compared to G1 and G3. Chicory- and berseem-fed groups emitted 12.2 and 5.2 % less methane than oats-fed group. However, no significant difference was observed in the absolute methane loss and methane loss as percentage of energy intake (p > 0.05) among the groups. There was positive correlation between nutrient intake and total methane production. However, an inverse relationship was observed between total digestible carbohydrate intake and methane production (g/kg dry matter intake). The following regression equations were developed to estimate methane production: methane (g/kg BW) = 128.8553 + (167.7456 × dNDFI) + (216.32 × dCPI) - (40.3313 × dNFCI) and methane (g/d) = -1.7494 + (41.42 × NDFI) + (39.8686 × CPI) + (0.5197 × NFCI).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23857630     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-013-0447-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  8 in total

1.  Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique.

Authors:  K Johnson; M Huyler; H Westberg; B Lamb; P Zimmerman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: a synthesis of current research and future directions.

Authors:  Amlan Kumar Patra
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Prediction of methane emission from beef cattle using data measured in indirect open-circuit respiration calorimeters.

Authors:  T Yan; M G Porter; C S Mayne
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.

Authors:  P J Van Soest; J B Robertson; B A Lewis
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Methane emissions from beef cattle: effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil.

Authors:  K A Beauchemin; S M McGinn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Methane production in cattle calculated by the nutrient composition of the diet.

Authors:  Werner Jentsch; Monika Schweigel; Friedrich Weissbach; Helmut Scholze; Wolfgang Pitroff; Michael Derno
Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Methane emissions from cattle.

Authors:  K A Johnson; D E Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Prediction of methane production from dairy and beef cattle.

Authors:  J L Ellis; E Kebreab; N E Odongo; B W McBride; E K Okine; J France
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.034

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.