Literature DB >> 22444941

Prediction of methane emission from beef cattle using data measured in indirect open-circuit respiration calorimeters.

T Yan1, M G Porter, C S Mayne.   

Abstract

The objectives of the present study were to examine relationships between methane (CH4) output and animal and dietary factors, and to use these relationships to develop prediction equations for CH4 emission from beef cattle. The dataset was obtained from 108 growing-to-finishing beef steers in five studies and CH4 production and energy metabolism data were measured in indirect respiration calorimeter chambers. Dietary forage proportion ranged from 29.5% to 100% (dry matter (DM) basis) and forages included grass silage, fresh grass, dried grass and fodder beet. Linear and multiple regression techniques were used to examine relationships between CH4 emission and animal and dietary variables, with the effects of experiment or forage type removed. Total CH4 emission was positively related to live weight (LW), feeding level and intake of feed (DM and organic matter) and energy (gross energy (GE), digestible energy (DE) and metabolisable energy (ME)) (P < 0.001), while CH4/DM intake (DMI) was negatively related to energy digestibility and ME/GE (P < 0.05 or less). Using LW alone to predict CH4 emission produced a poor relationship when compared to DMI and GE intake (GEI) (R2 = 0.26 v. 0.68 and 0.70 respectively). Adding feeding level, dietary NDF concentration and CP/ME or feeding level, energy digestibility and ME/GE to support LW resulted in a R2 of 0.66 or 0.84. The high R2 (0.84) was similar to that obtained using DMI or GEI together with energy digestibility and ME/GE as predictors. Further inclusion of dietary forage proportion and ADF and NDF concentration to the multiple relationships using GEI as the primary predictor resulted in a R2 of 0.87. These equations were evaluated through internal validation, by developing a range of similar new equations from two-thirds of the present data and then validating these new equations with the remaining one-third of data. The validation indicated that addition of energy digestibility and ME/GE to support LW with feeding level, DMI and GEI considerably increased the prediction accuracy. It is concluded that CH4 emission of beef steers can be accurately predicted from LW plus feeding level, DMI or GEI together with energy digestibility and ME/GE. The dataset was also used to validate a range of prediction equations for CH4 production of cattle published elsewhere.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 22444941     DOI: 10.1017/S175173110900473X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  9 in total

1.  Methane emissions from river buffaloes fed on green fodders in relation to the nutrient [corrected] intake and digestibility.

Authors:  Sonali Prusty; Madhu Mohini; Shivlal Singh Kundu; Ajay Kumar; Chander Datt
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Prediction of enteric methane emissions from lactating cows using methane to carbon dioxide ratio in the breath.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Suzuki; Yuko Kamiya; Kohei Oikawa; Itoko Nonaka; Takumi Shinkai; Fuminori Terada; Taketo Obitsu
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.974

3.  Genome-wide association identifies methane production level relation to genetic control of digestive tract development in dairy cows.

Authors:  M Pszczola; T Strabel; S Mucha; E Sell-Kubiak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Prediction of methane emission from sheep based on data measured in vivo from open-circuit respiratory studies

Authors:  Tao Ma; Kaidong Deng; Qiyu Diao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Effects of Dietary Forage Proportion on Feed Intake, Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Enteric Methane Emissions of Holstein Heifers at Various Growth Stages.

Authors:  Lifeng Dong; Binchang Li; Qiyu Diao
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Simulating grazing beef and sheep systems.

Authors:  L Wu; P Harris; T H Misselbrook; M R F Lee
Journal:  Agric Syst       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.370

7.  Predicting metabolizable energy from digestible energy for growing and finishing beef cattle and relationships to the prediction of methane.

Authors:  Kristin E Hales; Carley A Coppin; Zachary K Smith; Zach S McDaniel; Luis O Tedeschi; N Andy Cole; Michael L Galyean
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Effect of breed and pasture type on methane emissions from weaned lambs offered fresh forage.

Authors:  M D Fraser; H R Fleming; V J Theobald; J M Moorby
Journal:  J Agric Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.476

9.  Modelling the Effect of Diet Composition on Enteric Methane Emissions across Sheep, Beef Cattle and Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Matt Bell; Richard Eckard; Peter J Moate; Tianhai Yan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.