Literature DB >> 16699105

Methane emissions from beef cattle: effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil.

K A Beauchemin1, S M McGinn.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify feed additives that reduce enteric methane emissions from cattle. We measured methane emissions, total tract digestibility (using chromic oxide), and ruminal fermentation (4 h after feeding) in growing beef cattle fed a diet supplemented with various additives. The experiment was designed as a replicated 4 x 4 Latin square with 21-d periods and was conducted using 16 Angus heifers (initial BW of 260 +/- 32 kg). Treatments were: control (no additive), fumaric acid (175 g/d) with sodium bicarbonate (75 g/d), essential oil and spice extract (1 g/d), or canola oil (4.6% of DMI). The basal diet consisted of 75% whole-crop barley silage, 19% steam-rolled barley, and 6% supplement (DM basis). Four large chambers (2 animals fed the same diet per chamber) were equipped to measure methane emissions for 3 d each period. Adding canola oil to the diet decreased (P = 0.009) total daily methane emissions by 32% and tended (P = 0.09) to decrease methane emissions as a percentage of gross energy intake by 21%. However, much of the reduction in methane emissions was due to decreased (P < 0.05) feed intake and lower (P < 0.05) total tract digestibility of DM and fiber. Digestibility of all nutrients was also lowered (P < 0.05) by feeding essential oil, but there were no effects on ruminal fermentation or methane emissions. In contrast, adding fumaric acid to the diet increased total VFA concentration (P = 0.03), increased propionate proportions (P = 0.01), and decreased the acetate:propionate ratio (P = 0.002), but there was no measurable effect on methane emissions. The study demonstrates that canola oil can be used to reduce methane losses from cattle, but animal performance may be compromised due to lower feed intake and decreased fiber digestibility. Essential oils had no effect on methane emissions, whereas fumaric acid caused potentially beneficial changes in ruminal fermentation but no measurable reductions in methane emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16699105     DOI: 10.2527/2006.8461489x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  33 in total

1.  Effects of urea treatment of straw and dietary level of vegetable oil on lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  Chaowarit Mapato; Metha Wanapat; Anusorn Cherdthong
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: a synthesis of current research and future directions.

Authors:  Amlan Kumar Patra
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Effects of plants containing secondary compounds and plant oils on rumen fermentation and ecology.

Authors:  Metha Wanapat; Pongthon Kongmun; Onanong Poungchompu; Anusorn Cherdthong; Pichad Khejornsart; Ruangyote Pilajun; Sujittra Kaenpakdee
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 4.  Microbial fuel cells and microbial ecology: applications in ruminant health and production research.

Authors:  Orianna Bretschger; Jason B Osterstock; William E Pinchak; Shun'ichi Ishii; Karen E Nelson
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Comparative survey of rumen microbial communities and metabolites across one caprine and three bovine groups, using bar-coded pyrosequencing and ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Hyo Jung Lee; Ji Young Jung; Young Kyoon Oh; Sang-Suk Lee; Eugene L Madsen; Che Ok Jeon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Effects of methanogenic inhibitors on methane production and abundances of methanogens and cellulolytic bacteria in in vitro ruminal cultures.

Authors:  Zhenming Zhou; Qingxiang Meng; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Methane emissions from river buffaloes fed on green fodders in relation to the nutrient [corrected] intake and digestibility.

Authors:  Sonali Prusty; Madhu Mohini; Shivlal Singh Kundu; Ajay Kumar; Chander Datt
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.559

8.  Measurement and prediction of enteric methane emission.

Authors:  Veerasamy Sejian; Rattan Lal; Jeffrey Lakritz; Thaddeus Ezeji
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.787

9.  In vitro reduction of methane production by 3-nitro-1-propionic acid is dose-dependent1.

Authors:  Pedro Antonio Ochoa-García; Martha María Arevalos-Sánchez; Oscar Ruiz-Barrera; Robin C Anderson; Adrián Omar Maynez-Pérez; Felipe A Rodríguez-Almeida; América Chávez-Martínez; Héctor Gutiérrez-Bañuelos; Agustín Corral-Luna
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Effects of eucalyptus oil and anise oil supplementation on rumen fermentation characteristics, methane emission, and digestibility in sheep.

Authors:  Bing Wang; Miao Jia; Luoyun Fang; Linshu Jiang; Yanling Li
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.