| Literature DB >> 23855904 |
Helen M L Wimalarathna1, Judith F Richardson, Andy J Lawson, Richard Elson, Richard Meldrum, Christine L Little, Martin C J Maiden, Noel D McCarthy, Samuel K Sheppard.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is increasing among clinical Campylobacter cases and is common among isolates from other sources, specifically retail poultry - a major source of human infection. In this study the antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates from a UK-wide survey of Campylobacter in retail poultry in 2001 and 2004-5 was investigated. The occurrence of phenotypes resistant to tetracycline, quinolones (ciprofloxacin and naladixic acid), erythromycin, chloramphenicol and aminoglycosides was quantified. This was compared with a phylogeny for these isolates based upon Multi Locus Sequence Typing (MLST) to investigate the pattern of antimicrobial resistance acquisition.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23855904 PMCID: PMC3717071 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Figure 1Proportion of resistant isolates for each antimicrobial. The percentage of resistant C. coli (light grey) and C. jejuni (dark grey) isolates are indicated for samples collected as part of UK retail poultry surveys in 2001 (solid colour) and 2004–5 (dotted). 95% confidence intervals, based on a binomial distribution (resistance: susceptibility) are given for tetracycline (tet), quinolones (quin), erythromycin (ery), chloramphenicol (chl) and aminoglycosides (amino).
Figure 2ClonalFrame genealogies of isolates from UK retail poultry surveys in 2001 and 2004–5. Grey-scale shading indicates the percentage of isolates in each ST with antimicrobial resistance to (A) tetracycline, (B) quinolones - naladixic acid & ciprofloxacin combined, (C) erythromycin, (D) chloramphenicol, (E) aminoglycosides. The scale bar indicates the genetic distance in coalescent units.
Number and percentage of isolates from each lineage that tested resistant to each antimicrobial
| | | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (209) | 828 | 76 (36.4) | 51 (24.40) | 29 (13.88) | 7 (3.35) | 4 (1.91) |
| 2 (187) | 45 | 102 (54.55) | 22 (11.76) | 3 (1.60) | 1 (0.53) | 1 (0.53) |
| 3 (131) | 257 | 40 (30.53) | 28 (21.37) | 1 (0.76) | 2 (1.53) | 2 (1.53) |
| 4 (44) | 433 | 30 (68.18) | 9 (20.45) | 2 (4.55) | 3 (6.82) | 3 (6.82) |
| 5 (21) | 661 | 19 (90.48) | 5 (23.81) | 1 (4.76) | 1 (4.76) | 2 (9.52) |
| 6 (16) | 354 | 7 (43.75) | 6 (37.50) | 0 | 1 (6.25) | 0 |
| 7 (7) | 49 | 4 (57.14) | 3 (42.86) | 1 (14.29) | 1 (14.29) | 0 |
| 8 (5) | 21 | 1 (20.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 (35) | 443 | 32 (91.43) | 15 (42.86) | 3 (8.57) | 2 (8.57) | 1 (2.86) |
| 10 (5) | 574 | 3 (60.00) | 1 (20.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 (8) | 52 | 0 | 1 (12.50) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 (3) | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 (11) | 42 | 2 (18.18) | 2 (18.18) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 (12) | 21 | 4 (33.33) | 3 (25.00) | 0 | 2 (16.67) | 0 |
| 15 (21) | 21 | 8 (38.10) | 3 (14.29) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 (3) | 206 | 3 (100.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 (4) | 508 | 1 (25.00) | 0 | 1 (25.00) | 1 (25.00) | 0 |
| 18 (10) | 353 | 2 (20.00) | 1 (10.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 (10) | 607 | 1 (10.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 (7) | 21 | 2 (28.57) | 6 (85.71) | 0 | 3 (42.86) | 0 |
| 21 (4) | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 (7) | 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 (10) | | 6 (60.00) | 9 (90.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 (3) | | 3 (100.00) | 1 (33.33) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 (2) | 0 | 1 (50.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
1 Lineages are defined as clusters of related genotypes based upon the ClonalFrame genealogy.
2 The clonal complex to which most of the STs belong.
3 Naladixic acid and ciprofloxacin.
Figure 3Permutation test results for the association of lineage with resistance phenotype for the tested antimicrobials. Comparison of a measure of association of resistant lineages with that expected by chance for (A) tetracycline, (B) naladixic acid, (C) ciprofloxacin, (D) erythromycin, (E) chloramphenicol. The arrows show the results from the data compared with frequency histograms of the scores from 10,000 permutations of the data which show the expected distribution of scores if no association exists. No comparison was made for aminoglycosides because too few isolates displayed resistance and so the test had no power.