AIMS: Crates used to transport live poultry can be contaminated with Campylobacter, despite periodic sanitization, and are potential vectors for transmission between flocks. We investigated the microbial contamination of standard and silver ion containing crates in normal use and the genetic structure of associated Campylobacter populations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bacteria from crates were enumerated by appropriate culture techniques, and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was used to determine the genetic structure of Campylobacters isolated from standard and silver ion containing crates. Compared to standard crates, counts of bacteria, including Campylobacter, were consistently lower on silver ion containing crates throughout the decontamination process. In total, 16 different sequence types were identified from 89 Campylobacter jejuni isolates from crates. These were attributed to putative source population (chicken, cattle, sheep, the environment, wild bird) using the population genetic model, structure. Most (89%) were attributed to chicken, with 22% attribution to live chicken and 78% to retail poultry meat. MLST revealed a progressive shift in allele frequencies through the crate decontamination process. Campylobacter on crates survived for at least 3 h after sanitization, a period of time equivalent to the journey from the processing plant to the majority of farms in the catchment, showing the potential for involvement of crates in transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of a silver ion biocide in poultry transportation crates to levels demonstrating acceptable antibacterial activity in vitro reduces the level of bacterial contamination during normal crate use compared to standard crates. Molecular analysis of Campylobacter isolates indicated a change in genetic structure of the population with respect to the poultry-processing plant sanitization practice. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The application of a sustainable antimicrobial to components of poultry processing may contribute to reducing the levels of Campylobacter circulating in poultry.
AIMS: Crates used to transport live poultry can be contaminated with Campylobacter, despite periodic sanitization, and are potential vectors for transmission between flocks. We investigated the microbial contamination of standard and silver ion containing crates in normal use and the genetic structure of associated Campylobacter populations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bacteria from crates were enumerated by appropriate culture techniques, and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was used to determine the genetic structure of Campylobacters isolated from standard and silver ion containing crates. Compared to standard crates, counts of bacteria, including Campylobacter, were consistently lower on silver ion containing crates throughout the decontamination process. In total, 16 different sequence types were identified from 89 Campylobacter jejuni isolates from crates. These were attributed to putative source population (chicken, cattle, sheep, the environment, wild bird) using the population genetic model, structure. Most (89%) were attributed to chicken, with 22% attribution to live chicken and 78% to retail poultry meat. MLST revealed a progressive shift in allele frequencies through the crate decontamination process. Campylobacter on crates survived for at least 3 h after sanitization, a period of time equivalent to the journey from the processing plant to the majority of farms in the catchment, showing the potential for involvement of crates in transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of a silver ion biocide in poultry transportation crates to levels demonstrating acceptable antibacterial activity in vitro reduces the level of bacterial contamination during normal crate use compared to standard crates. Molecular analysis of Campylobacter isolates indicated a change in genetic structure of the population with respect to the poultry-processing plant sanitization practice. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The application of a sustainable antimicrobial to components of poultry processing may contribute to reducing the levels of Campylobacter circulating in poultry.
Authors: M Wittwer; J Keller; T M Wassenaar; R Stephan; D Howald; G Regula; B Bissig-Choisat Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Frances M Colles; Tracey A Jones; Noel D McCarthy; Samuel K Sheppard; Alison J Cody; Kate E Dingle; Marian S Dawkins; Martin C J Maiden Journal: Environ Microbiol Date: 2008-04-10 Impact factor: 5.491
Authors: Samuel K Sheppard; John F Dallas; Marion MacRae; Noel D McCarthy; E L Sproston; F J Gormley; Norval J C Strachan; Iain D Ogden; Martin C J Maiden; Ken J Forbes Journal: Int J Food Microbiol Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 5.277
Authors: Noel D McCarthy; Frances M Colles; Kate E Dingle; Mary C Bagnall; Georgina Manning; Martin C J Maiden; Daniel Falush Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: George Natsos; Niki K Mouttotou; Emmanouil Magiorkinis; Anastasios Ioannidis; Maria Magana; Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou; Konstantinos C Koutoulis Journal: Vet Sci Date: 2021-04-21
Authors: L F Powell; J R Lawes; F A Clifton-Hadley; J Rodgers; K Harris; S J Evans; A Vidal Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 4.434
Authors: Helen M L Wimalarathna; Judith F Richardson; Andy J Lawson; Richard Elson; Richard Meldrum; Christine L Little; Martin C J Maiden; Noel D McCarthy; Samuel K Sheppard Journal: BMC Microbiol Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 3.605
Authors: Rafaela B Morgan; Yuli M Sierra-Arguello; Gustavo Perdoncini; Karen A Borges; Thales Q Furian; Marcos J P Gomes; Diane Lima; Carlos T P Salle; Hamilton L S Moraes; Vladimir P Nascimento Journal: Poult Sci Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 4.014