Literature DB >> 2385486

Contribution of somatosensory information to perception of the visual vertical with body tilt and rotating visual field.

L Yardley1.   

Abstract

This study was designed to explore the role of somatosensory information from the trunk in the perception of the visual vertical. Twelve normal subjects and 1 subject with no somatosensory function below the neck attempted to set a line to the true vertical in the sitting and lying positions, first with a static visual background and then with rotation of the background about the line of sight. The absence of somatosensory information did not affect accuracy when the subjects were in the upright position. When lying horizontally, all control subjects experienced a substantial perceived tilt of the vertical in the direction of body tilt (the A effect), but, in contrast, the subject lacking somatosensory function exhibited a small but consistent apparent tilt of the vertical in the opposite direction (the E effect). This finding is discussed in relation to two competing hypotheses regarding the mechanisms subserving apparent displacement of the subjective vertical in tilted subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2385486     DOI: 10.3758/bf03207079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  9 in total

1.  The "weight" of the gravity organ's signal in the control of perceptual and reflex type orientation at different body positions.

Authors:  H Schöne
Journal:  Fortschr Zool       Date:  1975

2.  Influence of head orientation on visually induced pitch and roll sensation.

Authors:  L R Young; C M Oman; J M Dichgans
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1975-03

3.  The relative effect of saccular and somatosensory information on spatial perception and control.

Authors:  H Mittelstaedt; E Fricke
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1988

4.  Optokinetic-graviceptive interaction in different head positions.

Authors:  J Dichgans; H C Diener; T Brandt
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1974 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Tactile stimulation and perception of the vertical. I. Effects of diffuse vs. specific tactile stimulation.

Authors:  H Nyborg
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  1971

6.  Visual horizontal-perception in relation to otolith-function.

Authors:  E F Miller; A R Fregly; A Graybiel
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1968-12

Review 7.  An ecological theory of orientation and the vestibular system.

Authors:  T A Stoffregen; G E Riccio
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical.

Authors:  H Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1983-06

9.  Eye torsion and the apparent horizon under head tilt and visual field rotation.

Authors:  B H Merker; R Held
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

  9 in total
  13 in total

1.  Head roll dependent variability of subjective visual vertical and ocular counterroll.

Authors:  Alexander A Tarnutzer; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of subjective visual vertical misperception on balance recovery after stroke.

Authors:  I V Bonan; K Hubeaux; M C Gellez-Leman; J P Guichard; E Vicaut; A P Yelnik
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Reference systems for coding spatial information in normal subjects and a deafferented patient.

Authors:  J Blouin; C Bard; N Teasdale; J Paillard; M Fleury; R Forget; Y Lamarre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Sensorimotor and cognitive factors associated with the age-related increase of visual field dependence: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catherine P Agathos; Delphine Bernardin; Delphine Huchet; Anne-Catherine Scherlen; Christine Assaiante; Brice Isableu
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 5.  Movement: How the Brain Communicates with the World.

Authors:  Andrew B Schwartz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Gravity estimation and verticality perception.

Authors:  Christopher J Dakin; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

7.  Non-target stimuli in the visual field influence movement preparation in upper-limb reaching.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Laura J Morris
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Does the integration of haptic and visual cues reduce the effect of a biased visual reference frame on the subjective head orientation?

Authors:  Marc Gueguen; Nicolas Vuillerme; Brice Isableu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Hypermobility Type: Impact of Somatosensory Orthoses on Postural Control (A Pilot Study).

Authors:  Emma G Dupuy; Pascale Leconte; Elodie Vlamynck; Audrey Sultan; Christophe Chesneau; Pierre Denise; Stéphane Besnard; Boris Bienvenu; Leslie M Decker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Differential effects of visual feedback on subjective visual vertical accuracy and precision.

Authors:  Daniel Bjasch; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.