Literature DB >> 26222255

Non-target stimuli in the visual field influence movement preparation in upper-limb reaching.

Kristina A Neely1, Laura J Morris2.   

Abstract

The present work provides an empirical test of the Dynamic Field Theory of visuospatial cognition. The Dynamic Field Theory is a bi-stable neural network model applied to explain how visual information is integrated during the preparation of reaching responses (Erlhagen and Schöner). The dynamic field theory posits that motor cortices develop peaks of activation for each possible target in the visual field. Targets that are close in space produce neural peaks with overlapping distributions, whereas targets that are far apart produce distinct peaks with non-overlapping distributions. As such, the Dynamic Field Theory predicts reaction times to potential targets that are close in space will be faster than those to targets that are far apart. The present work examined how proximal and distal distractors impact reaction time in an upper-limb reaching task. The results demonstrated that distal distractors result in prolonged reaction times compared to proximal distractors. We suggest that reaction time represents the time required to inhibit neural activity representing the location of the distractor. Thus, prolonged reaction times observed for distal distractors reflect the temporal demands associated with the competition of two non-overlapping distributions of activity in the brain. These findings support the tenets of the Dynamic Field Theory and demonstrate that non-target stimuli in the visual field can influence movement preparation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic field theory; Movement preparation; Reaching; Reaction time

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26222255      PMCID: PMC4699436          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.07.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  26 in total

1.  The mechanisms of movement preparation: a precuing study.

Authors:  O Bock; U Eversheim
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Competition between saccade goals in the superior colliculus produces saccade curvature.

Authors:  Robert M McPeek; Jae H Han; Edward L Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Preshaping and continuous evolution of motor cortical representations during movement preparation.

Authors:  Annette Bastian; Gregor Schöner; Alexa Riehle
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 4.  Dynamic field theory of movement preparation.

Authors:  Wolfram Erlhagen; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Contribution of somatosensory information to perception of the visual vertical with body tilt and rotating visual field.

Authors:  L Yardley
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-08

Review 7.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Monkey primary motor and premotor cortex: single-cell activity related to prior information about direction and extent of an intended movement.

Authors:  A Riehle; J Requin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Sighting dominance and egocentric localization.

Authors:  C Porac; S Coren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Trunk orientation as the determining factor of the 'contralateral' deficit in the neglect syndrome and as the physical anchor of the internal representation of body orientation in space.

Authors:  H O Karnath; P Schenkel; B Fischer
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.