Literature DB >> 1078776

Influence of head orientation on visually induced pitch and roll sensation.

L R Young, C M Oman, J M Dichgans.   

Abstract

Observers viewing rotating scenes in their periphery frequently experience self-motion in the opposite direction. A full field (360 degrees) flight simulator projection system was used to investigate the sensations resulting from pitch, roll, and yaw stimuli at various head orientations. Steady yaw rate (circularvection) and development of a constant roll tilt angle, for the head erect and constant velocity yaw and roll stimuli, confirmed previous reports. Pitch stimuli also were found to produce a sensation of tilting to a steady pitch angle, which was much stronger for pitch forward than backward. Pitch and roll effects were strongly dependent on head position, increasing for the head rolled 90 degrees to the side or inverted, and decreasing for the head pitched 25 degrees forward. These results support a hypothesis that visually induced tilt is limited by conflict with otolith information.

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1078776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  30 in total

1.  Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linearvection) basic characteristics and visual-vestibular interactions.

Authors:  A Berthoz; B Pavard; L R Young
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1975-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Parallel processing of multisensory information concerning self-motion.

Authors:  C Maioli; R E Poppele
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visually-induced tilt during parabolic flights.

Authors:  B S Cheung; I P Howard; K E Money
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Contribution of somatosensory information to perception of the visual vertical with body tilt and rotating visual field.

Authors:  L Yardley
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-08

5.  Asymmetry in vestibular responses to cross-coupled stimulus.

Authors:  Jaime Mateus; Jorge Cañizales; Andrew N Hearn; Laurence R Young
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Gravity dependence of the effect of optokinetic stimulation on the subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Christopher J Bockisch; Nicoletta Caramia; Giovanni Bertolini; Alexander Andrea Tarnutzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Perceived orientation, motion, and configuration of the body during viewing of an off-vertical, rotating surface.

Authors:  P A DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-01

8.  State reversals of optically induced tilt and torsional eye movements.

Authors:  R A Finke; R Held
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-04

9.  Visual and somesthetic influences on postural orientation in the median plane.

Authors:  K Nemire; M M Cohen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-01

10.  Spatial orientation: visual-vestibular-somatic interaction.

Authors:  D E Parker; R L Poston; W L Gulledge
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.