Literature DB >> 23845276

Inference for optimal dynamic treatment regimes using an adaptive m-out-of-n bootstrap scheme.

Bibhas Chakraborty1, Eric B Laber, Yingqi Zhao.   

Abstract

A dynamic treatment regime consists of a set of decision rules that dictate how to individualize treatment to patients based on available treatment and covariate history. A common method for estimating an optimal dynamic treatment regime from data is Q-learning which involves nonsmooth operations of the data. This nonsmoothness causes standard asymptotic approaches for inference like the bootstrap or Taylor series arguments to breakdown if applied without correction. Here, we consider the m-out-of-n bootstrap for constructing confidence intervals for the parameters indexing the optimal dynamic regime. We propose an adaptive choice of m and show that it produces asymptotically correct confidence sets under fixed alternatives. Furthermore, the proposed method has the advantage of being conceptually and computationally much simple than competing methods possessing this same theoretical property. We provide an extensive simulation study to compare the proposed method with currently available inference procedures. The results suggest that the proposed method delivers nominal coverage while being less conservative than alternatives. The proposed methods are implemented in the qLearn R-package and have been made available on the Comprehensive R-Archive Network (http://cran.r-project.org/). Analysis of the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study is used as an illustrative example.
© 2013, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic Treatment Regime; Nonregularity; Q-learning; m-Out-of-n Bootstrap

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23845276      PMCID: PMC3864701          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  13 in total

1.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Dynamic treatment regimes: practical design considerations.

Authors:  Philip W Lavori; Ree Dawson
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  A Generalization Error for Q-Learning.

Authors:  Susan A Murphy
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.654

4.  Reinforcement learning design for cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Yufan Zhao; Michael R Kosorok; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Estimating Optimal Dynamic Regimes: Correcting Bias under the Null: [Optimal dynamic regimes: bias correction].

Authors:  Erica E M Moodie; Thomas S Richardson
Journal:  Scand Stat Theory Appl       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 1.396

6.  Adaptive Confidence Intervals for the Test Error in Classification.

Authors:  Eric B Laber; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Placebo-free designs for evaluating new mental health treatments: the use of adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  Ree Dawson; Philip W Lavori
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  Inference for non-regular parameters in optimal dynamic treatment regimes.

Authors:  Bibhas Chakraborty; Susan Murphy; Victor Strecher
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression.

Authors:  A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Hicham M Ibrahim; Thomas J Carmody; Bruce Arnow; Daniel N Klein; John C Markowitz; Philip T Ninan; Susan Kornstein; Rachel Manber; Michael E Thase; James H Kocsis; Martin B Keller
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design.

Authors:  A John Rush; Maurizio Fava; Stephen R Wisniewski; Philip W Lavori; Madhukar H Trivedi; Harold A Sackeim; Michael E Thase; Andrew A Nierenberg; Frederic M Quitkin; T Michael Kashner; David J Kupfer; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Jonathan Alpert; Jonathan W Stewart; Patrick J McGrath; Melanie M Biggs; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Barry D Lebowitz; Louise Ritz; George Niederehe
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-02
View more
  22 in total

1.  iqLearn: Interactive Q-Learning in R.

Authors:  Kristin A Linn; Eric B Laber; Leonard A Stefanski
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 6.440

2.  Q-learning residual analysis: application to the effectiveness of sequences of antipsychotic medications for patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ashkan Ertefaie; Susan Shortreed; Bibhas Chakraborty
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A Bayesian Machine Learning Approach for Optimizing Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Thomas A Murray; Ying Yuan; Peter F Thall
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Bibhas Chakraborty; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Inference about the expected performance of a data-driven dynamic treatment regime.

Authors:  Bibhas Chakraborty; Eric B Laber; Ying-Qi Zhao
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Regularized outcome weighted subgroup identification for differential treatment effects.

Authors:  Yaoyao Xu; Menggang Yu; Ying-Qi Zhao; Quefeng Li; Sijian Wang; Jun Shao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Michael R Kosorok; Eric B Laber
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Penalized Q-Learning for Dynamic Treatment Regimens.

Authors:  R Song; W Wang; D Zeng; M R Kosorok
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.261

9.  Q-learning for estimating optimal dynamic treatment rules from observational data.

Authors:  Erica E M Moodie; Bibhas Chakraborty; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Can J Stat       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 0.875

10.  University of Pennsylvania 6th annual conference on statistical issues in clinical trials: Dynamic treatment regimes (morning session).

Authors:  Keaven Anderson; Marshall Joffe; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.