Literature DB >> 25401119

Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Bibhas Chakraborty1, Susan A Murphy2.   

Abstract

A dynamic treatment regime consists of a sequence of decision rules, one per stage of intervention, that dictate how to individualize treatments to patients based on evolving treatment and covariate history. These regimes are particularly useful for managing chronic disorders, and fit well into the larger paradigm of personalized medicine. They provide one way to operationalize a clinical decision support system. Statistics plays a key role in the construction of evidence-based dynamic treatment regimes - informing best study design as well as efficient estimation and valid inference. Due to the many novel methodological challenges it offers, this area has been growing in popularity among statisticians in recent years. In this article, we review the key developments in this exciting field of research. In particular, we discuss the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial designs, estimation techniques like Q-learning and marginal structural models, and several inference techniques designed to address the associated non-standard asymptotics. We reference software, whenever available. We also outline some important future directions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Q-learning; dynamic treatment regime; non-regularity; reinforcement learning; sequential randomization

Year:  2014        PMID: 25401119      PMCID: PMC4231831          DOI: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-022513-115553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl        ISSN: 2326-8298            Impact factor:   5.810


  50 in total

1.  Weighted Kaplan-Meier estimators for two-stage treatment regimes.

Authors:  Sachiko Miyahara; Abdus S Wahed
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Covariate-adjusted adaptive randomization in a sarcoma trial with multi-stage treatments.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; J Kyle Wathen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Analysis of randomized comparative clinical trial data for personalized treatment selections.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Lu Tian; Peggy H Wong; L J Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Estimation and extrapolation of optimal treatment and testing strategies.

Authors:  James Robins; Liliana Orellana; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  A "SMART" design for building individualized treatment sequences.

Authors:  H Lei; I Nahum-Shani; K Lynch; D Oslin; S A Murphy
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 18.561

7.  Model predictive control of erythropoietin administration in the anemia of ESRD.

Authors:  Adam E Gaweda; Alfred A Jacobs; George R Aronoff; Michael E Brier
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Adaptive therapy for androgen-independent prostate cancer: a randomized selection trial of four regimens.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Christopher Logothetis; Lance C Pagliaro; Sijin Wen; Melissa A Brown; Dallas Williams; Randall E Millikan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes from a Classification Perspective.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Min Zhang; Eric Laber
Journal:  Stat       Date:  2012-01-01

10.  Evaluation of Viable Dynamic Treatment Regimes in a Sequentially Randomized Trial of Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Andrea Rotnitzky; Xihong Lin; Randall E Millikan; Peter F Thall
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.033

View more
  32 in total

1.  Identifying a set that contains the best dynamic treatment regimes.

Authors:  Ashkan Ertefaie; Tianshuang Wu; Kevin G Lynch; Inbal Nahum-Shani
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Treatment Burden and Treatment Fatigue as Barriers to Health.

Authors:  Bryan W Heckman; Amanda R Mathew; Matthew J Carpenter
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2015-10-01

3.  Power analysis in a SMART design: sample size estimation for determining the best embedded dynamic treatment regime.

Authors:  William J Artman; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Tianshuang Wu; James R Mckay; Ashkan Ertefaie
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  A control systems engineering approach for adaptive behavioral interventions: illustration with a fibromyalgia intervention.

Authors:  Sunil Deshpande; Daniel E Rivera; Jarred W Younger; Naresh N Nandola
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  A Bayesian Machine Learning Approach for Optimizing Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Thomas A Murray; Ying Yuan; Peter F Thall
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Quantile-Optimal Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Lan Wang; Yu Zhou; Rui Song; Ben Sherwood
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Estimating individualized treatment regimes from crossover designs.

Authors:  Crystal T Nguyen; Daniel J Luckett; Anna R Kahkoska; Grace E Shearrer; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Jaimie N Davis; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Empirical Anti-MRSA vs Standard Antibiotic Therapy and Risk of 30-Day Mortality in Patients Hospitalized for Pneumonia.

Authors:  Barbara Ellen Jones; Jian Ying; Vanessa Stevens; Candace Haroldsen; Tao He; McKenna Nevers; Matthew A Christensen; Richard E Nelson; Gregory J Stoddard; Brian C Sauer; Peter M Yarbrough; Makoto M Jones; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Tom Greene; Matthew H Samore
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 9.  Recommendations for the Design and Analysis of Treatment Trials for Alcohol Use Disorders.

Authors:  Katie Witkiewitz; John W Finney; Alex H S Harris; Daniel R Kivlahan; Henry R Kranzler
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Noninferiority and equivalence tests in sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials (SMARTs).

Authors:  Palash Ghosh; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Bonnie Spring; Bibhas Chakraborty
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2019-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.