Literature DB >> 20526433

Estimating Optimal Dynamic Regimes: Correcting Bias under the Null: [Optimal dynamic regimes: bias correction].

Erica E M Moodie1, Thomas S Richardson.   

Abstract

A dynamic regime provides a sequence of treatments that are tailored to patient-specific characteristics and outcomes. In 2004 James Robins proposed g-estimation using structural nested mean models for making inference about the optimal dynamic regime in a multi-interval trial. The method provides clear advantages over traditional parametric approaches. Robins' g-estimation method always yields consistent estimators, but these can be asymptotically biased under a given structural nested mean model for certain longitudinal distributions of the treatments and covariates, termed exceptional laws. In fact, under the null hypothesis of no treatment effect, every distribution constitutes an exceptional law under structural nested mean models which allow for interaction of current treatment with past treatments or covariates. This paper provides an explanation of exceptional laws and describes a new approach to g-estimation which we call Zeroing Instead of Plugging In (ZIPI). ZIPI provides nearly identical estimators to recursive g-estimators at non-exceptional laws while providing substantial reduction in the bias at an exceptional law when decision rule parameters are not shared across intervals.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20526433      PMCID: PMC2880540          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2009.00661.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Stat Theory Appl        ISSN: 0303-6898            Impact factor:   1.396


  5 in total

1.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Feeding effects on growth during infancy.

Authors:  Michael S Kramer; Tong Guo; Robert W Platt; Irina Vanilovich; Zinaida Sevkovskaya; Irina Dzikovich; Kim F Michaelsen; Kathryn Dewey
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions.

Authors:  Linda M Collins; Susan A Murphy; Victor Strecher
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Demystifying optimal dynamic treatment regimes.

Authors:  Erica E M Moodie; Thomas S Richardson; David A Stephens
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Estimation and extrapolation of optimal treatment and testing strategies.

Authors:  James Robins; Liliana Orellana; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

  5 in total
  21 in total

1.  Q-learning residual analysis: application to the effectiveness of sequences of antipsychotic medications for patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ashkan Ertefaie; Susan Shortreed; Bibhas Chakraborty
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Q- and A-learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Phillip J Schulte; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Eric B Laber; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.901

3.  Quantile-Optimal Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Lan Wang; Yu Zhou; Rui Song; Ben Sherwood
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Regularized outcome weighted subgroup identification for differential treatment effects.

Authors:  Yaoyao Xu; Menggang Yu; Ying-Qi Zhao; Quefeng Li; Sijian Wang; Jun Shao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Michael R Kosorok; Eric B Laber
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Estimating optimal shared-parameter dynamic regimens with application to a multistage depression clinical trial.

Authors:  Bibhas Chakraborty; Palash Ghosh; Erica E M Moodie; A John Rush
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Comment on "Dynamic treatment regimes: technical challenges and applications"

Authors:  Yair Goldberg; Rui Song; Donglin Zeng; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.125

Review 8.  Inference for non-regular parameters in optimal dynamic treatment regimes.

Authors:  Bibhas Chakraborty; Susan Murphy; Victor Strecher
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial design of neurobehavioral treatment for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma undergoing high-dose interferon-alpha therapy.

Authors:  S Freda Auyeung; Qi Long; Erica Bruce Royster; Smitha Murthy; Marcia D McNutt; David Lawson; Andrew Miller; Amita Manatunga; Dominique L Musselman
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Q-learning for estimating optimal dynamic treatment rules from observational data.

Authors:  Erica E M Moodie; Bibhas Chakraborty; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Can J Stat       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 0.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.