Literature DB >> 23838932

Usefulness of drain amylase, serum C-reactive protein levels and body temperature to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Masahide Hiyoshi1, Kazuo Chijiiwa, Yoshiro Fujii, Naoya Imamura, Motoaki Nagano, Jiro Ohuchida.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a worrisome and life-threatening complication. Recently, early drain removal has been recommended as a means of preventing POPF. The present study sought to determine how to distinguish clinical POPF from non-clinical POPF in the early postoperative period after PD to aid in early drain removal.
METHODS: From March 2002 through December 2010, 176 patients underwent PD and were enrolled in this study to examine factors predictive of clinical POPF after PD. POPF was defined and classified according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery guideline, and grade B/C POPF was defined as clinical POPF.
RESULTS: Grade A POPF occurred in 39 (22.2 %) patients, grade B in 19 (10.8 %) patients, and grade C in 11 (6.3 %) patients. Clinical POPF (grade B/C) occurred in 17.1 % of patients. Multivariate analysis revealed male gender and body mass index (BMI) ≥22.5 kg/m(2) to be the independent preoperative risk factors predictive of POPF. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the combination of drain amylase ≥750 IU/L, C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥20 mg/dL, and body temperature ≥37.5 °C on postoperative day 3 could effectively distinguish clinical POPF from non-clinical POPF. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 84.6, 98.2, and 95.7 %, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Male gender and BMI ≥22.5 were the independent preoperative predictive risk factors for POPF. We assume that when amylase is <750 IU/L, serum CRP is <20 mg/dL, and body temperature is <37.5 °C the drain can safely be removed, even if POPF is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23838932     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2149-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  35 in total

1.  The risk for immediate postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy is increased by high frequency of acinar cells and decreased by prevalent fibrosis of the cut edge of pancreas.

Authors:  Matias Laaninen; Merja Bläuer; Kaija Vasama; Haitao Jin; Sari Räty; Juhani Sand; Isto Nordback; Johanna Laukkarinen
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 2.  Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Keyvan Tadjalli-Mehr; Keyvan-Tadjalli Mehr; Moritz N Wente; Meinhard Kieser; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Comparative study of gastric emptying and nutritional status after pylorus-preserving vs. subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Masahide Hiyoshi; Kazuo Chijiiwa; Jiro Ohuchida; Naoya Imamura; Motoaki Nagano
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2012-06

4.  Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico- duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying.

Authors:  G Balzano; A Zerbi; M Braga; S Rocchetti; A A Beneduce; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Use of omentum or falciform ligament does not decrease complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: nationwide survey of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery.

Authors:  Masaji Tani; Manabu Kawai; Seiko Hirono; Takashi Hatori; Toshihide Imaizumi; Akimasa Nakao; Shinichi Egawa; Takehide Asano; Takukazu Nagakawa; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Patrick Pessaux; Alain Sauvanet; Christophe Mariette; François Paye; Fabrice Muscari; Antonio Sa Cunha; Bernard Sastre; Jean-Pierre Arnaud
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  How do we predict the clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy?--an analysis in 244 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Masaji Tani; Seiko Hirono; Shinomi Ina; Motoki Miyazawa; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Increased serum levels of C-reactive protein precede anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Guido Woeste; Christine Müller; Wolf O Bechstein; Christoph Wullstein
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections.

Authors:  Emre F Yekebas; Lars Wolfram; Guellue Cataldegirmen; Christian R Habermann; Dean Bogoevski; Alexandra M Koenig; Jussuf Kaifi; Paulus G Schurr; Michael Bubenheim; Claus Nolte-Ernsting; Gerhard Adam; Jakob R Izbicki
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Utility of drain fluid amylase measurement on the first postoperative day after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Robert P Sutcliffe; Narendra Battula; Ali Haque; Amir Ali; Parthi Srinivasan; Simon W Atkinson; Mohamed Rela; Nigel D Heaton; Andreas A Prachalias
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  23 in total

1.  Plasma desacyl ghrelin-to-acyl ghrelin ratio is a predictor of postoperative complications and prognosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Takahiro Nishida; Hironobu Tsubouchi; Takeomi Hamada; Naoya Imamura; Masahide Hiyoshi; Koichi Yano; Kenji Kangawa; Masamitsu Nakazato; Atsushi Nanashima
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Preoperative Nutritional Assessment Using the Controlling Nutritional Status Score to Predict Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Masashi Utsumi; Hideki Aoki; Seichi Nagahisa; Seitaro Nishimura; Yuta Une; Yuji Kimura; Fumitaka Taniguchi; Takashi Arata; Koh Katsuda; Kohji Tanakaya
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Stent Placement for Portal Vein Stenosis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Masahide Hiyoshi; Yoshiro Fujii; Kazuhiro Kondo; Naoya Imamura; Motoaki Nagano; Jiro Ohuchida
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Defining post-operative pancreatitis as a new pancreatic specific complication following pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Saxon Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  C-Reactive Protein on Postoperative Day 1 Is a Reliable Predictor of Pancreas-Specific Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Théophile Guilbaud; David Jérémie Birnbaum; Coralie Lemoine; Mircea Chirica; Olivier Risse; Stéphane Berdah; Edouard Girard; Vincent Moutardier
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  A High Abdominal Aortic Calcification Score on CT is a Risk Factor for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula in Elderly Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Nao Kakizawa; Hiroshi Noda; Fumiaki Watanabe; Kosuke Ichida; Koichi Suzuki; Toshiki Rikiyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Amylase in drain fluid for the diagnosis of pancreatic leak in post-pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Tsetsegdemberel Bat-Ulzii Davidson; Mohammad Yaghoobi; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-07

8.  Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guoli Chen; Haizhao Yi; Jinguang Zhang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-12

9.  A Cohort Study for Derivation and Validation of Early Detection of Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Kazuki Takeishi; Takashi Maeda; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Eiji Tsujita; Shinji Itoh; Norifumi Harimoto; Toru Ikegami; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Ken Shirabe; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Is routine drainage necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Yong-Jian Jiang; Ji Li; Feng Yang; Yang Di; Lie Yao; Chen Jin; De-Liang Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.