Literature DB >> 29327310

C-Reactive Protein on Postoperative Day 1 Is a Reliable Predictor of Pancreas-Specific Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Théophile Guilbaud1, David Jérémie Birnbaum2, Coralie Lemoine3, Mircea Chirica4, Olivier Risse4, Stéphane Berdah2, Edouard Girard4, Vincent Moutardier2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula and pancreas-specific complications have a significant influence on patient management and outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy. The aim of the study was to assess the value of serum C-reactive protein on the postoperative day 1 as early predictor of pancreatic fistula and pancreas-specific complications.
METHODS: Between 2013 and 2016, 110 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Clinical, biological, intraoperative, and pathological characteristics were prospectively recorded. Pancreatic fistula was graded according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula classification. A composite endpoint was defined as pancreas-specific complications including pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscess, postoperative hemorrhage, and bile leak. The diagnostic accuracy of serum C-reactive protein on postoperative day 1 in predicting adverse postoperative outcomes was assessed by ROC curve analysis.
RESULTS: Six patients (5%) died and 87 (79%) experienced postoperative complications (pancreatic-specific complications: n = 58 (53%); pancreatic fistula: n = 48 (44%)). A soft pancreatic gland texture, a main pancreatic duct diameter < 3 mm and serum C-reactive protein ≥ 100 mg/L on postoperative day 1 were independent predictors of pancreas-specific complications (p < 0.01) and pancreatic fistula (p < 0.01). ROC analysis showed that serum C-reactive protein ≥ 100 mg/L on postoperative day 1 was a significant predictor of pancreatic fistula (AUC: 0.70; 95%CI: 0.60-0.79, p < 0.01) and pancreas-specific complications (AUC: 0.72; 95%CI: 0.62-0.82, p < 0.01). ROC analysis showed that serum C-reactive protein ≥ 50 mg/L at discharge was a significant predictor of 90-day hospital readmission (AUC: 0.70; 95%CI: 0.60-0.79, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: C-reactive protein levels reliably predict risks of pancreatic fistula, pancreas-specific complications, and hospital readmission, and should be inserted in risk-stratified management algorithms after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  90-day readmission; C-reactive protein; Pancreas-specific complications; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Postoperative pancreatic fistula

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29327310     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3658-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  60 in total

Review 1.  Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Keyvan Tadjalli-Mehr; Keyvan-Tadjalli Mehr; Moritz N Wente; Meinhard Kieser; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; Meghan A Arnold; David C Chang; Joann Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Ralph H Hruban; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Marchegiani; Christos Dervenis; Micheal Sarr; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Mustapha Adham; Peter Allen; Roland Andersson; Horacio J Asbun; Marc G Besselink; Kevin Conlon; Marco Del Chiaro; Massimo Falconi; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Abe Fingerhut; Helmut Friess; Dirk J Gouma; Thilo Hackert; Jakob Izbicki; Keith D Lillemoe; John P Neoptolemos; Attila Olah; Richard Schulick; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Tadahiro Takada; Kyoichi Takaori; William Traverso; Charles R Vollmer; Christopher L Wolfgang; Charles J Yeo; Roberto Salvia; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Daniel J Kagedan; Mahrosh Ahmed; Katharine S Devitt; Alice C Wei
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 5.  Outcomes following resection of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Elan R Witkowski; Jillian K Smith; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Serum amylase and C-reactive protein in risk stratification of pancreas-specific complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  L K Palani Velu; C J McKay; C R Carter; D C McMillan; N B Jamieson; E J Dickson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Severe Jaundice Increases Early Severe Morbidity and Decreases Long-Term Survival after Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Alain Sauvanet; Jean-Marie Boher; François Paye; Philippe Bachellier; Antonio Sa Cuhna; Yves-Patrice Le Treut; Mustapha Adham; Jean-Yves Mabrut; Laurence Chiche; Jean-Robert Delpero
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 8.  Postoperative drain amylase predicts pancreatic fistula in pancreatic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ji Yang; Qiang Huang; Chao Wang
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 6.071

9.  Diagnostic value of abdominal drainage in individual risk assessment of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  C Ansorge; J Z Nordin; L Lundell; L Strömmer; E Rangelova; J Blomberg; M Del Chiaro; R Segersvärd
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage.

Authors:  George Van Buren; Mark Bloomston; Steven J Hughes; Jordan Winter; Stephen W Behrman; Nicholas J Zyromski; Charles Vollmer; Vic Velanovich; Taylor Riall; Peter Muscarella; Jose Trevino; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Kevin Behrns; E Christopher Ellison; Omar Barakat; Kyle A Perry; Jeffrey Drebin; Michael House; Sherif Abdel-Misih; Eric J Silberfein; Steven Goldin; Kimberly Brown; Somala Mohammed; Sally E Hodges; Amy McElhany; Mehdi Issazadeh; Eunji Jo; Qianxing Mo; William E Fisher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  4 in total

1.  Delayed post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage and bleeding recurrence after percutaneous endovascular treatment: risk factors from a bi-centric study of 307 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Georges Farvacque; Théophile Guilbaud; Anderson Dieudonné Loundou; Ugo Scemamma; Stéphane Victor Berdah; Vincent Moutardier; Mircea Chirica; Olivier Risse; Edouard Girard; David Jérémie Birnbaum
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guoli Chen; Haizhao Yi; Jinguang Zhang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-12

3.  C-reactive protein identifies patients at risk of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage.

Authors:  C Vilhav; J B Fagman; E Holmberg; P Naredi; C Engström
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Comprehensive Diagnostic Nomogram for Predicting Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Bo Li; Ning Pu; Qiangda Chen; Yong Mei; Dansong Wang; Dayong Jin; Wenchuan Wu; Lei Zhang; Wenhui Lou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.