Literature DB >> 21982073

Use of omentum or falciform ligament does not decrease complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: nationwide survey of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery.

Masaji Tani1, Manabu Kawai, Seiko Hirono, Takashi Hatori, Toshihide Imaizumi, Akimasa Nakao, Shinichi Egawa, Takehide Asano, Takukazu Nagakawa, Hiroki Yamaue.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wrapping is thought to prevent pancreatic fistula and postoperative hemorrhage for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and we analyzed whether omentum/falciform ligament wrapping decreases postoperative complications after PD.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of wrapping using the omentum/falciform ligament in patients that underwent PD between January 2006 and June 2008 in 139 institutions that were members of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery.
RESULTS: Ninety-one institutions responded to the questionnaires, and data were accumulated from 3,288 patients. The data from 2,597 patients were acceptable for analysis; 918 (35.3%) patients underwent wrapping and 1,679 patients did not. A pancreatic fistula occurred in 623 patients (37.3%) in the nonwrapping group, in comparison to 393 patients (42.8%) in the wrapping group (P = .006). The incidence of a grade B/C pancreatic fistula was lower in the nonwrapping group than the wrapping group (16.7% vs. 21.5%; P = .002). An intra-abdominal hemorrhage occurred in 54 patients (3.2%) in the nonwrapping group, which was similar to the incidence in the wrapping group (32 patients; 3.5%). The mortality was 1.3% and 1.0% in nonwrapping and wrapping groups, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed 7 independent risk factors for pancreatic fistula; male, hypoalbuminemia, soft pancreas, long operation time, extended resection, pylorus preservation, and omentum wrapping. There were 4 independent risk factors for early intra-abdominal hemorrhage and 2 independent risk factors for late intra-abdominal hemorrhage.
CONCLUSION: This retrospective study revealed that omentum wrapping did not decrease the incidence of pancreatic fistula. An additional validation study is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of wrapping for PD.
Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21982073     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  24 in total

1.  Pancreaticodigestive anastomosis and the postoperative management strategies to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Daisuke Hashimoto; Akira Chikamoto; Masaki Ohmuraya; Masahiko Hirota; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Novel diagnostics for aggravating pancreatic fistulas at the acute phase after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Mitsuro Kanda; Tsutomu Fujii; Hideki Takami; Masaya Suenaga; Yoshikuni Inokawa; Suguru Yamada; Daisuke Kobayashi; Chie Tanaka; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masahiko Koike; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Pancreatoduodenectomy - preventing complications.

Authors:  Prasanth Penumadu; Savio G Barreto; Mahesh Goel; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-01-19

Review 4.  Applications of hepatic round ligament/falciform ligament flap and graft in abdominal surgery-a review of their utility and efficacy.

Authors:  Vasudevan Baskaran; Jayant Kumar Banerjee; Sita Ram Ghosh; Sukumar Santosh Kumar; Subramaniam Anand; Govind Menon; Deep Shikha Mishra; Ramanathan Saranga Bharathi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Preoperative imaging evaluation of pancreatic pathologies for the objective prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Tajima; Yasunari Kawabata; Noriyuki Hirahara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Application of air insufflation to prevent clinical pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hui Yang; Xiao-Fei Lu; Yun-Fei Xu; Hong-Da Liu; Sen Guo; Yi Liu; Yu-Xin Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Number of acinar cells at the pancreatic stump predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Naoki Umezaki; Daisuke Hashimoto; Shigeki Nakagawa; Yuki Kitano; Kensuke Yamamura; Akira Chikamoto; Fujio Matsumura; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Superior perianastomotic fluid collection in the early postoperative period affects pseudoaneurysm occurrence after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Maehira; Hiroya Iida; Haruki Mori; Daiki Yasukawa; Takeru Maekawa; Keiji Muramoto; Katsushi Takebayashi; Sachiko Kaida; Toru Miyake; Masaji Tani
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Usefulness of drain amylase, serum C-reactive protein levels and body temperature to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Masahide Hiyoshi; Kazuo Chijiiwa; Yoshiro Fujii; Naoya Imamura; Motoaki Nagano; Jiro Ohuchida
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  "Wrapping the gastroduodenal artery stump" during pancreatoduodenectomy reduced the stump hemorrhage incidence after operation.

Authors:  Chang Xu; Xinwei Yang; Xiangji Luo; Feng Shen; Mengchao Wu; Weifeng Tan; Xiaoqing Jiang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.