OBJECTIVE: To analyze deformation of the perineum during normal vaginal delivery in order to identify clinical steps that might be beneficial when executing manual perineal protection. METHODS: The present prospective study at Charles University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic, enrolled 10 primiparous women at term undergoing non-instrumental vaginal delivery assisted by the same obstetrician between September 2009 and September 2010. A modified hands-poised technique performed concurrently with stereophotogrammetry was used to analyze and quantify perineal deformation and strain at the final stage of delivery. RESULTS: The highest tissue strain (mean, 177%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 106.3-248.5) was in a transverse direction and occurred at the level of the fourchette (i.e. 1cm was transversely stretched and deformed to 2.77 cm during the final stage of vaginal delivery). This strain was more than 4 times higher than the maximum anteroposterior strain (mean, 43%; 95% CI, 28.6-57.4). CONCLUSION: On the basis of these stereophotogrammetry data, a technique of perineal protection executed by fingers of the posterior (right) hand can be proposed. Further experimental and clinical studies are needed to evaluate whether this technique might assist in reducing obstetric perineal trauma.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze deformation of the perineum during normal vaginal delivery in order to identify clinical steps that might be beneficial when executing manual perineal protection. METHODS: The present prospective study at Charles University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic, enrolled 10 primiparous women at term undergoing non-instrumental vaginal delivery assisted by the same obstetrician between September 2009 and September 2010. A modified hands-poised technique performed concurrently with stereophotogrammetry was used to analyze and quantify perineal deformation and strain at the final stage of delivery. RESULTS: The highest tissue strain (mean, 177%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 106.3-248.5) was in a transverse direction and occurred at the level of the fourchette (i.e. 1cm was transversely stretched and deformed to 2.77 cm during the final stage of vaginal delivery). This strain was more than 4 times higher than the maximum anteroposterior strain (mean, 43%; 95% CI, 28.6-57.4). CONCLUSION: On the basis of these stereophotogrammetry data, a technique of perineal protection executed by fingers of the posterior (right) hand can be proposed. Further experimental and clinical studies are needed to evaluate whether this technique might assist in reducing obstetric perineal trauma.
Authors: Magdalena Jansova; Vladimir Kalis; Zdenek Rusavy; Robert Zemcik; Libor Lobovsky; Katariina Laine Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2013-07-09 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Magdalena Jansova; Vladimir Kalis; Zdenek Rusavy; Sari Räisänen; Libor Lobovsky; Katariina Laine Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Vladimir Kalis; Zdenek Rusavy; Linda Havelkova; Tomas Zitka; David Tolar; Khaled M Ismail Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Ladislav Krofta; Linda Havelková; Iva Urbánková; Michal Krčmář; Luděk Hynčík; Jaroslav Feyereisl Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 2.894