Literature DB >> 23834484

Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors.

I Gurol-Urganci1, D A Cromwell, L C Edozien, T A Mahmood, E J Adams, D H Richmond, A Templeton, J H van der Meulen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the trends of severe perineal tears in England and to investigate to what extent the changes in related risk factors could explain the observed trends.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of singleton deliveries from a national administrative database.
SETTING: The English National Health Service between 1 April 2000 and 31 March 2012. POPULATION: A cohort of 1 035 253 primiparous women who had a singleton, term, cephalic, vaginal birth.
METHODS: Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the impact of financial year of birth (labelled by starting year), adjusting for major risk factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The rate of third-degree (anal sphincter is torn) or fourth-degree (anal sphincter as well as rectal mucosa are torn) perineal tears.
RESULTS: The rate of reported third- or fourth-degree perineal tears tripled from 1.8 to 5.9% during the study period. The rate of episiotomy varied between 30 and 36%. An increasing proportion of ventouse deliveries (from 67.8 to 78.6%) and non-instrumental deliveries (from 15.1 to 19.1%) were assisted by an episiotomy. A higher risk of third- or fourth-degree perineal tears was associated with a maternal age above 25 years, instrumental delivery (forceps and ventouse), especially without episiotomy, Asian ethnicity, a more affluent socio-economic status, higher birthweight, and shoulder dystocia.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in major risk factors are unlikely explanations for the observed increase in the rate of third- or fourth-degree tears. The improved recognition of tears following the implementation of a standardised classification of perineal tears is the most likely explanation.
© 2013 RCOG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Episiotomy; instrumental delivery; severe perineal trauma; trends; vaginal delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23834484     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  74 in total

1.  Risk factors for severe obstetric perineal lacerations.

Authors:  Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro; Gláucia M Varella Pereira; Regina Amélia Pessoa Aguiar; Rodrigo Leite Azevedo; Mário Dias Correia-Junior; Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Can we predict and prevent pelvic floor dysfunction?

Authors:  Ian Milsom
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Management of 3rd and 4th Degree Perineal Tears after Vaginal Birth. German Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (AWMF Registry No. 015/079, October 2014).

Authors:  T Aigmueller; W Bader; K Beilecke; K Elenskaia; A Frudinger; E Hanzal; H Helmer; H Huemer; M van der Kleyn; D Koelle; S Kropshofer; J Pfeiffer; C Reisenauer; A Tammaa; K Tamussino; W Umek
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 4.  Perineal care.

Authors:  Julie Frohlich; Christine Kettle
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-03-10

Review 5.  Vacuum extraction vaginal delivery: current trend and safety.

Authors:  Jihan Jeon; Sunghun Na
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2017-10-23

Review 6.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.

Authors:  Dharmesh S Kapoor; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study.

Authors:  Nivedita Gauthaman; Denise Henry; Irina Chis Ster; Azar Khunda; Stergios K Doumouchtsis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Comparative study of episiotomy angles achieved by cutting with straight Mayo scissors and the EPISCISSORS-60 in a birth simulation model.

Authors:  Yves van Roon; Latha Vinayakarao; Louise Melson; Rebecca Percival; Sangeeta Pathak; Ashish Pradhan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Reducing obstetric anal sphincter injuries using perineal support: our preliminary experience.

Authors:  Madhu Naidu; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  The optimal angle of the mediolateral episiotomy at crowning of the head during labor.

Authors:  Shimon Ginath; Osnat Elyashiv; Eran Weiner; Ron Sagiv; Jacob Bar; Joseph Menczer; Michal Kovo; Alexander Condrea
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.