Literature DB >> 28477150

The optimal angle of the mediolateral episiotomy at crowning of the head during labor.

Shimon Ginath1,2, Osnat Elyashiv3, Eran Weiner3, Ron Sagiv3, Jacob Bar3, Joseph Menczer3, Michal Kovo3, Alexander Condrea3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the mediolateral episiotomy incision is to increase the diameter of the soft tissue of the vaginal outlet to facilitate birth and to prevent vaginal tears. Episiotomy angles that are too narrow and close to the midline increase the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. In order to determine the optimal angle of the episiotomy, we assessed the changes in the angles of episiotomy lines marked during the first stage of labor and measured at the time of crowning of the head.
METHODS: Incision lines for mediolateral episiotomy were marked on the perineal skin at angles of 30°, 45°, and 60° from the midline during the first stage of labor in women with a singleton pregnancy. The angles of the marked lines were measured at crowning of the head. Mediolateral episiotomy was performed only for obstetric indications.
RESULTS: The study included 102 women with a singleton pregnancy. Of these women, 50 were primiparous and 52 were multiparous. All angles marked during the first stage of labor increased significantly (by more than 30°) at crowning of the head. Similar changes were observed in primiparous and multiparous women.
CONCLUSIONS: The angle of the mediolateral episiotomy line was significantly greater at crowning of the head than when marked during the first stage of labor. To achieve the desired episiotomy angle, it is important to take into consideration the changes in mediolateral episiotomy angles that occur during labor.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crowning; Incision angle; Mediolateral episiotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28477150     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3349-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  22 in total

Review 1.  Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology.

Authors:  V Kalis; K Laine; J W de Leeuw; K M Ismail; D G Tincello
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?

Authors:  M Eogan; L Daly; P R O'Connell; C O'Herlihy
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Episiotomy: what's the angle?

Authors:  John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  The incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy before delivery and after repair.

Authors:  Vladimir Kalis; Jaroslava Karbanova; Miroslav Horak; Libor Lobovsky; Milena Kralickova; Zdenek Rokyta
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Obstetric anal sphincter injury risk factors and the role of the mediolateral episiotomy.

Authors:  Emily Twidale; Kristin Cornell; Nicholas Litzow; Anne Hotchin
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.100

6.  Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study.

Authors:  Vasanth Andrews; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar; Peter W Jones
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.689

7.  A comparison between midline and mediolateral episiotomies.

Authors:  P M Coats; K K Chan; M Wilkins; R J Beard
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1980-05

8.  Differences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors.

Authors:  Douglas G Tincello; Abimbola Williams; Gillian E Fowler; Elisabeth J Adams; David H Richmond; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case-control study.

Authors:  M Stedenfeldt; J Pirhonen; E Blix; T Wilsgaard; B Vonen; P Øian
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 10.  Risk factors for recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Swati Jha; Victoria Parker
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.894

View more
  1 in total

1.  Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sandra Bergendahl; Victoria Ankarcrona; Åsa Leijonhufvud; Susanne Hesselman; Sofie Karlström; Helena Kopp Kallner; Sophia Brismar Wendel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.