PURPOSE: Few studies have been conducted on the serial evaluation of predictors for recovery of urinary continence (RC) after radical prostatectomy (RP) among same cohort. We developed and validated nomograms to predict immediate (≤1), early (≤3), and late (≤12 months) RC from a contemporary series and compared each nomogram with regard to the significance of predictors for RC. METHODS: Among consecutive men who received robot-assisted or open retropubic RP between 2004 and 2011, 872 (74.7 %) and 296 (25.3 %) were randomly assigned to subcohorts for the development of nomograms and for the split-sample external validation. The final multivariate model was selected based on the stepwise procedure, and the regression coefficient-based nomograms were developed based on final models. RESULTS: Age at surgery, membranous urethral length (MUL), and robot-assisted RP were significant for RC at 1, 3, and 12 months. Saving the neurovascular bundle (NVB) and prostate volume were significant only for RC at 12 months. Odds ratios for age and MUL were constant over time, whereas the odds ratio for robot-assisted surgery decreased over time. Each developed nomogram was reasonably well fitted to the ideal line of the calibration plot. The split-sample external validation of nomograms indicated 63, 65, 71 % accuracy for each RC time point. CONCLUSIONS: We developed nomograms for RC at each time point after RP and validated adequately. Saving the NVB and prostate volume may affect only late RC after RP. In contrast, age, MUL, and robot-assisted surgery seem to be consistently associated with immediate, early, and late RC.
PURPOSE: Few studies have been conducted on the serial evaluation of predictors for recovery of urinary continence (RC) after radical prostatectomy (RP) among same cohort. We developed and validated nomograms to predict immediate (≤1), early (≤3), and late (≤12 months) RC from a contemporary series and compared each nomogram with regard to the significance of predictors for RC. METHODS: Among consecutive men who received robot-assisted or open retropubic RP between 2004 and 2011, 872 (74.7 %) and 296 (25.3 %) were randomly assigned to subcohorts for the development of nomograms and for the split-sample external validation. The final multivariate model was selected based on the stepwise procedure, and the regression coefficient-based nomograms were developed based on final models. RESULTS: Age at surgery, membranous urethral length (MUL), and robot-assisted RP were significant for RC at 1, 3, and 12 months. Saving the neurovascular bundle (NVB) and prostate volume were significant only for RC at 12 months. Odds ratios for age and MUL were constant over time, whereas the odds ratio for robot-assisted surgery decreased over time. Each developed nomogram was reasonably well fitted to the ideal line of the calibration plot. The split-sample external validation of nomograms indicated 63, 65, 71 % accuracy for each RC time point. CONCLUSIONS: We developed nomograms for RC at each time point after RP and validated adequately. Saving the NVB and prostate volume may affect only late RC after RP. In contrast, age, MUL, and robot-assisted surgery seem to be consistently associated with immediate, early, and late RC.
Authors: Ricarda M Bauer; Christian Gozzi; Wilhelm Hübner; Victor W Nitti; Giacomo Novara; Andrew Peterson; Jaspreet S Sandhu; Christian G Stief Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Emilio Sacco; Tommaso Prayer-Galetti; Francesco Pinto; Simonetta Fracalanza; Giovanni Betto; Francesco Pagano; Walter Artibani Journal: BJU Int Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Christian von Bodman; Kazuhito Matsushita; Caroline Savage; Mika P Matikainen; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Farhang Rabbani; Oguz Akin; Jaspreet S Sandhu Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Raymond C Rosen; Walter Artibani; Peter R Carroll; Anthony Costello; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul R Patel; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Henk Van der Poel; Timothy G Wilson; Filiberto Zattoni; Alexandre Mottrie Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Sean F Mungovan; Jaspreet S Sandhu; Oguz Akin; Neil A Smart; Petra L Graham; Manish I Patel Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: G Hatiboglu; D Teber; D Tichy; S Pahernik; B Hadaschik; J Nyarangi-Dix; M Hohenfellner Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Gudrun Wagenpfeil; Tobias Maurer; Thomas Horn; Kathleen Herkommer; Marie Hegemann; Jürgen E Gschwend; Hubert Kübler Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: M E O'Callaghan; E Raymond; J Campbell; A D Vincent; K Beckmann; D Roder; S Evans; J McNeil; J Millar; J Zalcberg; M Borg; K Moretti Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Ibrahim Karabulut; Fatih Kursat Yilmazel; Ali Haydar Yilmaz; Erkan Cem Celik; Onur Ceylan; Fatih Ozkaya; Senol Adanur; Ozkan Polat Journal: Eurasian J Med Date: 2020-02
Authors: Eelco R P Collette; Sjoerd O Klaver; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Dies van den Ouden; Reindert J A van Moorselaar; André N Vis Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2020-09-15