Literature DB >> 28747618

Comprehensive approach for post-prostatectomy incontinence in the era of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Nobuhiro Haga1, Ruriko Takinami1, Ryo Tanji1, Akifumi Onagi1, Kanako Matsuoka1, Tomoyuki Koguchi1, Hidenori Akaihata1, Junya Hata1, Soichiro Ogawa1, Masao Kataoka1, Yuichi Sato1, Kei Ishibashi1, Ken Aikawa1, Yoshiyuki Kojima1.   

Abstract

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has enabled steady and stable surgical procedures due to both meticulous maneuvers and magnified, clear, 3-dimensional vision. Therefore, better surgical outcomes have been expected with RARP than with other surgical modalities. However, even in the RARP era, post-prostatectomy incontinence has a relatively high incidence as a bothersome complication. To overcome post-prostatectomy incontinence, it goes without saying that meticulous surgical procedures and creative surgical procedures, i.e., "Preservation", "Reconstruction", and "Reinforcement" of the anatomical structures of the pelvis, are most important. In addition, medication and appropriate pad usage might sometimes be helpful for patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence. However, patients who have 1) BMI > 26 kg/m2, 2) prostate volume > 70 mL, 3) eGFR < 60 mL/min, or a 4) Charlson comorbidity index > 2 have a tendency to develop post-prostatectomy incontinence despite undergoing the same surgical procedures. It is important for patients who have a high risk for post-prostatectomy incontinence to be given information about delayed recovery of post-prostatectomy incontinence. Thus, not only the surgical procedures, but also a comprehensive approach, as mentioned above, are important for post-prostatectomy incontinence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lower urinary tract; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; robot; urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28747618      PMCID: PMC5597523          DOI: 10.5387/fms.2017-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci        ISSN: 0016-2590


  65 in total

Review 1.  Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Bernardo Rocco; Gabriele Cozzi; Matteo G Spinelli; Rafael F Coelho; Vipul R Patel; Ashutosh Tewari; Peter Wiklund; Markus Graefen; Alex Mottrie; Franco Gaboardi; Inderbir S Gill; Francesco Montorsi; Walter Artibani; Francesco Rocco
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index is a significant prognostic factor for long-term survival of patients with high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a Bayesian model averaging approach.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Ho Won Kang; Koon Ho Rha; Nam Hoon Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: urodynamic evaluation of vesicourethral function.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Matsukawa; Ryohei Hattori; Yoko Yoshikawa; Yoshinari Ono; Momokazu Gotoh
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.369

4.  Development and validation of nomograms to predict the recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: comparisons between immediate, early, and late continence.

Authors:  Seong Jin Jeong; Jae Seung Yeon; Jeong Keun Lee; Woo Heon Cha; Jin Woo Jeong; Byung Ki Lee; Sang Cheol Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Jeong Hyun Kim; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Bing Li; Chantal M Couris; Kiyohide Fushimi; Patrick Graham; Phil Hider; Jean-Marie Januel; Vijaya Sundararajan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Bladder neck plication stitch: a novel technique during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve recovery of urinary continence.

Authors:  David I Lee; Alexei Wedmid; Pierre Mendoza; Saurabh Sharma; Mary Walicki; Rachel Hastings; Kelly Monahan; Daniel Eun
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  A statistical comparison of pad numbers versus pad weights in the quantification of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Drew A Dylewski; Margaret G Jamison; Kristy M Borawski; Neil D Sherman; Cindy L Amundsen; George D Webster
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 8.  Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Coral A Anderson; Muhammad Imran Omar; Susan E Campbell; Kathleen F Hunter; June D Cody; Cathryn M A Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-20

9.  Treatment of postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence using a minimally invasive adjustable continence balloon device, ProACT: results of a preliminary, multicenter, pilot study.

Authors:  Thierry Lebret; Florence Cour; Jacques Benchetrit; Philippe Grise; Jacques Bernstein; Veronique Delaporte; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Henry Botto; Pierre Costa
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  How to optimize patient selection for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional outcome analyses from a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Giorgio Gandaglia; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Gallina; Emanuele Zaffuto; Vito Cucchiara; Damiano Vizziello; Shahrokh Shariat; Francesco Cantiello; Rocco Damiano; Giorgio Guazzoni; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cognitive Ability as a Non-modifiable Risk Factor for Post-prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence: A Double-Blinded, Prospective, Single-Center Trial.

Authors:  Mathias Reichert; Ionel Valentin Popeneciu; Annemarie Uhlig; Lutz Trojan; Mirjam Naomi Mohr
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.