Literature DB >> 16998858

Preoperative erectile function is one predictor for post prostatectomy incontinence.

S Wille1, A Heidenreich, R Hofmann, U Engelmann.   

Abstract

AIMS: The precise etiology of post prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) is not fully understood and risk factors are not yet comprehensively defined. It has been reported that sparing of the neurovascular bundle during prostatectomy improves postoperative erectile function, whereas the influence on urinary control is unclear. From daily clinical experience we made the impression that patients who are in the best shape have better erections and better continence. We therefore searched our database for a possible correlation between the preoperative erectile function and the incidence of PPI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred three patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy between January 2000 and May 2003 were enrolled into this retrospective study. Data of 327 patients (response rate 81%) at a median follow-up of 26 months were analyzed using the validated International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF 5), the validated Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI6) and a standardized urinary symptom inventory. Continence was defined as usage of no or one pad daily. Erectile Dysfunction (ED) was defined as none/mild or moderate/severe with an IIEF 5 score of 17 or more or less than 17, respectively.
RESULTS: Univariate and mulitvariate logistic regression analysis including preoperative IIEF 5 scores, age and nerve sparing prostatectomy, identified preoperative erectile function as significant predictor for PPI (P = 0.024), whereas age (P = 0.759) and nerve sparing prostatectomy (P = 0.504) did not predict PPI.
CONCLUSION: Erectile function is a predictor of PPI and should be recorded preoperatively. Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16998858     DOI: 10.1002/nau.20314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  9 in total

1.  Development and validation of nomograms to predict the recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: comparisons between immediate, early, and late continence.

Authors:  Seong Jin Jeong; Jae Seung Yeon; Jeong Keun Lee; Woo Heon Cha; Jin Woo Jeong; Byung Ki Lee; Sang Cheol Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Jeong Hyun Kim; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Short-, Intermediate-, and Long-term Quality of Life Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Vinay Prabhu; Ted Lee; Tyler R McClintock; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

3.  Do we need the nerve sparing radical prostatectomy techniques (intrafascial vs. interfascial) in men with erectile dysfunction? Results of a single-centre study.

Authors:  Wael Y Khoder; Raphaela Waidelich; Michael Seitz; Armin J Becker; Alexander Buchner; Stefan Trittschler; Christian G Stief
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  [Etiology and pathophysiology of male stress incontinence].

Authors:  C van der Horst; C M Naumann; A Al-Najaar; C Seif; S H Stübinger; K P Jünemann; P M Braun
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Localized prostate cancer in Norway, the United States, and Spain: between-country differences of variables before treatment among patients eligible for curative treatment.

Authors:  Anne Holck Storås; Martin G Sanda; Montse Ferrer; Jon Håvard Loge; Alv A Dahl; Eivind A S Steinsvik; Ferran Guedea; Milada Cvancarova; Sophie D Fosså
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Early recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of preoperative erectile function and nerve-sparing procedure as predictors.

Authors:  Atsushi Takenaka; Hideo Soga; Toshifumi Kurahashi; Hideaki Miyake; Kazushi Tanaka; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  Dual implantation of penile and sphincter implants in the post-prostatectomy patient.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; Ajay Nehra
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Dual implantation of artificial urinary sphincter and inflatable penile prostheses for concurrent male urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Tariq F Al-Shaiji
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-11-17

9.  Pelvic and hypogastric nerves are injured in a rat prostatectomy model, contributing to development of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Marah Hehemann; Shawn Choe; Elizabeth Kalmanek; Daniel Harrington; Samuel I Stupp; Kevin T McVary; Carol A Podlasek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.