Literature DB >> 23832110

Genomic imprinting is variably lost during reprogramming of mouse iPS cells.

Sachiko Takikawa1, Chelsea Ray1, Xin Wang1, Yulia Shamis1, Tien-Yuan Wu1, Xiajun Li1.   

Abstract

Derivation of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells is mainly an epigenetic reprogramming process. It is still quite controversial how genomic imprinting is reprogrammed in iPS cells. Thus, we derived multiple iPS clones from genetically identical mouse somatic cells. We found that parentally inherited imprint was variably lost among these iPS clones. Concurrent with the loss of DNA methylation imprint at the corresponding Snrpn and Peg3 imprinted regions, parental origin-specific expression of the Snrpn and Zim1 imprinted genes was also lost in these iPS clones. This loss of parental genomic imprinting in iPS cells was likely caused by the reprogramming process during iPS cell derivation because extended culture of iPS cells did not lead to significant increase in the loss of genomic imprinting. Intriguingly, one to several paternal chromosomes appeared to have acquired de novo methylation at the Snrpn and Zac1 imprinted regions in a high percentage of iPS clones. These results might have some implications for future therapeutic applications of iPS cells. Since DNA methylation imprint can be completely erased in some iPS clones at multiple imprinted regions, iPS cell reprogramming may also be employed to dissect the underlying mechanisms of erasure, reacquisition and maintenance of genomic imprinting in mammals.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23832110      PMCID: PMC3815550          DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2013.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Res        ISSN: 1873-5061            Impact factor:   2.020


  42 in total

1.  Epigenetic analysis of the Dlk1-Gtl2 imprinted domain on mouse chromosome 12: implications for imprinting control from comparison with Igf2-H19.

Authors:  Shuji Takada; Martina Paulsen; Maxine Tevendale; Chen-En Tsai; Gavin Kelsey; Bruce M Cattanach; Anne C Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  Imprinting: focusing on the center.

Authors:  I Ben-Porath; H Cedar
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Asymmetric regulation of imprinting on the maternal and paternal chromosomes at the Dlk1-Gtl2 imprinted cluster on mouse chromosome 12.

Authors:  Shau-Ping Lin; Neil Youngson; Shuji Takada; Hervé Seitz; Wolf Reik; Martina Paulsen; Jerome Cavaille; Anne C Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08-24       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Epigenetic instability in ES cells and cloned mice.

Authors:  D Humpherys; K Eggan; H Akutsu; K Hochedlinger; W M Rideout ; D Biniszkiewicz; R Yanagimachi; R Jaenisch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Elite and stochastic models for induced pluripotent stem cell generation.

Authors:  Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Genomic imprinting: employing and avoiding epigenetic processes.

Authors:  Marisa S Bartolomei
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Single-gene transgenic mouse strains for reprogramming adult somatic cells.

Authors:  Bryce W Carey; Styliani Markoulaki; Caroline Beard; Jacob Hanna; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Clone- and gene-specific aberrations of parental imprinting in human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Marjorie Pick; Yonatan Stelzer; Ori Bar-Nur; Yoav Mayshar; Amir Eden; Nissim Benvenisty
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.277

9.  Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Keisuke Okita; Tomoko Ichisaka; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A maternal-zygotic effect gene, Zfp57, maintains both maternal and paternal imprints.

Authors:  Xiajun Li; Mitsuteru Ito; Fen Zhou; Neil Youngson; Xiaopan Zuo; Philip Leder; Anne C Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 12.270

View more
  14 in total

1.  Differential regulation of genomic imprinting by TET proteins in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Lizhi Liu; Shi-Qing Mao; Chelsea Ray; Yu Zhang; Fong T Bell; Sheau-Fang Ng; Guo-Liang Xu; Xiajun Li
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.020

2.  Promising Developments in the Use of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Research of ADHD.

Authors:  Cristine Marie Yde Ohki; Rhiannon V McNeill; Matthias Nieberler; Franziska Radtke; Sarah Kittel-Schneider; Edna Grünblatt
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022

Review 3.  DLK1-DIO3 imprinted cluster in induced pluripotency: landscape in the mist.

Authors:  Leonidas Benetatos; George Vartholomatos; Eleftheria Hatzimichael
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Derivation and investigation of the first human cell-based model of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.

Authors:  Suhee Chang; Stella K Hur; Natali S Sobel Naveh; Joanne L Thorvaldsen; Deborah L French; Alyssa L Gagne; Chintan D Jobaliya; Montserrat C Anguera; Marisa S Bartolomei; Jennifer M Kalish
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 5.  Epigenetic mechanisms of induced pluripotency.

Authors:  Marta Gładych; Anastazja Andrzejewska; Urszula Oleksiewicz; Marcos R H Estécio
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2015

6.  X Chromosome Dosage Influences DNA Methylation Dynamics during Reprogramming to Mouse iPSCs.

Authors:  Vincent Pasque; Rahul Karnik; Constantinos Chronis; Paula Petrella; Justin Langerman; Giancarlo Bonora; Juan Song; Lotte Vanheer; Anupama Sadhu Dimashkie; Alexander Meissner; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 7.765

Review 7.  Concise Review: Molecular Cytogenetics and Quality Control: Clinical Guardians for Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Leili Rohani; Adiv A Johnson; Pooyan Naghsh; Derrick E Rancourt; Henning Ulrich; Heidrun Holland
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 6.940

8.  Dynamic reversal of random X-Chromosome inactivation during iPSC reprogramming.

Authors:  Adrian Janiszewski; Irene Talon; Joel Chappell; Samuel Collombet; Juan Song; Natalie De Geest; San Kit To; Greet Bervoets; Oskar Marin-Bejar; Caterina Provenzano; Lotte Vanheer; Jean-Christophe Marine; Florian Rambow; Vincent Pasque
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Excluding Oct4 from Yamanaka Cocktail Unleashes the Developmental Potential of iPSCs.

Authors:  Sergiy Velychko; Kenjiro Adachi; Kee-Pyo Kim; Yanlin Hou; Caitlin M MacCarthy; Guangming Wu; Hans R Schöler
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 24.633

10.  Methylation and transcripts expression at the imprinted GNAS locus in human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells and their derivatives.

Authors:  Virginie Grybek; Laetitia Aubry; Stéphanie Maupetit-Méhouas; Catherine Le Stunff; Cécile Denis; Mathilde Girard; Agnès Linglart; Caroline Silve
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 7.765

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.