Literature DB >> 23828094

Effects of interpupillary distance on stereoacuity: the Frisby Davis distance stereotest versus a 3-dimensional distance stereotest.

Youngsub Eom1, Jong-Suk Song, Soh-Eun Ahn, Su-Yeon Kang, Young-Woo Suh, Jaeryung Oh, Seung-Hyun Kim, Hyo Myung Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of interpupillary distance (IPD) on stereoacuity using 2 kinds of stereoacuity tests in a normal population.
METHODS: The distance stereoacuities of 33 healthy volunteers with no evidence of ocular diseases were measured with the Frisby Davis distance (FD2) stereotest and a 3-dimensional monitor-based distance stereotest (distance 3-D stereotest). These 2 kinds of stereotests were repeated using horizontal periscopes to increase the IPD 2- and 3-fold in order to investigate the effect of IPD increase on stereoacuity.
RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 28.5 years (range 20-41 years). The mean logarithms of the individual minimum angle of stereodiscrimination (logMAS) were 1.04 ± 0.23 (range 0.70-1.48 logMAS) with the FD2 stereotest and 1.52 ± 0.19 (range 1.00-1.85 logMAS) with the distance 3-D stereotest. As the IPD increased 2- and 3-fold, the logMAS measured with the FD2 stereotest improved from 1.04 to 0.98 and 0.91 (P = 0.061 and P = 0.003), respectively, and those measured with the distance 3-D stereotest worsened from 1.52 to 1.73 and 1.85 (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in IPD measured with the FD2 stereotest exhibited opposite effects to those measured with the distance 3-D stereotest. This reflects what is known to happen in the real world, i.e., that stereoacuity improves as IPD increases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23828094     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-013-0253-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  14 in total

1.  Normal values and standard deviations for pupil diameter and interpupillary distance in subjects aged 1 month to 19 years.

Authors:  Colleen MacLachlan; Howard C Howland
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  A new 3D monitor-based random-dot stereotest for children.

Authors:  Armin Breyer; Xiaoyi Jiang; Adrian Rütsche; Daniel S Mojon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Stereoacuity is affected by induced phoria but returns toward baseline during vergence adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah Spencer; Alison Y Firth
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Development of distant stereoacuity in visually normal children as measured by the Frisby-Davis distance stereotest.

Authors:  S W Hong; S C Park
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Distance stereotest using a 3-dimensional monitor for adult subjects.

Authors:  Jongshin Kim; Hee Kyung Yang; Youngmin Kim; Byoungho Lee; Jeong-Min Hwang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; Sherry L Fawcett
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Distance stereoacuity norms for the mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester in young children and young adults.

Authors:  C Yildirim; H I Altinsoy; E Yakut
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.220

8.  Effects of aniseikonia, anisometropia, accommodation, retinal illuminance, and pupil size on stereopsis.

Authors:  J V Lovasik; M Szymkiw
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Frisby Davis distance stereoacuity values in visually normal children.

Authors:  W E Adams; S Hrisos; S Richardson; H Davis; J P Frisby; M P Clarke
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Distance stereoacuity. Assessing control in intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  R A Stathacopoulos; A L Rosenbaum; D Zanoni; D R Stager; L C McCall; A J Ziffer; M Everett
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  4 in total

1.  Characterizing the Randot Preschool stereotest: Testability, norms, reliability, specificity and sensitivity in children aged 2-11 years.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Sheima Rafiq; Jess Hugill; Therese Casanova; Carla Black; Adam O'Neill; Vicente Puyat; Helen Haggerty; Kathryn Smart; Christine Powell; Kate Taylor; Michael P Clarke; Kathleen Vancleef
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Nasopupillary asymmetry.

Authors:  Eduardo Arenas; Diana Muñoz; Evelyn Matheus; Diana Morales
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-12-04

3.  Evaluating stereoacuity with 3D shutter glasses technology.

Authors:  Huang Wu; Han Jin; Ying Sun; Yang Wang; Min Ge; Yang Chen; Yunfeng Chi
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Fundamentals of Presbyopia: visual processing and binocularity in its transformation.

Authors:  Olga I Rozanova; Andrey G Shchuko; Tatyana S Mischenko
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2018-01-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.