Literature DB >> 15652852

Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test.

Jonathan M Holmes1, Sherry L Fawcett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a presentation protocol for the new Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) distance stereoacuity test.
DESIGN: Prospective data collection.
METHODS: Stereoacuity was tested monocularly and binocularly in 95 patients with a variety of strabismic and nonstrabismic conditions, using the FD2, employing a modified staircase procedure. The Preschool Randot Stereoacuity test and the near Frisby test were used to determine whether a patient was stereoblind.
RESULTS: Under monocular conditions, 35 (37%) of 95 patients passed at least the largest disparity of the FD2 indicating a problem with monocular cues. The binocular protocol was then modified to include a monocular test phase. Using the new protocol, if a patient could achieve the same stereoacuity under monocular and binocular conditions, they were deemed to have no stereopsis. Testing 28 additional stereoblind patients using the new modified protocol revealed no false positives.
CONCLUSION: The FD2 stereotest is a useful measure of distance stereoacuity, provided the presentation protocol accounts for monocular cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15652852     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  24 in total

1.  Improvement in distance stereoacuity following surgery for intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Wendy E Adams; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Brian G Mohney; Eileen E Birch; David R Weakley; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  Stereoacuity and binocular visual acuity in prism-induced exodeviation.

Authors:  Philip W Laird; Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Effects of interpupillary distance on stereoacuity: the Frisby Davis distance stereotest versus a 3-dimensional distance stereotest.

Authors:  Youngsub Eom; Jong-Suk Song; Soh-Eun Ahn; Su-Yeon Kang; Young-Woo Suh; Jaeryung Oh; Seung-Hyun Kim; Hyo Myung Kim
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Distance stereoacuity in prism-induced convergence stress.

Authors:  Philip W Laird; Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 1.220

Review 5.  Stereo vision and strabismus.

Authors:  J C A Read
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Real depth vs randot stereotests.

Authors:  David A Leske; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  The effect of induced monocular blur on measures of stereoacuity.

Authors:  Naomi V Odell; Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Wendy E Adams; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 1.220

8.  Variability of stereoacuity in intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; Brian G Mohney; David A Leske; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Contribution of a real depth distance stereoacuity test to clinical management.

Authors:  B J Young; H Sueke; J M Wylie; S B Kaye
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Defining real change in measures of stereoacuity.

Authors:  Wendy E Adams; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.