Literature DB >> 16234448

Frisby Davis distance stereoacuity values in visually normal children.

W E Adams1, S Hrisos, S Richardson, H Davis, J P Frisby, M P Clarke.   

Abstract

AIMS: To establish the range of normal distance stereoacuity in young children using the Frisby Davis distance stereo test (FD2).
METHODS: Children passing preschool vision screening assessments underwent measurement of distance stereoacuity with the FD2 using a standard testing protocol.
RESULTS: 59 visually normal children aged between 36 months and 68 months were recruited to this study. All 59 were able to understand the test requirements and were examined with the FD2 stereo test. Four (6.8%) had no measurable stereoacuity; 13 (24%) had stereoacuity measurable only at a 3 metre testing distance (mean 92.3 seconds of arc; SD 52.6). These children were significantly younger than the remaining 42 (76%) who demonstrated a stereoacuity response at a 6 metre testing distance (mean 29.6 seconds of arc; SD 13.1, p=0.008).
CONCLUSION: The FD2 stereo test enables the measurement of distance stereoacuity in young children. There appears to be a maturational effect with distance stereoacuity improving between 36 months and 68 months. The data on age related normal values will provide a baseline from which to compare outcomes in clinical populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16234448      PMCID: PMC1772919          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.071761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  13 in total

1.  Distance stereopsis as a screening device.

Authors:  R P Rutstein; D A Corliss
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Th monofixation syndrome.

Authors:  M M Parks
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1969

3.  Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; Sherry L Fawcett
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Distance stereoacuity norms for the mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester in young children and young adults.

Authors:  C Yildirim; H I Altinsoy; E Yakut
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Stereoscopic threshold in children and adults.

Authors:  G Heron; S Dholakia; D E Collins; H McLaughlan
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1985-08

6.  Stereoacuity norms in young children.

Authors:  K Simons
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-03

7.  BVAT distance vs. near stereopsis screening of strabismus, strabismic amblyopia and refractive amblyopia; a prospective study of 68 patients.

Authors:  R P Rutstein; D A Corliss
Journal:  Binocul Vis Strabismus Q       Date:  2000

8.  TNO stereopsis test as an aid to the prevention of amblyopia.

Authors:  J Walraven; P Janzen
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Distance stereoacuity. Assessing control in intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  R A Stathacopoulos; A L Rosenbaum; D Zanoni; D R Stager; L C McCall; A J Ziffer; M Everett
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  A new method for evaluating distance stereo acuity.

Authors:  D Zanoni; A L Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  15 in total

1.  Improvement in distance stereoacuity following surgery for intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Wendy E Adams; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Brian G Mohney; Eileen E Birch; David R Weakley; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  Effects of interpupillary distance on stereoacuity: the Frisby Davis distance stereotest versus a 3-dimensional distance stereotest.

Authors:  Youngsub Eom; Jong-Suk Song; Soh-Eun Ahn; Su-Yeon Kang; Young-Woo Suh; Jaeryung Oh; Seung-Hyun Kim; Hyo Myung Kim
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Stereo vision and strabismus.

Authors:  J C A Read
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Real depth vs randot stereotests.

Authors:  David A Leske; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  New tests of distance stereoacuity and their role in evaluating intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; Eileen E Birch; David A Leske; Valeria L Fu; Brian G Mohney
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Distance stereoacuity in intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  S R Hatt; H Haggerty; D Buck; W Adams; N P Strong; M P Clarke
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Variability of stereoacuity in intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; Brian G Mohney; David A Leske; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Defining real change in measures of stereoacuity.

Authors:  Wendy E Adams; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Influence of stereopsis and abnormal binocular vision on ocular and systemic discomfort while watching 3D television.

Authors:  S-H Kim; Y-W Suh; C Yun; E-J Yoo; J-H Yeom; Y A Cho
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 10.  Tests for detecting strabismus in children aged 1 to 6 years in the community.

Authors:  Sarah Hull; Vijay Tailor; Sara Balduzzi; Jugnoo Rahi; Christine Schmucker; Gianni Virgili; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.