Literature DB >> 10532363

Distance stereoacuity norms for the mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester in young children and young adults.

C Yildirim1, H I Altinsoy, E Yakut.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to provide normative distance stereoacuity data for the Mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester (Mentor O & O, Norwell, Mass.).
METHODS: Near and distance stereoacuity for 45 normal young children (5 to 6 years old, child group) and 67 normal young adults (16 to 20 years old, adult group) were evaluated. Distance stereoacuity was measured with the Random Dot and the Circles tests on the B-VAT unit. Near stereopsis was assessed by Titmus, Randot, and TNO tests. Additionally, a random subset of the subjects was retested 1 month later with the B-VAT unit.
RESULTS: The mean and SD values of stereoacuity measured on the Circles and Random Dot tests were 49 +/- 33 and 98 +/- 49 seconds of arc in children (p < 0.0001) and 50 +/- 32 and 83 +/- 51 seconds of arc in adults (p < 0.0001), respectively. No significant differences were found between the same tests with respect to age. Of 112 subjects in both groups, 110 (98%) achieved 120 seconds of arc or finer stereoacuity threshold levels on the Circles test and 108 (96%) demonstrated 180 seconds of arc or finer scores on the Random Dot test. Although all but two of the subjects exhibited stereopsis both at near and at distance, there were low correlations among the different near and distance stereotests. Test and retest distance stereoacuity scores agreed closely.
CONCLUSIONS: The B-VAT II-SG system produces reliable distance stereoacuity data. The norms we obtained may aid the clinician to detect binocular visual disturbances or may provide a basis for using distance stereoacuity as a screening method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10532363     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-8531(98)90106-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  10 in total

1.  Effects of interpupillary distance on stereoacuity: the Frisby Davis distance stereotest versus a 3-dimensional distance stereotest.

Authors:  Youngsub Eom; Jong-Suk Song; Soh-Eun Ahn; Su-Yeon Kang; Young-Woo Suh; Jaeryung Oh; Seung-Hyun Kim; Hyo Myung Kim
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Stability of near stereoacuity in childhood intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Michael C Brodsky; Brian G Mohney
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Frisby Davis distance stereoacuity values in visually normal children.

Authors:  W E Adams; S Hrisos; S Richardson; H Davis; J P Frisby; M P Clarke
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  The difference in stereoacuity testing: contour-based and random dot-based graphs at far and near distances.

Authors:  Lingzhi Zhao; Huang Wu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-05

5.  Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity.

Authors:  Yo Iwata; Fusako Fujimura; Tomoya Handa; Nobuyuki Shoji; Hitoshi Ishikawa
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Vision and Visual History in Elite/Near-Elite-Level Cricketers and Rugby-League Players.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Jonathan C Flavell; Simon J Bennett; Alice G Cruickshank; Alex Mankowska; Julie M Harris; John G Buckley
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2017-11-10

7.  Comparison of sensory outcomes in patients with successful motor outcome versus recurrent exotropia after surgery for intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Hye Jun Joo; Jin Ju Choi; Jin Woo Ro; Dong Gyu Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Test: normative data and validity.

Authors:  Eileen Birch; Cathy Williams; James Drover; Valeria Fu; Christina Cheng; Kate Northstone; Mary Courage; Russell Adams
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 1.220

9.  Distance stereotesting using vision test charts for intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Noriko Nishikawa; Satoshi Ishiko; Ikuko Yamaga; Miho Sato; Akitoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-25

10.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes with Unilateral Recession and Resection According to Angle of Deviation in Basic Intermittent Exotropia.

Authors:  Soon Young Cho; Se Youp Lee; Jong Hyun Jung
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.