Literature DB >> 23827292

Challenging boundaries: an enhanced recovery programme for radical cystectomy.

S Mukhtar1, B E Ayres, R Issa, M J Swinn, M J A Perry.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The implementation of enhanced recovery programmes (ERPs) in colorectal surgery has seen improvements in the length of inpatient stay with no increase in complications. We investigated the role of ERP in radical cystectomy at our institution.
METHODS: Prospective data were collected from 26 consecutive patients prior to the introduction of the ERP and 51 patients who underwent open radical cystectomy within an ERP. Individuals in the ERP cohort did not receive bowel preparation or nasogastric drainage but received preoperative carbohydrate drinks, perioperative epidural analgesia and immediate mobilisation on day 1. Primary outcome measures included duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcome measures included the time to the passage of flatus and faeces, and time to mobilisation. Other measures that were analysed included operation time and complications.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics for both groups were similar. The median length of hospital stay fell from 11.5 days to 10.4 days and the mean ICU stay dropped from 2.4 days to 1.0 days (p=0.01). Time to removal of nasogastric tube, and time to passage of flatus and faeces were significantly shorter in the ERP group, as was the time to full oral diet. Clavien complication rates and 30-day mortality rates were similar in both groups. There were no readmissions.
CONCLUSIONS: ERP in radical cystectomy is safe and not associated with any increase in complications or readmissions. It is associated with reductions in ICU stay, and could also reduce length of hospital stay and duration of postoperative ileus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23827292      PMCID: PMC4165245          DOI: 10.1308/003588413X13511609957579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  18 in total

1.  The effect of pharmacological modification of gastric emptying and mouth-to-caecum transit time on the absorption of sugar probe marker molecules of intestinal permeability in normal man.

Authors:  A L Brunetto; A D Pearson; R Gibson; D N Bateman; M U Rashid; M F Laker
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.686

Review 2.  Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection.

Authors:  K C H Fearon; O Ljungqvist; M Von Meyenfeldt; A Revhaug; C H C Dejong; K Lassen; J Nygren; J Hausel; M Soop; J Andersen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 7.324

3.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  P M King; J M Blazeby; P Ewings; P J Franks; R J Longman; A H Kendrick; R M Kipling; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast-track colonic surgery.

Authors:  J Andersen; D Hjort-Jakobsen; P S Christiansen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

Authors:  J Maessen; C H C Dejong; J Hausel; J Nygren; K Lassen; J Andersen; A G H Kessels; A Revhaug; H Kehlet; O Ljungqvist; K C H Fearon; M F von Meyenfeldt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation.

Authors:  H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 7.  Acute pain control and accelerated postoperative surgical recovery.

Authors:  H Kehlet
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  A cohort study of results following elective colonic and rectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  O Faiz; T Brown; G Colucci; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Introduction of an enhanced recovery protocol for radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Nimalan Arumainayagam; John McGrath; Kieran P Jefferson; David A Gillatt
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy.

Authors:  M L Cheatham; W C Chapman; S P Key; J L Sawyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced recovery programmes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Julian Smith; Raj S Pruthi; John McGrath
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  A meta-analysis of fast track surgery for patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy.

Authors:  S Chen; Z Zou; F Chen; Z Huang; G Li
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Evaluation of an enhanced recovery protocol on patients having radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Bonnie Liu; Trustin Domes; Kunal Jana
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  A prospective randomized pilot study evaluating an ERAS protocol versus a standard protocol for patients treated with radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Sebastian Karl Frees; Jonathan Aning; Peter Black; Werner Struss; Robert Bell; Claudia Chavez-Munoz; Martin Gleave; Alan I So
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Enhanced Recovery after Urological Surgery: A Contemporary Systematic Review of Outcomes, Key Elements, and Research Needs.

Authors:  Raed A Azhar; Bernard Bochner; James Catto; Alvin C Goh; John Kelly; Hiten D Patel; Raj S Pruthi; George N Thalmann; Mihir Desai
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Enhanced Recovery Pathways Versus Standard Care After Cystectomy: A Meta-analysis of the Effect on Perioperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Mark D Tyson; Sam S Chang
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Major Urologic Surgery.

Authors:  Natalija Vukovic; Ljubomir Dinic
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-04-09

8.  Early recovery after surgery for radical cystectomy: comprehensive assessment and meta-analysis of existing protocols.

Authors:  F Wessels; M Lenhart; K F Kowalewski; V Braun; T Terboven; F Roghmann; M S Michel; P Honeck; M C Kriegmair
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Chunxiao Wei; Fengchun Wan; Haiwei Zhao; Jiajia Ma; Zhenli Gao; Chunhua Lin
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 10.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Muaz Peerbocus; Zeng-Jun Wang
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-07-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.