| Literature DB >> 23826735 |
Yizhen Wan1, Heidi R Schwaninger, Angela M Baldo, Joanne A Labate, Gan-Yuan Zhong, Charles J Simon.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Grapes are one of the most economically important fruit crops. There are about 60 species in the genus Vitis. The phylogenetic relationships among these species are of keen interest for the conservation and use of this germplasm. We selected 309 accessions from 48 Vitis species,varieties, and outgroups, examined ~11 kb (~3.4 Mb total) of aligned nuclear DNA sequences from 27 unlinked genes in a phylogenetic context, and estimated divergence times based on fossil calibrations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23826735 PMCID: PMC3750556 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Native geographic distribution of the genus (grey shading) and geographic regions of origin of species used in this study. Dashed lines indicate southern borders of the polar ice cap during the most recent ice age2. Dash-dot lines indicate ice age refugia of the forest flora2. Areas labeled 1 through 4 were used in ancestral area optimization (reversible parsimony, Additional file 14). Redrawn from 1Alleweldt et al. [7], 2Reinig [14].
Figure 2The NeighborNet of 273 accessions based on 27 concatenated nuclear gene fragments. Numbers indicate the series to which species have been recognized 1: Aestivales (Planchon); 2: Cinerascentes (Planchon); 3: Cordifoliae (Munson); 4: Labruscae (Planchon); 5: Ripariae (Munson); 6: Occidentales (Munson); 7: Viniferae (Planchon); 8: Flexuosae (Galet); 9: Spinosae (Galet). See also Additional file 15.
Figure 3Chronogram of Bayesian divergence time estimates of diversification based on 27 concatenated nuclear gene fragments inferred using the BEAST software. Grey bars represent the 95% Highest Posterior Density (HPD) intervals of nodal age in million years. Calibration points are indicated with filled circles. Significant evolutionary events are indicated with black diamonds. Asterisk indicates inclusion of a clonally propagated cultivar that may affect the local divergence estimate. Additional files 4 and 5 show nodal ages and posterior probabilities for all nodes in this tree.
Figure 4Hypothesis of phylogenetic relationships among species. North America. Strict consensus of 282 most parsimonious trees from four driven searches with support values for selected nodes. Above branches: (Maximum Likelihood BS/ Bayesian PP/ Maximum Parsimony BS). Values can range from 1-100 in ML, 0-1 in BA, 50-100 in MP. Below branches: (node number: branch length/No unique characters/No genes in support of node). The annotation “319: 8/2/6” means that node number 319 has 8 character changes of which 2 are unique to that node, and 6 genes contributed changes. “na” indicates absence of a value in the specific support category. Branch lengths, bootstrap supports, and posterior probabilities for all available branches are shown in Additional files 7, 8, 13, 16. Nodes labeled A-Y are discussed in the text. Figure 4 continues in Figure 5.
Figure 5Hypothesis of phylogenetic relationships among species. Eurasia.Continuation of Figure 4.
Figure 6Simplified version (cartoon) of the MP strict consensus tree. Blue = North and Central American accessions, Green = Asian accessions, Red = European accessions. For comparison, Additional files 6 and 10 represent cartoons of the ML and BA trees, respectively.
Comparison of divergence estimates in among five studies that analyzed SNP data and used zero, two or three fossil calibration points
| | | | | | |
| Estimate (Ma) | _8 | ~8 | 18.60, 19.055 | ~12 | 28.32 |
| 95% HPD (Ma) | _ | ~16-4 | 28.79-9.50, 29.07-10.2 | ~22-6 | 41.25-16.23 |
| subg. | | | | | |
| Estimate (Ma) | _ | ~5.5 | 6.31, 6.55 | ~7 | 17.82 |
| 95% HPD (Ma) | _ | ~10-2.5 | 9.50-3.50, 9.34-4.50 | ~11-5 | 26.71-10.14 |
| Europe/Near East - Asia | | | | | |
| Estimate (Ma) | _ | _ | 4.31, 4.47 | _ | 6.36 |
| 95% HPD (Ma) | _ | _ | 6.60-2.31, 6.71-2.61 | _ | 9.80-3.36 |
| Eurasia-NC America | | | | | |
| Estimate (Ma) | 4.98 (5.98- < 0.28) | _ | 6.31, 6.55 | _ | 11.12 |
| 95% HPD (Ma) | _ | _ | 9.50-3.50, 9.34-4.50 | _ | 16.58-6.59 |
| Higher level intra North America | | | | | |
| Estimate (Ma) | _ | _ | _ | _ | 15.75-8.96 |
| 95% HPD (Ma) | _ | _ | _ | _ | multiple |
| Higher level intra Asia | | | | | |
| Estimate (Ma) | _ | _ | _ | _ | 9.78-5.28 |
| 95% HPD (Ma) | _ | _ | _ | _ | multiple |
| Species stem | | | | | |
| Estimate (Ma) | _ | _ | _ | _ | 11.68-1.3 |
| 95% HPD (Ma) | _ | _ | _ | _ | multiple |
| Fossil calibrations (Ma), Priors used | | | | | |
| Vitaceae - | _ | 85 ± 4.09 | 85 ± 4.0 | 90.7 ± 1.010 | 90.7 ± 1.0 |
| _ | 58.5 ± 5.011 | _ | 58.5 ± 5.0 | 58.5 ± 5.0 | |
| Old World - New world | _ | _ | 21.6 ± 6.412 | _ | _ |
| Within | _ | _ | 4.5 13 | 5.75 ± 0.514 | 5.75 ± 0.5 |
1For nodes "Higher level intra North America", "Higher level intra Asia, "Species stem" the range contains several clades with different estimates, see Figure 3 and Additional file 4 for details, and the 95% HPD included multiple HDP associated with the several clades, see Figure 3. 2one chloroplast gene, 11 diverse Angiosperms; 34226 nt (2794 cpDNA + 1432 nDNA); 43583 nt (2701 cpDNA + 882 nDNA); 5estimates from analyses that either constrained the stem (first number) or the crown of subgenus Vitis; 65471 nt cpDNA;711,440 nt, 27 nuclear gene fragments; 8dash: information is not applicable; 9Wikström et al. [56] used a 3-gene data set, rate smoothing, and a single calibration point to estimate the stem age of Vitaceae at 78 - 92 Ma from which the prior distribution was derived; 10estimate from Magallón and Castillo [57] because Liu et al. [35] agree with arguments made by Nie et al. [58] that the previous Vitaceae stem age estimate [56] was inaccurate; 11stem age of the Vitis-Ampelocissus clade, located in the Paleocene to which the oldest reliable Vitaceae fossils date, including Ampelopsis, Ampelocissus and Vitis[35]; 12prior based on estimates by Nie et al. [35]; 13minimum age constraint based on fossil seeds described by Gong et al. [59]; 14based on fossil relatives of V. labrusca described by Gong et al. [59].