Literature DB >> 21186249

Genome-scale phylogenetics: inferring the plant tree of life from 18,896 gene trees.

J Gordon Burleigh1, Mukul S Bansal, Oliver Eulenstein, Stefanie Hartmann, André Wehe, Todd J Vision.   

Abstract

Phylogenetic analyses using genome-scale data sets must confront incongruence among gene trees, which in plants is exacerbated by frequent gene duplications and losses. Gene tree parsimony (GTP) is a phylogenetic optimization criterion in which a species tree that minimizes the number of gene duplications induced among a set of gene trees is selected. The run time performance of previous implementations has limited its use on large-scale data sets. We used new software that incorporates recent algorithmic advances to examine the performance of GTP on a plant data set consisting of 18,896 gene trees containing 510,922 protein sequences from 136 plant taxa (giving a combined alignment length of >2.9 million characters). The relationships inferred from the GTP analysis were largely consistent with previous large-scale studies of backbone plant phylogeny and resolved some controversial nodes. The placement of taxa that were present in few gene trees generally varied the most among GTP bootstrap replicates. Excluding these taxa either before or after the GTP analysis revealed high levels of phylogenetic support across plants. The analyses supported magnoliids sister to a eudicot + monocot clade and did not support the eurosid I and II clades. This study presents a nuclear genomic perspective on the broad-scale phylogenic relationships among plants, and it demonstrates that nuclear genes with a history of duplication and loss can be phylogenetically informative for resolving the plant tree of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21186249      PMCID: PMC3038350          DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syq072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  49 in total

1.  Extracting species trees from complex gene trees: reconciled trees and vertebrate phylogeny.

Authors:  R D Page
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  NOTUNG: a program for dating gene duplications and optimizing gene family trees.

Authors:  K Chen; D Durand; M Farach-Colton
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Vertebrate phylogenomics: reconciled trees and gene duplications.

Authors:  R D M Page; J A Cotton
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2002

4.  An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families.

Authors:  A J Enright; S Van Dongen; C A Ouzounis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods.

Authors:  D L Swofford; P J Waddell; J P Huelsenbeck; P G Foster; P O Lewis; J S Rogers
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  How should species phylogenies be inferred from sequence data?

Authors:  J B Slowinski; R D Page
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Going nuclear: gene family evolution and vertebrate phylogeny reconciled.

Authors:  James A Cotton; Roderic D M Page
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  The evolutionary demography of duplicate genes.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; John S Conery
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

9.  Perils of paralogy: using HSP70 genes for inferring organismal phylogenies.

Authors:  Andrew P Martin; Theresa M Burg
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 15.683

10.  QDist--quartet distance between evolutionary trees.

Authors:  Thomas Mailund; Christian N S Pedersen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  A timeline for terrestrialization: consequences for the carbon cycle in the Palaeozoic.

Authors:  Paul Kenrick; Charles H Wellman; Harald Schneider; Gregory D Edgecombe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Turning the crown upside down: gene tree parsimony roots the eukaryotic tree of life.

Authors:  Laura A Katz; Jessica R Grant; Laura Wegener Parfrey; J Gordon Burleigh
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Reconciliation revisited: handling multiple optima when reconciling with duplication, transfer, and loss.

Authors:  Mukul S Bansal; Eric J Alm; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants.

Authors:  Norman J Wickett; Siavash Mirarab; Nam Nguyen; Tandy Warnow; Eric Carpenter; Naim Matasci; Saravanaraj Ayyampalayam; Michael S Barker; J Gordon Burleigh; Matthew A Gitzendanner; Brad R Ruhfel; Eric Wafula; Joshua P Der; Sean W Graham; Sarah Mathews; Michael Melkonian; Douglas E Soltis; Pamela S Soltis; Nicholas W Miles; Carl J Rothfels; Lisa Pokorny; A Jonathan Shaw; Lisa DeGironimo; Dennis W Stevenson; Barbara Surek; Juan Carlos Villarreal; Béatrice Roure; Hervé Philippe; Claude W dePamphilis; Tao Chen; Michael K Deyholos; Regina S Baucom; Toni M Kutchan; Megan M Augustin; Jun Wang; Yong Zhang; Zhijian Tian; Zhixiang Yan; Xiaolei Wu; Xiao Sun; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; James Leebens-Mack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Are the duplication cost and Robinson-Foulds distance equivalent?

Authors:  Yu Zheng; Louxin Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 1.479

6.  Efficient error correction algorithms for gene tree reconciliation based on duplication, duplication and loss, and deep coalescence.

Authors:  Ruchi Chaudhary; J Gordon Burleigh; Oliver Eulenstein
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Efficient genome-scale phylogenetic analysis under the duplication-loss and deep coalescence cost models.

Authors:  Mukul S Bansal; J Gordon Burleigh; Oliver Eulenstein
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Efficient algorithms for the reconciliation problem with gene duplication, horizontal transfer and loss.

Authors:  Mukul S Bansal; Eric J Alm; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 9.  Evolution and diversity of the angiosperm anther: trends in function and development.

Authors:  Johanna Åstrand; Christopher Knight; Jordan Robson; Behzad Talle; Zoe A Wilson
Journal:  Plant Reprod       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.767

10.  TreeFix: statistically informed gene tree error correction using species trees.

Authors:  Yi-Chieh Wu; Matthew D Rasmussen; Mukul S Bansal; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 15.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.