| Literature DB >> 23826151 |
Yu Ting Wu1, Tesfaye Wubet, Stefan Trogisch, Sabine Both, Thomas Scholten, Helge Bruelheide, François Buscot.
Abstract
Fungal diversity and community composition are mainly related to soil and vegetation factors. However, the relative contribution of the different drivers remains largely unexplored, especially in subtropical forest ecosystems. We studied the fungal diversity and community composition of soils sampled from 12 comparative study plots representing three forest age classes (Young: 10-40 yrs; Medium: 40-80 yrs; Old: ≥80 yrs) in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve in South-eastern China. Soil fungal communities were assessed employing ITS rDNA pyrotag sequencing. Members of Basidiomycota and Ascomycota dominated the fungal community, with 22 putative ectomycorrhizal fungal families, where Russulaceae and Thelephoraceae were the most abundant taxa. Analysis of similarity showed that the fungal community composition significantly differed among the three forest age classes. Forest age class, elevation of the study plots, and soil organic carbon (SOC) were the most important factors shaping the fungal community composition. We found a significant correlation between plant and fungal communities at different taxonomic and functional group levels, including a strong relationship between ectomycorrhizal fungal and non-ectomycorrhizal plant communities. Our results suggest that in subtropical forests, plant species community composition is the main driver of the soil fungal diversity and community composition.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23826151 PMCID: PMC3694989 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066829
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Elevation of study sites, plant parameters and soil characteristics of the comparative study plots (CSPs) and their relationships with forest age class based on Pearson correlation analysis.
| Forest age | CSP16 | CSP17 | CSP25 | CSP26 | CSP01 | CSP05 | CSP08 | CSP09 | CSP02 | CSP04 | CSP12 | CSP13 | Pearson R2 |
| Young | Young | Young | Young | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | Old | Old | Old | Old | ||
| Elevation (m) | 309 | 310 | 345 | 251 | 522 | 507 | 413 | 348 | 390 | 542 | 620 | 402 |
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Herb layer cover (%) | 55 | 10 | 60 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 45 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 15 | −0.427 |
| Tree layer cover (%) | 64 | 60 | 33 | 48 | 30 | 25 | 33 | 30 | 23 | 33 | 30 | 25 |
|
| Deadwood cover (%) | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 25 | 15 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 90 | 10 |
|
| Opensoil cover (%) | 1 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0.04 |
| Rock cover (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0.432 |
| Litter layer (thickness, cm) | 2.79 | 2.46 | 2.92 | 2.25 | 3.04 | 2.46 | 4.21 | 3.50 | 3.71 | 3.08 | 2.96 | 2.79 | 0.429 |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Herb species richness | 17 | 12 | 8 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 6 | 12 | −0.271 |
| Tree species richness | 37 | 39 | 27 | 44 | 44 | 25 | 53 | 55 | 69 | 44 | 29 | 32 | 0.173 |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Herbaceous biomass (g) | 26.3 | 5.21 | 64.2 | 5.49 | 9.08 | 0.23 | 25.9 | 38.0 | 9.07 | 5.15 | 0.00 | 0.64 | −0.512 |
| Woody plant biomass (<1 m) (g) | 16.7 | 12.7 | 10.4 | 7.82 | 9.16 | 2.09 | 2.56 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 4.12 | 0.19 | 8.07 |
|
| Litter biomass (dry weight, g per 0.11 m2) | 69.4 | 101.0 | 85.4 | 87.4 | 122.6 | 80.0 | 92.9 | 60.9 | 78.3 | 97.2 | 63.5 | 89.9 | −0.099 |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Sand (%) | 52.7 | 47.3 | 54.2 | 55.6 | 48.1 | 53.8 | 48.1 | 42.2 | 35.3 | 31.4 | 45.9 | 53.0 |
|
| Clay (%) | 20.4 | 23.9 | 18.8 | 19.9 | 20.4 | 18.0 | 20.5 | 22.3 | 24.8 | 23.7 | 16.4 | 19.3 | 0.015 |
| Soil organic carbon (%) | 4.05 | 4.51 | 4.07 | 4.11 | 5.70 | 4.03 | 7.11 | 7.22 | 7.43 | 8.54 | 6.15 | 3.55 | 0.535 |
| C/N ratio | 19.1 | 17.9 | 21.6 | 16.1 | 18.1 | 19.5 | 20.1 | 18.0 | 15.9 | 15.8 | 18.3 | 18.7 | −0.364 |
| pHKCl | 3.82 | 3.84 | 3.73 | 4.01 | 3.75 | 3.87 | 3.78 | 3.61 | 3.75 | 3.72 | 3.95 | 3.94 | −0.038 |
Significant values (Bonferroni corrected P<0.05) are shown in bold.
P<0.05,
P<0.01.
Figure 1Complete hierarchical clusters based on pair-wise dissimilarity matrices derived from (a) abundance based Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix (βbray) and (b) incidence based Sorenson dissimilarity matrix accounting for beta diversity (βsor).
Both cluster diagrams showed that the observed significant effect of forest age to the fungal alpha (adonis R2 = 0.235, P< <0.01) and beta diversity (adonis R2 = 0.231, P<0.05) differences is mainly attributed to the fungal communities of the young age class forests.
Figure 2Distribution of observed richness of ECM fungal communities at the family (a) and OTU level of the most abundant ECM fungal family (b) across the three forest age classes visualized by heatmap.
Goodness of fit statistics or squared coefficients of environmental variables fitted to the Nonmetric Multi-dimensional Scaling (NMDS) ordination space of fungal, Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and ECM fungal communities.
| Environmental variables | Fungi | Ascomycota | Basidiomycota | ECM fungi |
| Forest age |
| 0.043 |
|
|
| Elevation (m) | 0.188 | 0.042 |
| 0.250 |
| Herb layer cover (%) | 0.052 | 0.004 | 0.266 | 0.238 |
| Tree layer cover (%) |
| 0.063 |
|
|
| Deadwood cover (%) | 0.123 | 0.006 |
|
|
| Bare soil cover (%) | 0.083 | 0.244 | 0.242 | 0.087 |
| Rock cover (%) |
|
| 0.133 | 0.337 |
| Litter layer (thickness, cm) |
| 0.312 | 0.288 |
|
| Herb species richness | 0.209 | 0.127 | 0.484 | 0.071 |
| Tree species richness | 0.418 |
| 0.189 | 0.307 |
| Herbaceous biomass (g) | 0.025 | 0.137 | 0.374 | 0.368 |
| Woody plant biomass (<1 m) (g) |
| 0.089 |
|
|
| Litter biomass (dry weight, g) | 0.159 | 0.055 | 0.103 | 0.094 |
| Sand (%) |
|
| 0.091 | 0.386 |
| Clay (%) | 0.154 |
| 0.171 | 0.405 |
| Soil organic carbon (%) |
|
| 0.184 | 0.506 |
| C/N | 0.382 | 0.429 | 0.035 | 0.031 |
| pHKCl | 0.342 | 0.277 | 0.179 | 0.460 |
P<0.05,
P<0.01,
P<0.001, Fungi = Kingdom Fungi.
Significant correlations (Bonferroni corrected P<0.05) are presented in bold.
Figure 3Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination of the study plots across three forest age classes (Y: Young, M: Medium, O: Old) based on fungal communities of (a) kingdom fungi and (b) ectomycorrhizal fungi.
In each diagram, soil and plant characteristics that showed a significant goodness of fit based on post-hoc correlations (P≤0.05) are represented as vectors. Stress values represent percentages.
Influence of forest age, elevation of the study site and soil organic carbon (SOC) on the fungal community composition.
| Factors | Fungi | Ascomycota | Basidiomycota | ECM fungi | ||||
| F Model | R2 | F Model | R2 | F Model | R2 | F Model | R2 | |
| Forest age | 1.843 |
| 1.424 | 0.100 | 2.015 |
| 1.924 |
|
| SOC | 1.633 |
| 1.883 |
| 1.515 |
| 1.434 |
|
| Elevation | 1.294 | 0.095 | 1.305 | 0.091 | 1.407 |
| 1.402 |
|
| Forest age:SOC | 1.146 | 0.084 | 1.271 | 0.089 | 1.132 | 0.082 | 1.246 | 0.089 |
| Forest age:Elevation | 1.130 | 0.083 | 1.208 | 0.084 | 1.224 | 0.089 | 1.391 |
|
| SOC:Elevation | 1.182 | 0.087 | 1.196 | 0.084 | 1.270 | 0.092 | 1.448 |
|
| Forest age:SOC:Elevation | 1.372 |
| 2.013 |
| 1.169 | 0.085 | 1.205 | 0.086 |
Significant values (P<0.05) of the permutational multivariate analysis of variance results are presented in bold.
P<0.05,
P<0.01,
P<0.001, Fungi = Kingdom Fungi.
Correspondence of fungal communities with all plant, ECM plant and non-ECM plant species communities based on Procrustes correlation analysis with Bonferroni corrected P values.
| Fungal taxonomic level | Plant community | ECM plant community | Non-ECM plant community |
| Fungal community |
|
|
|
| Ascomycetous community |
|
|
|
| Basidiomycetous community |
|
|
|
| ECM fungal community |
|
|
|
ns: not significant; r: Procrustes correlation coefficients.