Literature DB >> 17048736

Vision-for-action: the effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects.

Steven P Tipper1, Matthew A Paul, Amy E Hayes.   

Abstract

When a person views an object, the action the object evokes appears to be activated independently of the person's intention to act. We demonstrate two further properties of this vision-to-action process. First, it is not completely automatic, but is determined by the stimulus properties of the object that are attended. Thus, when a person discriminates the shape of an object, action affordance effects are observed; but when a person discriminates an object's color, no affordance effects are observed. The former, shape property is associated with action, such as how an object might be grasped; the latter, color property is irrelevant to action. Second, we also show that the action state of an object influences evoked action. Thus, active objects, with which current action is implied, produce larger affordance effects than passive objects, with which no action is implied. We suggest that the active object activates action simulation processes similar to those proposed in mirror systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17048736     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects.

Authors:  R Ellis; M Tucker
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2000-11

2.  I know what you are doing. a neurophysiological study.

Authors:  M A Umiltà; E Kohler; V Gallese; L Fogassi; L Fadiga; C Keysers; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-07-19       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons.

Authors:  Evelyne Kohler; Christian Keysers; M Alessandra Umiltà; Leonardo Fogassi; Vittorio Gallese; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-02       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Action priming by briefly presented objects.

Authors:  Mike Tucker; Rob Ellis
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2004-06

5.  Mirror neurons responding to observation of actions made with tools in monkey ventral premotor cortex.

Authors:  Pier Francesco Ferrari; Stefano Rozzi; Leonardo Fogassi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.

Authors:  M Tucker; R Ellis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation.

Authors:  J R Simon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-07

8.  S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: evidence of the detection of affordances.

Authors:  C F Michaels
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Spontaneous decay of response-code activation.

Authors:  B Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994

Review 10.  The mirror-neuron system.

Authors:  Giacomo Rizzolatti; Laila Craighero
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

View more
  44 in total

1.  Priorities for representation: Task settings and object interaction both influence object memory.

Authors:  Clare Kirtley; Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

2.  Inhibition of return and action affordances.

Authors:  Helen M Morgan; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dissociating networks of imitation.

Authors:  Mareike M Menz; Adam McNamara; Jane Klemen; Ferdinand Binkofski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.

Authors:  Samuel Couth; Emma Gowen; Ellen Poliakoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A test of the embodied simulation theory of object perception: potentiation of responses to artifacts and animals.

Authors:  Heath E Matheson; Nicole C White; Patricia A McMullen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-20

6.  Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Yoriko Hirose; Sarah K Finnegan; Riina Pievilainen; Clare Kirtley; Alan Kennedy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The Stroop-matching task as a tool to study the correspondence effect using images of graspable and non-graspable objects.

Authors:  Ariane Leão Caldas; Walter Machado-Pinheiro; Olga Daneyko; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-04-27

8.  Correspondence effect driven by salient visual asymmetries in integral object stimuli.

Authors:  Antonello Pellicano; Cristina Iani; Natale Vincenzo Maiorana; Houpand Horoufchin; Sandro Rubichi; Luisa Lugli; Roberto Nicoletti; Ferdinand Binkofski
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-21

9.  How action performance affects object perception.

Authors:  Marcello Costantini; Luca Tommasi; Corrado Sinigaglia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Gesturing Meaning: Non-action Words Activate the Motor System.

Authors:  Patric Bach; Debra Griffiths; Matthias Weigelt; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.