Literature DB >> 19921595

When motor attention improves selective attention: the dissociating role of saliency.

Ed Symes1, Giovanni Ottoboni, Mike Tucker, Rob Ellis, Alessia Tessari.   

Abstract

There is evidence that preparing and maintaining a motor plan ("motor attention") can bias visual selective attention. For example, a motor attended grasp biases visual attention to select appropriately graspable object features (Symes, Tucker, Ellis, Vainio, & Ottoboni, 2008). According to the biased competition model of selective attention, the relative weightings of stimulus-driven and goal-directed factors determine selection. The current study investigated how the goal-directed bias of motor attention might operate when the stimulus-driven salience of the target was varied. Using a change detection task, two almost identical photographed scenes of simplistic graspable objects were presented flickering back and forth. The target object changed visually, and this change was either high or low salience. Target salience determined whether or not the motor attended grasp significantly biased visual selective attention. Specifically, motor attention only had a reliable influence on target detection times when the visual salience of the target was low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19921595     DOI: 10.1080/17470210903380806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  9 in total

1.  Perceiving object dangerousness: an escape from pain?

Authors:  Filomena Anelli; Mariagrazia Ranzini; Roberto Nicoletti; Anna M Borghi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Attentional capture for tool images is driven by the head end of the tool, not the handle.

Authors:  Rafal M Skiba; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Visual and linguistic cues to graspable objects.

Authors:  Andriy Myachykov; Rob Ellis; Angelo Cangelosi; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Gesturing Meaning: Non-action Words Activate the Motor System.

Authors:  Patric Bach; Debra Griffiths; Matthias Weigelt; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Integrating Action and Language through Biased Competition.

Authors:  Ed Symes; Mike Tucker; Giovanni Ottoboni
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Brian Hopkins; R Christopher Miall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Selective Age Effects on Visual Attention and Motor Attention during a Cued Saccade Task.

Authors:  Wendy E Huddleston; Brad E Ernest; Kevin G Keenan
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Distinct saccade planning and endogenous visuospatial attention maps in parietal cortex: A basis for functional differences in sensory and motor attention.

Authors:  Wendy E Huddleston; Alex N Swanson; James R Lytle; Michael S Aleksandrowicz
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Investigating ideomotor cognition with motorvisual priming paradigms: key findings, methodological challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.