Literature DB >> 23814640

Statistical Methods for Proteomic Biomarker Discovery based on Feature Extraction or Functional Modeling Approaches.

Jeffrey S Morris.   

Abstract

In recent years, developments in molecular biotechnology have led to the increased promise of detecting and validating biomarkers, or molecular markers that relate to various biological or medical outcomes. Proteomics, the direct study of proteins in biological samples, plays an important role in the biomarker discovery process. These technologies produce complex, high dimensional functional and image data that present many analytical challenges that must be addressed properly for effective comparative proteomics studies that can yield potential biomarkers. Specific challenges include experimental design, preprocessing, feature extraction, and statistical analysis accounting for the inherent multiple testing issues. This paper reviews various computational aspects of comparative proteomic studies, and summarizes contributions I along with numerous collaborators have made. First, there is an overview of comparative proteomics technologies, followed by a discussion of important experimental design and preprocessing issues that must be considered before statistical analysis can be done. Next, the two key approaches to analyzing proteomics data, feature extraction and functional modeling, are described. Feature extraction involves detection and quantification of discrete features like peaks or spots that theoretically correspond to different proteins in the sample. After an overview of the feature extraction approach, specific methods for mass spectrometry (Cromwell) and 2D gel electrophoresis (Pinnacle) are described. The functional modeling approach involves modeling the proteomic data in their entirety as functions or images. A general discussion of the approach is followed by the presentation of a specific method that can be applied, wavelet-based functional mixed models, and its extensions. All methods are illustrated by application to two example proteomic data sets, one from mass spectrometry and one from 2D gel electrophoresis. While the specific methods presented are applied to two specific proteomic technologies, MALDI-TOF and 2D gel electrophoresis, these methods and the other principles discussed in the paper apply much more broadly to other expression proteomics technologies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D Gel Electrophoresis; Bayesian Methods; Biomarkers; Classification; False Discovery Rate; Functional Data Analysis; Functional Mixed Models; MALDI-TOF; Mass Spectrometry; Multiple Testing; Nonparametric Regression; Proteomics; Reproducibility; Robust Regression; Wavelets

Year:  2012        PMID: 23814640      PMCID: PMC3693398          DOI: 10.4310/sii.2012.v5.n1.a11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Interface        ISSN: 1938-7989            Impact factor:   0.582


  40 in total

1.  AUTOMATED ANALYSIS OF QUANTITATIVE IMAGE DATA USING ISOMORPHIC FUNCTIONAL MIXED MODELS, WITH APPLICATION TO PROTEOMICS DATA.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Morris; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Richard C Herrick; Pietro Sanna; Howard Gutstein
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  High-resolution serum proteomic features for ovarian cancer detection.

Authors:  T P Conrads; V A Fusaro; S Ross; D Johann; V Rajapakse; B A Hitt; S M Steinberg; E C Kohn; D A Fishman; G Whitely; J C Barrett; L A Liotta; E F Petricoin; T D Veenstra
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.678

3.  Statistical contributions to proteomic research.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Morris; Keith A Baggerly; Howard B Gutstein; Kevin R Coombes
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

Review 4.  The importance of experimental design in proteomic mass spectrometry experiments: some cautionary tales.

Authors:  Jianhua Hu; Kevin R Coombes; Jeffrey S Morris; Keith A Baggerly
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic       Date:  2005-02

5.  Maximising sensitivity for detecting changes in protein expression: experimental design using minimal CyDyes.

Authors:  Natasha A Karp; Kathryn S Lilley
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Bayesian analysis of mass spectrometry proteomic data using wavelet-based functional mixed models.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Morris; Philip J Brown; Richard C Herrick; Keith A Baggerly; Kevin R Coombes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Pinnacle: a fast, automatic and accurate method for detecting and quantifying protein spots in 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis data.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Morris; Brittan N Clark; Howard B Gutstein
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Improved peak detection and quantification of mass spectrometry data acquired from surface-enhanced laser desorption and ionization by denoising spectra with the undecimated discrete wavelet transform.

Authors:  Kevin R Coombes; Spiridon Tsavachidis; Jeffrey S Morris; Keith A Baggerly; Mien-Chie Hung; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.984

9.  Robust classification of functional and quantitative image data using functional mixed models.

Authors:  Hongxiao Zhu; Philip J Brown; Jeffrey S Morris
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.

Authors:  Susmita Datta; Somnath Datta
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison and Contrast of Two General Functional Regression Modeling Frameworks.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Morris
Journal:  Stat Modelling       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.039

2.  Statistical Contributions to Bioinformatics: Design, Modeling, Structure Learning, and Integration.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Morris; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani
Journal:  Stat Modelling       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.039

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.