Literature DB >> 17888041

Bayesian analysis of mass spectrometry proteomic data using wavelet-based functional mixed models.

Jeffrey S Morris1, Philip J Brown, Richard C Herrick, Keith A Baggerly, Kevin R Coombes.   

Abstract

In this article, we apply the recently developed Bayesian wavelet-based functional mixed model methodology to analyze MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry proteomic data. By modeling mass spectra as functions, this approach avoids reliance on peak detection methods. The flexibility of this framework in modeling nonparametric fixed and random effect functions enables it to model the effects of multiple factors simultaneously, allowing one to perform inference on multiple factors of interest using the same model fit, while adjusting for clinical or experimental covariates that may affect both the intensities and locations of peaks in the spectra. For example, this provides a straightforward way to account for systematic block and batch effects that characterize these data. From the model output, we identify spectral regions that are differentially expressed across experimental conditions, in a way that takes both statistical and clinical significance into account and controls the Bayesian false discovery rate to a prespecified level. We apply this method to two cancer studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17888041      PMCID: PMC2659628          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00895.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  16 in total

1.  Functional mixed effects models.

Authors:  Wensheng Guo
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Detecting differential gene expression with a semiparametric hierarchical mixture method.

Authors:  Michael A Newton; Amine Noueiry; Deepayan Sarkar; Paul Ahlquist
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Plasma protein profiling for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer reveals the presence of host response proteins.

Authors:  John M Koomen; Lichen Nancy Shih; Kevin R Coombes; Donghui Li; Lian-chun Xiao; Isaiah J Fidler; James L Abbruzzese; Ryuji Kobayashi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Feature extraction and quantification for mass spectrometry in biomedical applications using the mean spectrum.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Morris; Kevin R Coombes; John Koomen; Keith A Baggerly; Ryuji Kobayashi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  The importance of experimental design in proteomic mass spectrometry experiments: some cautionary tales.

Authors:  Jianhua Hu; Kevin R Coombes; Jeffrey S Morris; Keith A Baggerly
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic       Date:  2005-02

6.  What have we learned from proteomic studies of serum?

Authors:  Thomas P Conrads; Timothy D Veenstra
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.940

7.  Correcting common errors in identifying cancer-specific serum peptide signatures.

Authors:  Josep Villanueva; John Philip; Carlos A Chaparro; Yongbiao Li; Ricardo Toledo-Crow; Lin DeNoyer; Martin Fleisher; Richard J Robbins; Paul Tempst
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Improved peak detection and quantification of mass spectrometry data acquired from surface-enhanced laser desorption and ionization by denoising spectra with the undecimated discrete wavelet transform.

Authors:  Kevin R Coombes; Spiridon Tsavachidis; Jeffrey S Morris; Keith A Baggerly; Mien-Chie Hung; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.984

9.  Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: comparing datasets from different experiments.

Authors:  Keith A Baggerly; Jeffrey S Morris; Kevin R Coombes
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  A data-analytic strategy for protein biomarker discovery: profiling of high-dimensional proteomic data for cancer detection.

Authors:  Yutaka Yasui; Margaret Pepe; Mary Lou Thompson; Bao-Ling Adam; George L Wright; Yinsheng Qu; John D Potter; Marcy Winget; Mark Thornquist; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.899

View more
  41 in total

1.  Bayesian Random Segmentation Models to Identify Shared Copy Number Aberrations for Array CGH Data.

Authors:  Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Yuan Ji; Rajesh Talluri; Luis E Nieto-Barajas; Jeffrey S Morris
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  AUTOMATED ANALYSIS OF QUANTITATIVE IMAGE DATA USING ISOMORPHIC FUNCTIONAL MIXED MODELS, WITH APPLICATION TO PROTEOMICS DATA.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Morris; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Richard C Herrick; Pietro Sanna; Howard Gutstein
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Probabilistic mixture regression models for alignment of LC-MS data.

Authors:  Getachew K Befekadu; Mahlet G Tadesse; Tsung-Heng Tsai; Habtom W Ressom
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Bayesian ensemble methods for survival prediction in gene expression data.

Authors:  Vinicius Bonato; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Bradley M Broom; Erik P Sulman; Kenneth D Aldape; Kim-Anh Do
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Robust, Adaptive Functional Regression in Functional Mixed Model Framework.

Authors:  Hongxiao Zhu; Philip J Brown; Jeffrey S Morris
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Integrative Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging-genetic data with application to cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Shabnam Azadeh; Brian P Hobbs; Liangsuo Ma; David A Nielsen; F Gerard Moeller; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A Study of Mexican Free-Tailed Bat Chirp Syllables: Bayesian Functional Mixed Models for Nonstationary Acoustic Time Series.

Authors:  Josue G Martinez; Kirsten M Bohn; Raymond J Carroll; Jeffrey S Morris
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Sparse Semiparametric Nonlinear Model with Application to Chromatographic Fingerprints.

Authors:  Michael R Wierzbicki; Li-Bing Guo; Qing-Tao Du; Wensheng Guo
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  WAVELET-BASED GENETIC ASSOCIATION ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONAL PHENOTYPES ARISING FROM HIGH-THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING ASSAYS.

Authors:  Heejung Shim; Matthew Stephens
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.083

10.  A Bayesian based functional mixed-effects model for analysis of LC-MS data.

Authors:  Getachew K Befekadu; Mahlet G Tadesse; Habtom W Ressom
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.