Jeffrey S Morris1, Brittan N Clark, Howard B Gutstein. 1. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 447, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA. jefmorris@mdanderson.org
Abstract
MOTIVATION: One of the key limitations for proteomic studies using 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) is the lack of rapid, robust and reproducible methods for detecting, matching and quantifying protein spots. The most commonly used approaches involve first detecting spots and drawing spot boundaries on individual gels, then matching spots across gels and finally quantifying each spot by calculating normalized spot volumes. This approach is time consuming, error-prone and frequently requires extensive manual editing, which can unintentionally introduce bias into the results. RESULTS: We introduce a new method for spot detection and quantification called Pinnacle that is automatic, quick, sensitive and specific and yields spot quantifications that are reliable and precise. This method incorporates a spot definition that is based on simple, straightforward criteria rather than complex arbitrary definitions, and results in no missing data. Using dilution series for validation, we demonstrate Pinnacle outperformed two well-established 2DE analysis packages, proving to be more accurate and yielding smaller coefficiant of variations (CVs). More accurate quantifications may lead to increased power for detecting differentially expressed spots, an idea supported by the results of our group comparison experiment. Our fast, automatic analysis method makes it feasible to conduct very large 2DE-based proteomic studies that are adequately powered to find important protein expression differences. AVAILABILITY: Matlab code to implement Pinnacle is available from the authors upon request for non-commercial use.
MOTIVATION: One of the key limitations for proteomic studies using 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) is the lack of rapid, robust and reproducible methods for detecting, matching and quantifying protein spots. The most commonly used approaches involve first detecting spots and drawing spot boundaries on individual gels, then matching spots across gels and finally quantifying each spot by calculating normalized spot volumes. This approach is time consuming, error-prone and frequently requires extensive manual editing, which can unintentionally introduce bias into the results. RESULTS: We introduce a new method for spot detection and quantification called Pinnacle that is automatic, quick, sensitive and specific and yields spot quantifications that are reliable and precise. This method incorporates a spot definition that is based on simple, straightforward criteria rather than complex arbitrary definitions, and results in no missing data. Using dilution series for validation, we demonstrate Pinnacle outperformed two well-established 2DE analysis packages, proving to be more accurate and yielding smaller coefficiant of variations (CVs). More accurate quantifications may lead to increased power for detecting differentially expressed spots, an idea supported by the results of our group comparison experiment. Our fast, automatic analysis method makes it feasible to conduct very large 2DE-based proteomic studies that are adequately powered to find important protein expression differences. AVAILABILITY: Matlab code to implement Pinnacle is available from the authors upon request for non-commercial use.
Authors: Jeffrey S Morris; Kevin R Coombes; John Koomen; Keith A Baggerly; Ryuji Kobayashi Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2005-01-26 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Yuan Ji; Rajesh Talluri; Luis E Nieto-Barajas; Jeffrey S Morris Journal: J Am Stat Assoc Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Jeffrey S Morris; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Richard C Herrick; Pietro Sanna; Howard Gutstein Journal: Ann Appl Stat Date: 2011-01-01 Impact factor: 2.083
Authors: Andrew W Dowsey; Jane A English; Frederique Lisacek; Jeffrey S Morris; Guang-Zhong Yang; Michael J Dunn Journal: Proteomics Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Howard B Gutstein; Jeffrey S Morris; Suresh P Annangudi; Jonathan V Sweedler Journal: Mass Spectrom Rev Date: 2008 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 10.946