Literature DB >> 23813981

The shared genome is a pervasive constraint on the evolution of sex-biased gene expression.

Robert M Griffin1, Rebecca Dean, Jaime L Grace, Patrik Rydén, Urban Friberg.   

Abstract

Males and females share most of their genomes, and differences between the sexes can therefore not evolve through sequence divergence in protein coding genes. Sexual dimorphism is instead restricted to occur through sex-specific expression and splicing of gene products. Evolution of sexual dimorphism through these mechanisms should, however, also be constrained when the sexes share the genetic architecture for regulation of gene expression. Despite these obstacles, sexual dimorphism is prevalent in the animal kingdom and commonly evolves rapidly. Here, we ask whether the genetic architecture of gene expression is plastic and easily molded by sex-specific selection, or if sexual dimorphism evolves rapidly despite pervasive genetic constraint. To address this question, we explore the relationship between the intersexual genetic correlation for gene expression (rMF), which captures how independently genes are regulated in the sexes, and the evolution of sex-biased gene expression. Using transcriptome data from Drosophila melanogaster, we find that most genes have a high rMF and that genes currently exposed to sexually antagonistic selection have a higher average rMF than other genes. We further show that genes with a high rMF have less pronounced sex-biased gene expression than genes with a low rMF within D. melanogaster and that the strength of the rMF in D. melanogaster predicts the degree to which the sex bias of a gene's expression has changed between D. melanogaster and six other species in the Drosophila genus. In sum, our results show that a shared genome constrains both short- and long-term evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetic constraint; sex-biased gene expression; sexual dimorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23813981     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  35 in total

1.  Contrasting effects of intralocus sexual conflict on sexually antagonistic coevolution.

Authors:  Tanya M Pennell; Freek J H de Haas; Edward H Morrow; G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evolutionary inevitability of sexual antagonism.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Heightened condition-dependence of the sexual transcriptome as a function of genetic quality in Drosophila melanogaster head tissue.

Authors:  Antonino Malacrinò; Christopher M Kimber; Martin Brengdahl; Urban Friberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Quantifying maladaptation during the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Genevieve Matthews; Sandra Hangartner; David G Chapple; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Genetic constraints on microevolutionary divergence of sex-biased gene expression.

Authors:  Scott L Allen; Russell Bonduriansky; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Sexually antagonistic selection promotes genetic divergence between males and females in an ant.

Authors:  Pierre-André Eyer; Alexander J Blumenfeld; Edward L Vargo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Sexual dimorphism and rapid turnover in gene expression in pre-reproductive seedlings of a dioecious herb.

Authors:  Guillaume G Cossard; Melissa A Toups; John R Pannell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Is the X chromosome a hot spot for sexually antagonistic polymorphisms? Biases in current empirical tests of classical theory.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.