Literature DB >> 31288700

Heightened condition-dependence of the sexual transcriptome as a function of genetic quality in Drosophila melanogaster head tissue.

Antonino Malacrinò1,2, Christopher M Kimber1, Martin Brengdahl1, Urban Friberg1.   

Abstract

Theory suggests sexual traits should show heightened condition-dependent expression. This prediction has been tested extensively in experiments where condition has been manipulated through environmental quality. Condition-dependence as a function of genetic quality has, however, only rarely been addressed, despite its central importance in evolutionary theory. To address the effect of genetic quality on expression of sexual and non-sexual traits, we here compare gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster head tissue between flies with intact genomes (high condition) and flies carrying a major deleterious mutation (low condition). We find that sex-biased genes show heightened condition-dependent expression in both sexes, and that expression in low condition males and females regresses towards a more similar expression profile. As predicted, sex-biased expression was more sensitive to condition in males compared to females, but surprisingly female-biased, rather than male-biased, genes show higher sensitivity to condition in both sexes. Our results thus support the fundamental predictions of the theory of condition-dependence when condition is a function of genetic quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; condition-dependence; gene expression; genetic quality; sexual dimorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31288700      PMCID: PMC6650720          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  43 in total

1.  Condition dependence of sexual ornament size and variation in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae).

Authors:  Samuel Cotton; Kevin Fowler; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process.

Authors:  A Grafen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Differential effects of genetic vs. environmental quality in Drosophila melanogaster suggest multiple forms of condition dependence.

Authors:  Russell Bonduriansky; Martin A Mallet; Devin Arbuthnott; Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn; Juan José Egozcue; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE "HANDICAP" PRINCIPLE.

Authors:  Yoh Iwasa; Andrew Pomiankowski; Sean Nee
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Sexual dimorphism and heightened conditional expression in a sexually selected weapon in the Asian rhinoceros beetle.

Authors:  Robert Zinna; Douglas Emlen; Laura C Lavine; Annika Johns; Hiroki Gotoh; Teruyuki Niimi; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  The DrosDel deletion collection: a Drosophila genomewide chromosomal deficiency resource.

Authors:  Edward Ryder; Michael Ashburner; Rosa Bautista-Llacer; Jenny Drummond; Jane Webster; Glynnis Johnson; Terri Morley; Yuk Sang Chan; Fiona Blows; Darin Coulson; Gunter Reuter; Heiko Baisch; Christian Apelt; Andreas Kauk; Thomas Rudolph; Maria Kube; Melanie Klimm; Claudia Nickel; Janos Szidonya; Peter Maróy; Margit Pal; Asa Rasmuson-Lestander; Karin Ekström; Hugo Stocker; Christoph Hugentobler; Ernst Hafen; David Gubb; Gert Pflugfelder; Christian Dorner; Bernard Mechler; Heide Schenkel; Joachim Marhold; Florenci Serras; Montserrat Corominas; Adrià Punset; John Roote; Steven Russell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  X Chromosome and Autosome Dosage Responses in Drosophila melanogaster Heads.

Authors:  Zhen-Xia Chen; Brian Oliver
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.

Authors:  Michael I Love; Wolfgang Huber; Simon Anders
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  The transcriptomic basis of tissue- and nutrition-dependent sexual dimorphism in the beetle Onthophagus taurus.

Authors:  Cristina C Ledón-Rettig; Armin P Moczek
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Sexual traits are sensitive to genetic stress and predict extinction risk in the stalk-eyed fly, Diasemopsis meigenii.

Authors:  Lawrence Bellamy; Nadine Chapman; Kevin Fowler; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sex-specific responses to cold in a very cold-tolerant, northern Drosophila species.

Authors:  Darren J Parker; Tapio Envall; Michael G Ritchie; Maaria Kankare
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Ageing desexualizes the Drosophila brain transcriptome.

Authors:  Antonino Malacrinò; Martin I Brengdahl; Christopher M Kimber; Avani Mital; Vinesh N Shenoi; Claudio Mirabello; Urban Friberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 5.530

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.