Literature DB >> 23813466

Computational analysis shows why transcranial alternating current stimulation induces retinal phosphenes.

Ilkka Laakso1, Akimasa Hirata.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), which is a novel technique for the manipulation of cortical oscillations, can generate subjective visual sensations (phosphenes). In this work, we computationally investigate the current that reaches the eyes from tACS electrodes in order to show that phosphenes induced by tACS are retinal in origin. APPROACH: The finite-element method is used for modelling the path of the current in an anatomically realistic model of the head for various electrode montages. The computational results are used for analysing previous experimental data to investigate the sensitivity of the eye to electrical stimulation. MAIN
RESULTS: Depending on the locations of both the stimulating and reference electrodes, a small portion of the stimulation current chooses a path that goes through the eyes. Due to the sensitivity of the retina to electrical stimulation, even distant electrodes can produce a sufficiently strong current at the eyes for inducing retinal phosphenes. SIGNIFICANCE: The interference from retinal phosphenes needs to be considered in the design of tACS experiments. The occurrence of phosphenes can be reduced by optimizing the locations of the electrodes, or potentially increasing the number of reference electrodes to two or more. Computational modelling is an effective tool for guiding the electrode positioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23813466     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/4/046009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  33 in total

1.  Impact of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields on human postural control.

Authors:  Sebastien Villard; Alicia Allen; Nicolas Bouisset; Michael Corbacio; Alex Thomas; Michel Guerraz; Alexandre Legros
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  [Transcranial alternating current stimulation. Entrainment and function control of neuronal networks].

Authors:  J Vosskuhl; D Strüber; C S Herrmann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Attenuates Neuronal Adaptation.

Authors:  Kohitij Kar; Jacob Duijnhouwer; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Retinal and visual cortex distance from transcranial magnetic stimulation of the vertex affects phosphene perception.

Authors:  Kelly Webster; Tony Ro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Current challenges: the ups and downs of tACS.

Authors:  Nicholas S Bland; Martin V Sale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Independent Causal Contributions of Alpha- and Beta-Band Oscillations during Movement Selection.

Authors:  Loek Brinkman; Arjen Stolk; Tom R Marshall; Sophie Esterer; Poppy Sharp; H Chris Dijkerman; Floris P de Lange; Ivan Toni
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Low-Frequency Conductivity Tensor Imaging of the Human Head In Vivo Using DT-MREIT: First Study.

Authors:  Munish Chauhan; Aprinda Indahlastari; Aditya K Kasinadhuni; Michael Schar; Thomas H Mareci; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Investigation of assumptions underlying current safety guidelines on EM-induced nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Esra Neufeld; Ioannis Vogiatzis Oikonomidis; Maria Ida Iacono; Leonardo M Angelone; Wolfgang Kainz; Niels Kuster
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Pnina Grossman; Chris Thomas; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Jimmy Jiang; Tatheer Adnan; Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Greg Kronberg; Dennis Truong; Paulo Boggio; André R Brunoni; Leigh Charvet; Felipe Fregni; Brita Fritsch; Bernadette Gillick; Roy H Hamilton; Benjamin M Hampstead; Ryan Jankord; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; David Liebetanz; Anli Liu; Colleen Loo; Michael A Nitsche; Janine Reis; Jessica D Richardson; Alexander Rotenberg; Peter E Turkeltaub; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.