Literature DB >> 23813452

CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores as predictors of left atrial ablation outcomes for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Konstantinos P Letsas1, Michael Efremidis, Georgios Giannopoulos, Spyridon Deftereos, Louiza Lioni, Panagiotis Korantzopoulos, Konstantinos Vlachos, Sotirios Xydonas, Charalampos Kossyvakis, Antonios Sideris.   

Abstract

AIMS: The selection of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) that will benefit most by left atrial ablation remains suboptimal. CHADS2 score has been shown to be associated with post-ablation AF recurrences. However, data regarding the CHA2DS2-VASc score are lacking. In addition, there is paucity of data regarding the exact predictive value, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, of each of these scores as to AF recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate the merit of the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores in predicting arrhythmia recurrence after a single ablation procedure for paroxysmal AF. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-six patients (78 males, median age 61 years) with symptomatic paroxysmal AF underwent left atrial ablation. Over 16 months (interquartile range: 10.8-26.0), 89 patients were recurrence-free (70.6%). Larger left atrial volume (P: 0.039), diabetes (P: 0.001), dyslipidemia (P: 0.003), coronary artery disease (P: 0.003), class III antiarrhythmic drugs (P: 0.017), CHADS2 (P: 0.006), and CHA2DS2-VASc (P: 0.016) scores were univariately associated with recurrence. In the multivariate analysis, both CHADS2 (hazard ratio: 1.91, 95% confidence interval 1.09-3.36, P: 0.023) and CHA2DS2-VASc (hazard ratio: 1.97, 95% confidence interval 1.16-3.33, P: 0.012) were independently associated with AF recurrence. Cut-off analysis showed that a score ≥2 for both the CHADS2 (sensitivity = 46% and specificity = 79%, area under the Receiver's operating characteristic curve, AUC = 0.644) and CHA2DS2-VASc score (sensitivity = 57% and specificity = 65%, AUC = 0.627) showed the highest predictive value for AF recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: CHA2DS2-VASc score is an independent predictor of left atrial ablation outcomes for paroxysmal AF, with a similar predictive value to CHADS2. However, the predictive accuracy of both is mediocre.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; CHA2DS2-VASc score; CHADS2 score; Catheter ablation; Recurrence

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23813452     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  26 in total

1.  The APPLE score: a novel and simple score for the prediction of rhythm outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Jelena Kornej; Gerhard Hindricks; M Benjamin Shoemaker; Daniela Husser; Arash Arya; Philipp Sommer; Sascha Rolf; Pablo Saavedra; Arvindh Kanagasundram; S Patrick Whalen; Jay Montgomery; Christopher R Ellis; Dawood Darbar; Andreas Bollmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Clinical scores used for the prediction of negative events in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Falco Kosich; Katja Schumacher; Tatjana Potpara; Gregory Y Lip; Gerhard Hindricks; Jelena Kornej
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Long-term clinical outcome and risk of catheter ablation in elderly with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Liquan Dong; Zidong Bie; Liye Sun; Xudong Pan; Lijuan Guo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

4.  Predictors of arrhythmia recurrence in patients with heart failure undergoing left atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  George Bazoukis; Konstantinos P Letsas; Gary Tse; Katerina K Naka; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos; Evangelia Ntzani; Konstantinos Vlachos; Athanasios Saplaouras; Eirini Pagkalidou; Lampros K Michalis; Antonios Sideris; Michael Efremidis
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 5.  Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: from Evidences to Guidelines.

Authors:  Arianna Cirasa; Carmelo La Greca; Domenico Pecora
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2021-04-04

Review 6.  Can oral anticoagulants be stopped safely after a successful atrial fibrillation ablation?

Authors:  Tze-Fan Chao; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Shih-Lin Chang; Li-Wei Lo; Yu-Feng Hu; Fa-Po Chung; Jo-Nan Liao; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Prediction of atrial fibrillation development and progression: Current perspectives.

Authors:  Konstantinos Vlachos; Konstantinos P Letsas; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos; Tong Liu; Stamatis Georgopoulos; Athanasios Bakalakos; Nikolaos Karamichalakis; Sotirios Xydonas; Michael Efremidis; Antonios Sideris
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-26

8.  Addition of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide to Existing Clinical Risk Scores Enhances Identification of Patients at Risk for Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Amir Y Shaikh; Nada Esa; William Martin-Doyle; Menhel Kinno; Iryna Nieto; Kevin C Floyd; Clifford Browning; Cynthia Ennis; J Kevin Donahue; Lawrence S Rosenthal; David D McManus
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2015-12

9.  Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation in Dependence of Left Atrial Volume Index.

Authors:  Malte Kranert; Tetyana Shchetynska-Marinova; Volker Liebe; Christina Doesch; Theano Papavassiliu; Ibrahim Akin; Martin Borggrefe; Anna Hohneck
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Adjunctive Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Mhanna; Azizullah Beran; Ahmad Al-Abdouh; Omar Sajdeya; Mohammed Altujjar; Modar Alom; Abdelrhman M Abumoawad; Ahmed M Elzanaty; Paul Chacko; Ehab A Eltahawy
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2021-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.