Mohammed Mhanna1, Azizullah Beran1, Ahmad Al-Abdouh2, Omar Sajdeya1, Mohammed Altujjar3, Modar Alom3, Abdelrhman M Abumoawad4, Ahmed M Elzanaty5, Paul Chacko5, Ehab A Eltahawy5. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Promedica Toledo hospital, Toledo, OH, USA. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA. 5. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be associated with limited efficacy. Due to its autonomic innervation, the vein of Marshall (VOM) is an attractive target during AF ablation. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive ethanol infusion of VOM (VOM-EI) in AF ablation. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of VOM-EI in AF ablation compared to AF catheter ablation alone. The primary outcome of interest was late (≥3 months) AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. The secondary outcomes included acute mitral isthmus bidirectional block (MIBB) and procedural complications (pericardial effusion, stroke, or atrio-esophageal fistula). Pooled relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of four studies, including 804 AF patients (68.2% with persistent AF, the mean age of 63.5±9.9 years, 401 patients underwent VOM-EI plus CA vs. 403 patients who had CA alone), were included in the final analysis. VOM-EI group was associated with a lower risk of late AF/AT recurrence (RR:0.63; 95% CI:0.46-0.87; P = 0.005), and increased probability to achieve acute MIBB (RR:1.39; 95% CI:1.08-1.79; P = 0.009) without an increase in procedural complications (RR:1.05; 95% CI:0.57-1.94; P = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that adjunctive VOM-EI strategy is more effective than conventional catheter ablation with similar safety profiles.
INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be associated with limited efficacy. Due to its autonomic innervation, the vein of Marshall (VOM) is an attractive target during AF ablation. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive ethanol infusion of VOM (VOM-EI) in AF ablation. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of VOM-EI in AF ablation compared to AF catheter ablation alone. The primary outcome of interest was late (≥3 months) AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. The secondary outcomes included acute mitral isthmus bidirectional block (MIBB) and procedural complications (pericardial effusion, stroke, or atrio-esophageal fistula). Pooled relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of four studies, including 804 AF patients (68.2% with persistent AF, the mean age of 63.5±9.9 years, 401 patients underwent VOM-EI plus CA vs. 403 patients who had CA alone), were included in the final analysis. VOM-EI group was associated with a lower risk of late AF/AT recurrence (RR:0.63; 95% CI:0.46-0.87; P = 0.005), and increased probability to achieve acute MIBB (RR:1.39; 95% CI:1.08-1.79; P = 0.009) without an increase in procedural complications (RR:1.05; 95% CI:0.57-1.94; P = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that adjunctive VOM-EI strategy is more effective than conventional catheter ablation with similar safety profiles.
Authors: J J Deeks; J Dinnes; R D'Amico; A J Sowden; C Sakarovitch; F Song; M Petticrew; D G Altman Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2003 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Jason G Andrade; Paul Khairy; Laurent Macle; Doug L Packer; John W Lehmann; Richard G Holcomb; Jeremy N Ruskin; Marc Dubuc Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2014-01-19
Authors: Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-07-21
Authors: Scott D Corley; Andrew E Epstein; John P DiMarco; Michael J Domanski; Nancy Geller; H Leon Greene; Richard A Josephson; Joyce C Kellen; Richard C Klein; Andrew D Krahn; Mary Mickel; L Brent Mitchell; Joy Dalquist Nelson; Yves Rosenberg; Eleanor Schron; Lynn Shemanski; Albert L Waldo; D George Wyse Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-03-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Miguel Valderrábano; Leif E Peterson; Vijay Swarup; Paul A Schurmann; Akash Makkar; Rahul N Doshi; David DeLurgio; Charles A Athill; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Andrea Natale; Jayanthi Koneru; Amish S Dave; Irakli Giorgberidze; Hamid Afshar; Michelle L Guthrie; Raquel Bunge; Carlos A Morillo; Neal S Kleiman Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Julian P T Higgins; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Peter Jüni; David Moher; Andrew D Oxman; Jelena Savovic; Kenneth F Schulz; Laura Weeks; Jonathan A C Sterne Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-10-18