Amir Y Shaikh1, Nada Esa, William Martin-Doyle, Menhel Kinno, Iryna Nieto, Kevin C Floyd, Clifford Browning, Cynthia Ennis, J Kevin Donahue, Lawrence S Rosenthal, David D McManus. 1. From the *Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA; †Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; ‡Department of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ; §Division of Cardiology and Electrophysiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA; and ¶Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Predicting which patients will be free from atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains challenging. Clinical risk prediction scores show modest ability to identify patients at risk for AF recurrence after PVI. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is associated with risk for incident and recurrent AF but is not currently included in existing AF risk scores. We sought to evaluate the incremental benefit of adding preoperative BNP to existing risk scores for predicting AF recurrence during the 6 months after PVI. METHODS: One hundred sixty-one patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF underwent an index PVI procedure between 2010 and 2013; 77 patients (48%) had late AF recurrence after PVI (>3 months post-PVI) over the 6-month follow-up period. RESULTS: A BNP greater than or equal to 100 pg/dL (P=0.01) and AF recurrence within 3 months after PVI (P<0.001) were associated with late AF recurrence in multivariate analyses. Addition of BNP to existing clinical risk scores significantly improved the areas under the curve for each score, with an integrated discrimination improvement of 0.08 (P=0.001) and a net reclassification improvement of 60% (P=0.001) for all risk scores. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating BNP levels are independently associated with late AF recurrence after PVI. Inclusion of BNP significantly improves the discriminative ability of CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, R2CHADS2, and the HATCH score in predicting clinically significant, late AF recurrence after PVI and should be incorporated in decision-making algorithms for management of AF. B-R2CHADS2 is the best score model for prediction of late AF recurrence.
INTRODUCTION: Predicting which patients will be free from atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains challenging. Clinical risk prediction scores show modest ability to identify patients at risk for AF recurrence after PVI. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is associated with risk for incident and recurrent AF but is not currently included in existing AF risk scores. We sought to evaluate the incremental benefit of adding preoperative BNP to existing risk scores for predicting AF recurrence during the 6 months after PVI. METHODS: One hundred sixty-one patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF underwent an index PVI procedure between 2010 and 2013; 77 patients (48%) had late AF recurrence after PVI (>3 months post-PVI) over the 6-month follow-up period. RESULTS: A BNP greater than or equal to 100 pg/dL (P=0.01) and AF recurrence within 3 months after PVI (P<0.001) were associated with late AF recurrence in multivariate analyses. Addition of BNP to existing clinical risk scores significantly improved the areas under the curve for each score, with an integrated discrimination improvement of 0.08 (P=0.001) and a net reclassification improvement of 60% (P=0.001) for all risk scores. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating BNP levels are independently associated with late AF recurrence after PVI. Inclusion of BNP significantly improves the discriminative ability of CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, R2CHADS2, and the HATCH score in predicting clinically significant, late AF recurrence after PVI and should be incorporated in decision-making algorithms for management of AF. B-R2CHADS2 is the best score model for prediction of late AF recurrence.
Authors: Matthias K Freynhofer; Rudolf Jarai; Thomas Höchtl; Veronika Bruno; Birgit Vogel; Kadriye Aydinkoc; Michael Nürnberg; Johann Wojta; Kurt Huber Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: F D'Ascenzo; A Corleto; G Biondi-Zoccai; M Anselmino; F Ferraris; L di Biase; A Natale; R J Hunter; R J Schilling; S Miyazaki; H Tada; K Aonuma; L Yenn-Jiang; H Tao; C Ma; D Packer; S Hammill; F Gaita Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Sanghamitra Mohanty; Prasant Mohanty; Luigi Di Biase; Bai Rong; David Burkhardt; Joseph G Gallinghouse; Rodney Horton; Javier E Sanchez; Shane Bailey; Jason Zagrodzky; Andrea Natale Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2011-03-03
Authors: Venkatesh Y Anjan; Timothy M Loftus; Michael A Burke; Nausheen Akhter; Gregg C Fonarow; Mihai Gheorghiade; Sanjiv J Shah Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Jelena Kornej; Gerhard Hindricks; Jedrzej Kosiuk; Arash Arya; Philipp Sommer; Daniela Husser; Sascha Rolf; Sergio Richter; Christopher Piorkowski; Thomas Gaspar; Gregory Y H Lip; Andreas Bollmann Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2013-09-18
Authors: Kristen K Patton; Patrick T Ellinor; Susan R Heckbert; Robert H Christenson; Christopher DeFilippi; John S Gottdiener; Richard A Kronmal Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-10-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Douglas L Packer; Robert C Kowal; Kevin R Wheelan; James M Irwin; Jean Champagne; Peter G Guerra; Marc Dubuc; Vivek Reddy; Linda Nelson; Richard G Holcomb; John W Lehmann; Jeremy N Ruskin Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mayank Sardana; Adedotun A Ogunsua; Matthew Spring; Amir Shaikh; Owusu Asamoah; Glenn Stokken; Clifford Browning; Cynthia Ennis; J Kevin Donahue; Lawrence S Rosenthal; Kevin C Floyd; Gerard P Aurigemma; Nisha I Parikh; David D McManus Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 2.942