Literature DB >> 23807934

Comparison of panoramic radiography with cone beam CT in predicting the relationship of the mandibular third molar roots to the alveolar canal.

Shoaleh Shahidi1, Barbod Zamiri, Pegah Bronoosh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preoperative radiographic assessment of the mandibular third molars is essential to prevent inferior alveolar nerve damage during extraction. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of panoramic signs of association between the roots of teeth and the canal, and to compare the panoramic signs with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT images of 132 impacted mandibular third molars were evaluated to determine the association of the root to the canal. The CBCT findings were compared with the corresponding panoramic images. Logistic regression analysis was used to define the diagnostic criteria of the panoramic images.
RESULTS: AMONG THE PANORAMIC SIGNS, LOSS OF THE CORTICAL LINE WAS THE MOST FREQUENT RADIOGRAPHIC SIGN PREDICTING ASSOCIATION (SENSITIVITY: 79.31). Contact of the tooth with the canal was observed in all cases in which the loss of cortical line of the canal or darkening of the roots was found on the panoramic radiographs.
CONCLUSION: Darkening of the roots and loss of the cortical line on panoramic radiographs might be highly suggestive of the risk of nerve injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Mandibular Nerve; Molar, Third; Radiography, Panoramic

Year:  2013        PMID: 23807934      PMCID: PMC3691370          DOI: 10.5624/isd.2013.43.2.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent        ISSN: 2233-7822


  15 in total

1.  Correlation of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT findings in the assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal.

Authors:  F S Neves; T C Souza; S M Almeida; F Haiter-Neto; D Q Freitas; F N Bóscolo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Application of cone beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Mansur Ahmad; J Jenny; M Downie
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.291

3.  Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extraction.

Authors:  Michael Sedaghatfar; Meredith A August; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Panoramic radiographic risk factors for inferior alveolar nerve injury after third molar extraction.

Authors:  Bart F Blaeser; Meredith A August; R Bruce Donoff; Leonard B Kaban; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Yoichi Nakagawa; Hisako Ishii; Yoshiaki Nomura; Nobuyuki Y Watanabe; Daigo Hoshiba; Kaoru Kobayashi; Katsunori Ishibashi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Sensitivity and specificity of pantomography to predict inferior alveolar nerve damage during extraction of impacted lower third molars.

Authors:  Ana Cláudia Amorim Gomes; Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos; Emanuel Dias de Oliveira Silva; Arnaldo de França Caldas; Ivo Cavalcante Pita Neto
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and inferior alveolar nerve with dental 3-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Keisuke Nakayama; Makoto Nonoyama; Yasuo Takaki; Toyohiro Kagawa; Kenji Yuasa; Kiwako Izumi; Satoru Ozeki; Tetsuro Ikebe
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Effect of exposed inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle during surgical removal of impacted lower third molars.

Authors:  Andrew Ban Guan Tay; Wee Ser Go
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve. Radiological and surgical findings, and clinical outcome.

Authors:  G W Bell
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.651

10.  Correlation of panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of a superimposed relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.

Authors:  Yun-Hoa Jung; Kyung-Soo Nah; Bong-Hae Cho
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2012-09-21
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Pre- and postoperative management techniques. Before and after. Part 2: the removal of third molars.

Authors:  J Mansoor
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 2.  Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: a review - based on a hierarchical model of evidence.

Authors:  L H Matzen; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT compared to panoramic radiography in predicting IAN exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Veronica Caroline Brito Reia; Gabriel de Toledo Telles-Araujo; Mariela Peralta-Mamani; Mariel Ruivo Biancardi; Cássia Maria Fischer Rubira; Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Validity of the vertical tube-shift method in determining the relationship between the mandibular third molar roots and the inferior alveolar nerve canal.

Authors:  Anjana Arora; Bharati A Patil; Amandeep Sodhi
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-23

Review 5.  Clinical significance of computed tomography assessment for third molar surgery.

Authors:  Kenji Nakamori; Kei Tomihara; Makoto Noguchi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-28

6.  Reliability of panoramic radiography in predicting proximity of third molars to the mandibular canal: A comparison using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Willy James Porto Nunes; Aline Lisboa Vieira; Letícia Drumond de Abreu Guimarães; Carlos Eduardo Pinto de Alcântara; Francielle Silvestre Verner; Matheus Furtado de Carvalho
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-01-28

7.  Accuracy of Panoramic Radiograph in Assessment of the Relationship Between Mandibular Canal and Impacted Third Molars.

Authors:  Weeraya Tantanapornkul; Darika Mavin; Jaruthai Prapaiphittayakun; Natnicha Phipatboonyarat; Wanchanok Julphantong
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2016-06-23

8.  The Risk Factors that Can Increase Possibility of Mandibular Canal Wall Damage in Adult: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Study in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Yafei Chen; Jiyuan Liu; Jun Pei; Yuanyuan Liu; Jian Pan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-01-02

9.  Oral Rehabilitation with Removable Partial Denture of a Patient with Cleidocranial Dysplasia.

Authors:  Ali Jamali Ghomi; Reza Sayyad Soufdoost; Mohammad Saeed Barzegar; Mohammad Ali Hemmati
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2020-05-09

10.  Tomographic late evaluation of xenogeneic bone grafts in sockets of impacted third molars.

Authors:  Osny Ferreira Júnior; Etiene Andrade Munhoz; Jéssica de Fátima Segantin; Eduardo Sanches Gonçales; Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.