Literature DB >> 23807089

Feasibility of real-time selection of frequency tables in an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant.

Matthew B Fitzgerald1, Elad Sagi, Tasnim A Morbiwala, Chin-Tuan Tan, Mario A Svirsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Perception of spectrally degraded speech is particularly difficult when the signal is also distorted along the frequency axis. This might be particularly important for post-lingually deafened recipients of cochlear implants (CIs), who must adapt to a signal where there may be a mismatch between the frequencies of an input signal and the characteristic frequencies of the neurons stimulated by the CI. However, there is a lack of tools that can be used to identify whether an individual has adapted fully to a mismatch in the frequency-to-place relationship and if so, to find a frequency table that ameliorates any negative effects of an unadapted mismatch. The goal of the proposed investigation is to test the feasibility of whether real-time selection of frequency tables can be used to identify cases in which listeners have not fully adapted to a frequency mismatch. The assumption underlying this approach is that listeners who have not adapted to a frequency mismatch will select a frequency table that minimizes any such mismatches, even at the expense of reducing the information provided by this frequency table.
DESIGN: Thirty-four normal-hearing adults listened to a noise-vocoded acoustic simulation of a CI and adjusted the frequency table in real time until they obtained a frequency table that sounded "most intelligible" to them. The use of an acoustic simulation was essential to this study because it allowed the authors to explicitly control the degree of frequency mismatch present in the simulation. None of the listeners had any previous experience with vocoded speech, in order to test the hypothesis that the real-time selection procedure could be used to identify cases in which a listener has not adapted to a frequency mismatch. After obtaining a self-selected table, the authors measured consonant nucleus consonant word-recognition scores with that self-selected table and two other frequency tables: a "frequency-matched" table that matched the analysis filters with the noisebands of the noise-vocoder simulation, and a "right information" table that is similar to that used in most CI speech processors, but in this simulation results in a frequency shift equivalent to 6.5 mm of cochlear space.
RESULTS: Listeners tended to select a table that was very close to, but shifted slightly lower in frequency from the frequency-matched table. The real-time selection process took on average 2 to 3 min for each trial, and the between-trial variability was comparable with that previously observed with closely related procedures. The word-recognition scores with the self-selected table were clearly higher than with the right-information table and slightly higher than with the frequency-matched table.
CONCLUSIONS: Real-time self-selection of frequency tables may be a viable tool for identifying listeners who have not adapted to a mismatch in the frequency-to-place relationship, and to find a frequency table that is more appropriate for them. Moreover, the small but significant improvements in word-recognition ability observed with the self-selected table suggest that these listeners based their selections on intelligibility rather than some other factor. The within-subject variability in the real-time selection procedure was comparable with that of a genetic algorithm, and the speed of the real-time procedure appeared to be faster than either a genetic algorithm or a simplex procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23807089      PMCID: PMC3899943          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182967534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  32 in total

1.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Rosen; A Faulkner; L Wilkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A test to measure subjective and objective speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Gabrielle H Saunders; Kathleen M Cienkowski
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Robert V Shannon; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Long-term auditory adaptation to a modified peripheral frequency map.

Authors:  M A Svirsky; A Silveira; H Neuburger; Su-Wooi Teoh; H Suárez
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  The reliability of a modified simplex procedure in hearing aid frequency-response selection.

Authors:  F K Kuk; N M Pape
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-04

7.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  An evaluation of three adaptive hearing aid selection strategies.

Authors:  A C Neuman; H Levitt; R Mills; T Schwander
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Preferred hearing-aid frequency responses in simulated listening environments.

Authors:  P G Stelmachowicz; D E Lewis; E Carney
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-06

10.  Speech based optimization of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Alice E Holmes; Rahul Shrivastav; Lee Krause; Hannah W Siburt; Elyse Schwartz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  10 in total

1.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  A new software tool to optimize frequency table selection for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Daniel Jethanamest; Chin-Tuan Tan; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  A Smartphone Application for Customized Frequency Table Selection in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Daniel Jethanamest; Mahan Azadpour; Annette M Zeman; Elad Sagi; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Self-Selection of Frequency Tables with Bilateral Mismatches in an Acoustic Simulation of a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Ksenia Prosolovich; Chin-Tuan Tan; E Katelyn Glassman; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  VALIDATION OF ACOUSTIC MODELS OF AUDITORY NEURAL PROSTHESES.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Nai Ding; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Matthew Fitzgerald; E Katelyn Glassman; Keena Seward; Arlene C Neuman
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process       Date:  2013-05

6.  Bilateral Loudness Balancing and Distorted Spatial Perception in Recipients of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Timothy J Davis; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Christine Menapace; Barbara Buck; Jillian Crosson; Lori O'Neill; Anne Beiter; Phil Segel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Jan R Edwards; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Information theoretic evaluation of a noiseband-based cochlear implant simulator.

Authors:  Daniel E Aguiar; N Ellen Taylor; Jing Li; Daniel K Gazanfari; Thomas M Talavage; J Brandon Laflen; Heidi Neuberger; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Individual Variability in Recalibrating to Spectrally Shifted Speech: Implications for Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael L Smith; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.