Literature DB >> 26409068

Information theoretic evaluation of a noiseband-based cochlear implant simulator.

Daniel E Aguiar1, N Ellen Taylor2, Jing Li1, Daniel K Gazanfari1, Thomas M Talavage3, J Brandon Laflen1, Heidi Neuberger4, Mario A Svirsky5.   

Abstract

Noise-band vocoders are often used to simulate the signal processing algorithms used in cochlear implants (CIs), producing acoustic stimuli that may be presented to normal hearing (NH) subjects. Such evaluations may obviate the heterogeneity of CI user populations, achieving greater experimental control than when testing on CI subjects. However, it remains an open question whether advancements in algorithms developed on NH subjects using a simulator will necessarily improve performance in CI users. This study assessed the similarity in vowel identification of CI subjects and NH subjects using an 8-channel noise-band vocoder simulator configured to match input and output frequencies or to mimic output after a basalward shift of input frequencies. Under each stimulus condition, NH subjects performed the task both with and without feedback/training. Similarity of NH subjects to CI users was evaluated using correct identification rates and information theoretic approaches. Feedback/training produced higher rates of correct identification, as expected, but also resulted in error patterns that were closer to those of the CI users. Further evaluation remains necessary to determine how patterns of confusion at the token level are affected by the various parameters in CI simulators, providing insight into how a true CI simulation may be developed to facilitate more rapid prototyping and testing of novel CI signal processing and electrical stimulation strategies.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Noiseband vocoder; Psychophysics; Simulation; Vowel perception

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26409068      PMCID: PMC4798893          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  27 in total

1.  Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; J Wygonski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Su-Wooi Teoh; Heidi Neuburger
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  MED-EL Combi40+ cochlear implantation in adults.

Authors:  Marc K Bassim; Emily Buss; Marcia S Clark; Karen A Kolln; Carol H Pillsbury; Harold C Pillsbury; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Speech production intelligibility of early implanted pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Mirette G Habib; Susan B Waltzman; Bobby Tajudeen; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Speech recognition in quiet and noise in borderline cochlear implant candidates.

Authors:  Farah Mohd Alkaf; Jill B Firszt
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for normal-hearing listeners and patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

9.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Christophe Vincent; Frédéric Venail; Paul Van de Heyning; Eric Truy; Olivier Sterkers; Piotr H Skarzynski; Henryk Skarzynski; Karen Schauwers; Stephen O'Leary; Deborah Mawman; Bert Maat; Andrea Kleine-Punte; Alexander M Huber; Kevin Green; Paul J Govaerts; Bernard Fraysse; Richard Dowell; Norbert Dillier; Elaine Burke; Andy Beynon; François Bergeron; Deniz Başkent; Françoise Artières; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Morgan N Parke; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.