Literature DB >> 1573880

The reliability of a modified simplex procedure in hearing aid frequency-response selection.

F K Kuk1, N M Pape.   

Abstract

The reliability of a modified simplex procedure to select the preferred frequency response on a programmable hearing aid was studied. The effect of stimulus materials on the selected frequency response, along with the consistency in which the selected frequency response was chosen in repeated test runs, was examined. Two groups of hearing-impaired elderly adults (from 59 to 88 years of age, with a mean age of 70 years) who had worn hearing aids for at least 1 year, participated in the study. Subjects were seen for six sessions lasting 2 to 3 hours each. During each session, subjects listened through a programmable hearing aid and selected a preferred frequency response for optimal hearing using a modified simplex procedure. Discourse passages and consonant nonsense syllables, presented in quiet and in noise, were used as the test conditions. Subjective judgment of discourse clarity and syllable recognition were used as criteria. Three estimates of preferred frequency response were obtained within a session when subjective judgment was used as a criterion and two estimates were obtained within a session when syllable recognition was used as a criterion. Subjects returned for a retest approximately 1 week after completion of all test conditions. The results of the study revealed that, depending on test conditions, approximately 30% of subjects selected the same frequency response and 80% of subjects showed test-retest deviation of less than one step size (one cell) in the selected frequency response. The consistency was highest for discourse material presented in noise and lowest for discourse material presented in quiet. Subjects preferred more high-frequency response when consonant syllables were used for recognition than when discourse was used for subjective judgment. On the other hand, more subjects preferred more low-frequency response for discourse judgment than for consonant-syllable recognition. These results suggest that the choice of stimulus materials affect the outcome and consistency in which these outcomes are generated with the simplex procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1573880     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3502.418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  9 in total

1.  Application of paired-comparison methods to hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Amyn M Amlani; Erin C Schafer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-12

2.  Feasibility of real-time selection of frequency tables in an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Elad Sagi; Tasnim A Morbiwala; Chin-Tuan Tan; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Trevor T Perry; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Consistency of Hearing Aid Setting Preference in Simulated Real-World Environments: Implications for Trainable Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Els Walravens; Gitte Keidser; Louise Hickson
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Self-Adjusted Amplification Parameters Produce Large Between-Subject Variability and Preserve Speech Intelligibility.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Trevor T Perry; Melanie Gregan; Dianne VanTasell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Perceptual Effects of Adjusting Hearing-Aid Gain by Means of a Machine-Learning Approach Based on Individual User Preference.

Authors:  Niels Søgaard Jensen; Ole Hau; Jens Brehm Bagger Nielsen; Thor Bundgaard Nielsen; Søren Vase Legarth
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; Dianne J Van Tasell; Bill Rabinowitz; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Perceived Sound Quality Dimensions Influencing Frequency-Gain Shaping Preferences for Hearing Aid-Amplified Speech and Music.

Authors:  Jonathan M Vaisberg; Steve Beaulac; Danielle Glista; Ewan A Macpherson; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Feasibility of hearing aid gain self-adjustment using speech recognition.

Authors:  Donghyeon Yun; Yi Shen; Zhuohuang Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Korea       Date:  2022-01-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.