Literature DB >> 23804252

Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging provides effective cardiac risk reclassification in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease.

Ravi Shah1, Bobak Heydari, Otavio Coelho-Filho, Venkatesh L Murthy, Siddique Abbasi, Jiazhuo H Feng, Michael Pencina, Tomas G Neilan, Judith L Meadows, Sanjeev Francis, Ron Blankstein, Michael Steigner, Marcelo di Carli, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Raymond Y Kwong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recent large-scale clinical trial found that an initial invasive strategy does not improve cardiac outcomes beyond optimized medical therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Novel methods to stratify at-risk patients may refine therapeutic decisions to improve outcomes. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In a cohort of 815 consecutive patients referred for evaluation of myocardial ischemia, we determined the net reclassification improvement of the risk of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (major adverse cardiac events) incremental to clinical risk models, using guideline-based low (<1%), moderate (1% to 3%), and high (>3%) annual risk categories. In the whole cohort, inducible ischemia demonstrated a strong association with major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio=14.66; P<0.0001) with low negative event rates of major adverse cardiac events and cardiac death (0.6% and 0.4%, respectively). This prognostic robustness was maintained in patients with previous coronary artery disease (hazard ratio=8.17; P<0.0001; 1.3% and 0.6%, respectively). Adding inducible ischemia to the multivariable clinical risk model (adjusted for age and previous coronary artery disease) improved discrimination of major adverse cardiac events (C statistic, 0.81-0.86; P=0.04; adjusted hazard ratio=7.37; P<0.0001) and reclassified 91.5% of patients at moderate pretest risk (65.7% to low risk; 25.8% to high risk) with corresponding changes in the observed event rates (0.3%/y and 4.9%/y for low and high risk posttest, respectively). Categorical net reclassification index was 0.229 (95% confidence interval, 0.063-0.391). Continuous net reclassification improvement was 1.11 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.39).
CONCLUSIONS: Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging effectively reclassifies patient risk beyond standard clinical variables, specifically in patients at moderate to high pretest clinical risk and in patients with previous coronary artery disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01821924.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic ischemia; magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23804252      PMCID: PMC4201834          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  25 in total

1.  Determinants of risk and its temporal variation in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans: what is the warranty period of a normal scan?

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Sean Hayes; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Leslee J Shaw; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Stress myocardial perfusion imaging by CMR provides strong prognostic value to cardiac events regardless of patient's sex.

Authors:  Otavio R Coelho-Filho; Luciana F Seabra; François-Pierre Mongeon; Shuaib M Abdullah; Sanjeev A Francis; Ron Blankstein; Marcelo F Di Carli; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08

4.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Stephan D Fihn; Julius M Gardin; Jonathan Abrams; Kathleen Berra; James C Blankenship; Apostolos P Dallas; Pamela S Douglas; Joanne M Foody; Thomas C Gerber; Alan L Hinderliter; Spencer B King; Paul D Kligfield; Harlan M Krumholz; Raymond Y K Kwong; Michael J Lim; Jane A Linderbaum; Michael J Mack; Mark A Munger; Richard L Prager; Joseph F Sabik; Leslee J Shaw; Joanna D Sikkema; Craig R Smith; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Sankey V Williams; Jeffrey L Anderson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Incremental prognostic significance of combined cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, adenosine stress perfusion, delayed enhancement, and left ventricular function over preimaging information for the prediction of adverse events.

Authors:  Scott E Bingham; Rory Hachamovitch
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Survival by stress modality in patients with a normal myocardial perfusion study.

Authors:  Nils P Johnson; Daniel R Schimmel; Sean P Dyer; Scott M Leonard; Thomas A Holly
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Value of stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with normal resting electrocardiograms: an evaluation of incremental prognostic value and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Daniel S Berman; Hosen Kiat; Ishac Cohen; John D Friedman; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Comparison of risk stratification with pharmacologic and exercise stress myocardial perfusion imaging: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sachin M Navare; Jeff F Mather; Leslee J Shaw; Michael S Fowler; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina).

Authors:  Raymond J Gibbons; Jonathan Abrams; Kanu Chatterjee; Jennifer Daley; Prakash C Deedwania; John S Douglas; T Bruce Ferguson; Stephan D Fihn; Theodore D Fraker; Julius M Gardin; Robert A O'Rourke; Richard C Pasternak; Sankey V Williams; Raymond J Gibbons; Joseph S Alpert; Elliott M Antman; Loren F Hiratzka; Valentin Fuster; David P Faxon; Gabriel Gregoratos; Alice K Jacobs; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial.

Authors:  John P Greenwood; Neil Maredia; John F Younger; Julia M Brown; Jane Nixon; Colin C Everett; Petra Bijsterveld; John P Ridgway; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Catherine J Dickinson; Stephen G Ball; Sven Plein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  20 in total

1.  Prognostic value of a new semiquantitative score system for adenosine stress myocardial perfusion by CMR.

Authors:  Sonia Gómez-Revelles; Xavier Rossello; José Díaz-Villanueva; Ignacio López-Lima; Esteban Sciarresi; Mariano Estofán; Francesc Carreras; Sandra Pujadas; Guillem Pons-Lladó
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Effectively Risk Stratifies Diabetic Patients With Suspected Myocardial Ischemia.

Authors:  Bobak Heydari; Yu-Hsiang Juan; Hui Liu; Siddique Abbasi; Ravi Shah; Ron Blankstein; Michael Steigner; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 3.  Exercise cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rhys I Beaudry; T Jake Samuel; Jing Wang; Wesley J Tucker; Mark J Haykowsky; Michael D Nelson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 4.  Myocardial blood flow quantification for evaluation of coronary artery disease by positron emission tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography.

Authors:  Alfonso H Waller; Ron Blankstein; Raymond Y Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of ischemic cardiomyopathy: Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christina Doesch; Theano Papavassiliu
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-26

6.  Risk stratification by regadenoson stress magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Siddique A Abbasi; Bobak Heydari; Ravi V Shah; Venkatesh L Murthy; Ying Yi Zhang; Ron Blankstein; Michael Steigner; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Vasodilator stress perfusion CMR imaging is feasible and prognostic in obese patients.

Authors:  Ravi V Shah; Bobak Heydari; Otavio Coelho-Filho; Siddique A Abbasi; Jiazhuo H Feng; Tomas G Neilan; Sanjeev Francis; Ron Blankstein; Michael Steigner; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04-09

8.  Response to letter regarding article, "stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging provides effective cardiac risk reclassification in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease".

Authors:  Bobak Heydari; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Perfusion Imaging for Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain.

Authors:  Raymond Y Kwong; Yin Ge; Kevin Steel; Scott Bingham; Shuaib Abdullah; Kana Fujikura; Wei Wang; Ankur Pandya; Yi-Yun Chen; J Ronald Mikolich; Sebastian Boland; Andrew E Arai; W Patricia Bandettini; Sujata M Shanbhag; Amit R Patel; Akhil Narang; Afshin Farzaneh-Far; Benjamin Romer; John F Heitner; Jean Y Ho; Jaspal Singh; Chetan Shenoy; Andrew Hughes; Steve W Leung; Meera Marji; Jorge A Gonzalez; Sandeep Mehta; Dipan J Shah; Dany Debs; Subha V Raman; Avirup Guha; Victor A Ferrari; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Rory Hachamovitch; Matthias Stuber; Orlando P Simonetti
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Evaluation of Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Risk Reclassification of Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Panagiotis Antiochos; Yin Ge; Kevin Steel; Yi-Yun Chen; Scott Bingham; Shuaib Abdullah; J Ronald Mikolich; Andrew E Arai; W Patricia Bandettini; Amit R Patel; Afshin Farzaneh-Far; John F Heitner; Chetan Shenoy; Steve W Leung; Jorge A Gonzalez; Dipan J Shah; Subha V Raman; Victor A Ferrari; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Matthias Stuber; Orlando P Simonetti; Venkatesh L Murthy; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 14.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.